Adapted from Books
Adventure
Animals
Animation
Classics
Comedy
Dinosaurs
Disney
Drama
Educational
Family Films
Fantasy
General
Holidays & Festivals
IMAX
Music & Arts
Numbers & Letters
Puppets
Scary Movies & Mysteries
Science Fiction
Television
|
|
Home Alone 3 |
List Price: $14.98
Your Price: $13.48 |
|
|
|
Product Info |
Reviews |
Rating: Summary: Too many Home Alone movies Review: You know, I never really thought the first two were THAT great (McCaulay Culkin can NOT act!) but they were, at least, humorous diversions. This third installment in the series was a total bomb. How many times do they think they can keep making the same movie before people are going to catch on?!? Besides, without the same untalented and annoying kid playing the central role, it just wasn't the same. Don't buy this movie. Buy the first one. Buy the second one, if you must. But, for the love of God, don't buy the third one!
Rating: Summary: A Great Movie Review: International crooks hide a top-secret computer chip inside a toy car, but an airport mix-up lands it in the hands of eight-year-old Alex Pruitt, who's home alone with the chicken pox. Madness and mayhem kick into high gear as the pint-sized hero defends his house against the bumbling bad guys, armed with an outrageous array of ambushes and booby traps.
Rating: Summary: This is a Big Joke of a Movie Review: Thrid and hopefully last Home Alone movie where the same story formula is repeated of a young child being left at home and defending his house against would be crooks. The movie is not helped by inconistent direction and rather second rate acting, plus tasteless jokes.
Rating: Summary: Not AS good as the last two Review: Its a great home alone, but I miss the boy who will always be the classic Kevin, Mucullay Culkin. But Alex D Lindz does it pretty good too. I love to watch this movie! This one though, is a lot different from the normal home alone story lines where Kevin has been lost or forgotten in someplace. Now Kevin is home sick with the Chicken Pox and must save his street from two burglars, (who have also been replaced by different actors)And Kevins trickery really isnt as classic and planned out bright minded and everything like the last two. But I guess its a good movie anyhow, though I do recomend the other two over this one.
Rating: Summary: Alex Linz Makes This One Better Review: I wasn't a great fan of the first two Home Alone movies but, much to my surprise, I liked this one very much and the biggest factor responsible was Alex Linz. He's much more appealing than Macauley Culkin and seems more believable in the role. In addition, the premise for this movie is more believable and the parrot and Doris are cute additions to the mix. It's fun for kids and adults as well.
Rating: Summary: Not The Best Home Alone... Review: Home Alone 3 is a great family movie, but it's not the same as Home Alone 1 & 2 were. First of all when you bring in a new kid in the 3rd film, it's not gonna be the same type of movie, because the kid is different and most importantly the bad guys are different. I mean how dumb do these bad guys have to be when they chase a remote control car and they can't catch up to it. At least in Home Alone 1 & 2 the plans were more believeable and fun to watch. If you are planning on buying this film..... PLEASE SAVE YOUR MONEY. I hope they dont make Home Alone 4 because I already had enough of Home Alone 3.
Rating: Summary: alex linz is good actor Review: why do people inst on pick on child star frist macauly, thenalex, and now jake lloyd. anyhow i thought alex was great in thismovie he is alot cuter than mac.the movie is more plauble then the frsit two. a kid could really be left home for the day with the chicken pox. the only thing i disliked was that his parents found out he trap the burglars. it was much better when the parents had now idea what he did. if you be the vhs verison be warnend there are a leat 14 perview on it. END
Rating: Summary: Home Alone 3 wasn't very good! Review: I like the Home Alone movies but I didn't like this one. I thought this third sequel of the Home Alone series was terrible it was more like a childern's movie. This wasn't like the other Home Alone movies it was like a different movie without a title. They should have stopped at 2 because I thought it was pretty stupid by the way they got a new kid to play in a new Home Alone movie they should have come up with a different title then naming it Home Alone 3 I thought that was dumb. I wonder what happened to Macaulay Culkin he was better than this kid who played in Home Alone 3.
Rating: Summary: It was pretty good Review: There was about a half an hour of traps, just like the first one. Don't get me wrong, its worth seeing. The thing I didn't like was that they filled up most of the movie with "heartwarming, family moments". The first one is best one because the kid is so incredibly funny and you will never stop laughing. I didn't laugh at all during this one. I guess I liked the crafty tricks mostly. I think that retarded 20th Century Fox just wanted to spit out a movie to keep audiences interested until Star Wars 1 and told John Huges he had to come up with a story, actors, and jokes with 30 minutes.
Rating: Summary: One's A Charm, Two's Great, Three's Overdoing It. Review: I thought the first two movie were great. This movie had nothing to do with the first two. Not only did Maculy Culkin not return (A big drop), neither did Harry and Marv (Another big drop). You think they at least bring the crokes back so they can try something new, like trying to outsmart a new kid. Don't support this movie unless your buying it used. And even then I don't recomend it.
|
|
|
|