Rating: Summary: Has to be seen to be beieved! Review: This has to be one of the sickest flicks on celluloid. I couldn't believe such a fim existed. It's no wonder that Pasolini was murdered not long after the release of the movie.
Rating: Summary: Strong,unflinching depictions of Nazis. Review: The late, great Pier Paolo Pasolini'sfinal film is a strong,unflinching dep-iction of Nazi atrocities. At the timeof its original release,it was the subject of controversy,due to the extreme nature of the film,which isloosely basd on de Sade's novel. Thefilm is DEFINATELY not for everyone,andshould never be seen by children.But,for fans of bold,provocative,Europeancinema,it is a disturbing,graphic,yetpowerful and beautiful work of art.
Rating: Summary: Especially disturbing for the decade it was released. Review: Pasolini was murdered by one of the actors who played a captive. After seeing this film you'll know why.
Rating: Summary: Pasolini Strikes Political Chord in post-Monica Times Review: Savage, primitive, egoistic, racist and full of wonderfully brutish and base imagery, this version of De Sade's infamous work is seeming to ask our own American government to ante up for its own silly, reckless, closeted sexual antics and abuse of power. Not for the weak hearted or politically naive.
Rating: Summary: The Feel Good Movie of 1975 Review: Quirkily hilarious Italian film from Pier Paolo Pasolini that will have viewers of every age laughing out loud. For those that like period pieces that aren't afraid to be funny, this is for you. For those that don't mind the tastefully executed bathroom joke, this is also for you. Finally, for those that laughed as they blushed during "La Cage Aux Folles" or "Priscilla: Queen of the Desert," prepare yourself for more inspired cross-dressing shenanigans. I sure wish that an American studio would remake this!
Rating: Summary: It summarizes the hidden splendour of our society! Review: It's capital
Rating: Summary: The other reviewers are simply pretentious! Review: Salo is a political farce that uses flying excrement and mutilation as its means. The DVD is truly wonderfully disgusting. Give this film a shot. If you are not offended easily, you might appreciate Pasolini's message - albeit a strange message.
Rating: Summary: Dishonest, cowardly shocker fails as art and exploitation Review: Pier Paolo Pasolini's notorious 1975 shocker "Salo" is an extremely well-made, disturbing, and sometimes powerful film. It's also incredibly boring, pretentious, and cowardly. Despite the incredible set design and cinematography, "Salo" fails on several levels. Somehow, Pasolini managed to turn de Sade's most incendiary work ("The 120 Days of Sodom") into a dry-as-dirt snorefest, occasionally livened up by assorted atrocities, including rape, coprophagy, and torture.What's most offensive isn't the graphic sexual violence (of which there is plenty), but Pasolini's choice to make his victims emotionless automatons. Pasolini's refusal to treat his victims as human beings changes what could have been a potentially powerful statement about the corruption of power into a dull peep show. "Salo" fails as art, because the film is dishonest in its portrayal of human suffering. Even worse, it lacks the bite of good exploitation fare, because it's pretentious, dull, and way too long. --Dave Jaudon
Rating: Summary: Disturbing & Alluring Review: This movie makes a deep welt in the minds of viewers. Passolini sets the most despicable acts of brutality and filth in a peaceful/beautiful frame of decorum. Mind boggling ... I just wondered what his unfinished film project "Porno Theo Colossal" would have been like.
Rating: Summary: AN EPIC MASTERPIECE!! Review: This movie takes you beyond any imaginable boundaries of bad taste. I love it! Nothing this extreme has ever been experimented with before Salo or after Salo. I strongly recommend that everyone read "The 120 Days of Sodom", by the Marquis De Sade. The movie is based on this novel, and upon reading it, the movie will seem like a PG-13 adaptation of the book. It's a must!!
|