Adapted from Books
Adventure
Animals
Animation
Classics
Comedy
Dinosaurs
Disney
Drama
Educational
Family Films
Fantasy
General
Holidays & Festivals
IMAX
Music & Arts
Numbers & Letters
Puppets
Scary Movies & Mysteries
Science Fiction
Television
|
|
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (Full Screen Edition) |
List Price: $19.98
Your Price: $14.99 |
|
|
|
Product Info |
Reviews |
Rating: Summary: Harry Potter is the BEST! Review: I think that the movie Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is one of the greatest movies of the decade! It is one of the best, if not the best, book-to-movie creations ever done in the movie biz. The characters played their role very well, especially Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, and Emma Watson. I can't wait until the next 6 come out!
Rating: Summary: cool movie!!! cool actors!!! ..... Review: I LOVE THE MOVIE! It was cool and I read the books before the movie was on the theaters. I like Daniel Radcliffe, he is cute but my friends like Sean Biggerstaff (oliver wood)he is too old for me, I am 13, I am 8 months bigger than Daniel, my mom is 3 years bigger than my dad!!so....I have blue eyes and my mom tell me that Dan looks like my brother but I don't think that way 'cause I LOVE HIM!!! He is very cute...WELL I know i will like the next movies of Harry Potter 'cause the books are toally amazing!!!If you want to talk to me my address is ... or we can talk in msn... I LOVE DANIEL!!!! I RECOMEND THE BOOKS AND MOVIES OF HARRY POTTER!!!
Rating: Summary: Harry Potter was awsome! Review: Hi, I went to see Harry Potter and it is an awsome movie kids of all ages and for adults. I think all the actors did a wonderful job.
Rating: Summary: Excellent adaption of the book Review: I was very impressed with the adaption of the book for the big screen. Generally, good books are made into bad or maybe decent movies. This was an excellent adaptation. The Quidditich match was very well done, and the casting was perfect. Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint absolutely steal the show as Harry, Hermione, and Ron. Richard Harris as Dumbledore and Alan Rickman as Snape are excellent support for the young actors.
Rating: Summary: THE GREATEST HIT Review: J.K. ROWLINGS HAS THE WAY OF GETING THE RIGHT WORDS SHE BRINGS OUT INTRIGE,SUSPENSE,HAPINESS,RAGE EVERY THING YOU COULD IMAGIN , THE EFECTS ON THE THE MOVIE ARE AWSOME. THE MOVIE IS AWSOME I JUST LOVED IT.I LOVED IT BECAUSE IT OPENS THE DOOR OF THE UNNOWN OF THE MAGIC, OF THE MOST SWEETEST,POLITE,BRAVE, CUTEST BOY AND THE BEST FRIEND EVER,OF THE MOST INTELIGENT GIRL EVER, OF THE BEST CHEST PLAYER EVER ,A GIANT WHOS THE BEST FRIEND YOU COULD HAVE, A DEAR OLD PERSON WHOS VERY WISE AND MANY MANY MORE...... HARRY POTTER IS THE BEST MOVIE EVER NO OTHER MOVIE IN THE UNIVERS IS BETTER THAN HARRY POTTER. I LOVE HARRY POTTER THE CUTEST PERSON IS : HARRY POTTER!!!!!!!!!!! I LOVE YOUR GREEN EYES U ARE A GREAT ACTER AND U HAVEA SPECTACULAR SMILE. PS I HOPE U GET RED WHEN U READ THIS}
Rating: Summary: harry potter movie Review: Well, it kept to the story line and didn't switch much around. The acting was great but after you see it one question remains on your mind: Where was peeves? It kind of [made me mad] that Peeves wasn't there. One other thing that bother me was that it was really short. They cut out several things in the book which I personally thought were important. It was only 2 and a half hours long. They should have made it 4 or 5 if they had to. ALSO, they kinda gave Neville the short straw there. When they went in the woods for detention Ron went with them and it was for being at Hagrids late, not because of Norbert. Neville got pushed to the side a bit and my last bit of complaint is towards the casting of Harry. The three things that make your image of Harry in his first year were changed. ONE, isn't he supposed to be skinny from lack of food from the Dursleys. TWO, He had dark brown neatly combed hair instead of black messy hair. AND THREE, was it just me or were his eyes blue instead of Green? I give it a 4 because it didn't match the book perfectly but it was close enough.
Rating: Summary: Good movie for children... Review: I found "Harry Potter..." to be a good movie for children, although I found the message of love as the saving "spell" to not be as strong as I would have expected it. Effects played a major role in it, but still it's highly likeable and definitely comes down as one of 2001's most notable visual achievements.
Rating: Summary: enchantment at hogwarts Review: i rated this movie at five stars because i feel it truly captures the spirit of the books and presents the film from a childs perspective that adults love too. while some of the characters were not portrayed by actors i thought "looked the part", the whole was very well done. one could almost feel they were at the banquet table with gryffindor, or involved in the quiditch match, or even shopping in diagon alley. cant wait for the sequel!
Rating: Summary: The Best Movie Of The Year!!!!!! Review: Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone was the best movie of the year. I do not think I have a seen a better movie ever. It sohuld win oscars, people' choice awards, and many other awards. It is SIMPLY THE BEST!
Rating: Summary: Excellent but still not everything the book was Review: I am completely obsessed with the books and have read them a good 3 or 4 times each so I know them cover to cover and word for word. The movie was excellent but not really as good as the book. I feel that they didn't spend enough time dwelling on Harry's misery in the Dursley's but it was ok because the rest of the movie made up for that slight lack of information. I would get irrattated during my veiwing of the film by skipping of scenes, such as the whole deal with Norbort, and also by lines that weren't exactally the way that they were said in the book. I was also very urked by Snape. Anyone who has read the book knows that he is tall, thin, has a long crooked nose and long greasy black hair. The actor that was casted to play him had none of these traits. Overall it was an excellent movie and Oliver Wood was very hott, this reveiw is really about what is wrong with the movie, everything else was fantastic.
|
|
|
|