Rating: 
Summary: Great christmas tale....
Review: I'll be the first to admit that GoodTimes has produced some, shall we say, "less-than-perfect" features over the years, but they have done very well here. This tale was obviously made by people who have a great deal of love and respect for the 1964 classic original. They have worked very hard to use computer animation to come as close as possible to the look of the old stop-motion animation, and I think they have succeeded. The characters' movements are a bit smoother than the original, but that is about the only difference. Returning from the '60s are Rudolph, the reindeer of the famous shiny nose, his dentist/elf buddy Hermie, the whacked-out miner Yukon Cornelius, the Abominable Snow Monster (will he ever learn to swim?), Rudolph's girlfriend Clarice, all of the minor characters, and of course, Santa Claus. They have come together to investigate the mysterious Toy Taker, who has managed to succesfully pirate all the world's toys, including Santa's workshop itself. The new actors provided to give voice to the classic characters all sound perfect. Richard Dreyfuss does well in a role as the obligatory snowman narrarator (though I do miss Burl Ives), and Jamie Lee Curtis puts in an appearance as the Hippo Queen. Rick Moranis provides the voice of the Toy Taker himself. Like many others out there, I grew up watching the original stop-motion Rudolph every year. I was a little worried that this wouldn't be any good, especially when I saw the GoodTimes label on it. But, my kids LOVE it! And, it was produced for them, after all. This movie makes absolutely NO pretense whatsoever that it was designed and produced for anyone but preschoolers, and it certainly succeeded with mine. As adults, we see the world with different perspectives than we did as little kids. Nothing, no matter how well done, will ever recapture the joys of the specials we saw for the first time as little kids back when you only had a chance to watch these shows once or twice a year. Especially since now you can buy them on DVD or VHS and watch them over and over, any time you want. Anything is more special when you are a kid and it is only availble to watch once a year. The animation is not the most top-notch out there, but then, it's not supposed to be. It's more concerned with looking like the original, with all its flaws due to 60's technology. And yes, the plot is not the most original in the world. Any parent will figure out the identity and motives of the Toy Taker before the movie is half over. But the kids will love it, and really, isn't that what it's all about??
Rating:
Summary: Ignore the Whiners
Review: There are three types of reviews worth ignoring for this video:
(1) Anyone who thought they were buying the 1964 classic. Why would you trust the review of anyone that dumb?
(2) Anyone who says "Rudolph is sacred." Rankin Bass et al. have already done two Rudolph sequels. This isn't virgin territory.
(3) Anyone who says my kids loved it, but I hated it. Just who are animated Christmas specials produced for, anyway? Truth is that this could have been awful like Goodtimes Rudolph movie from a few years back. This time the writers went out of their way to be faithful to the spirit of the original. Nearly every moment pays homage to some element of the original Rankin & Bass production, from the opening credits to the concluding musical number. Rankin & Bass's Rudolph sequels, great as they are, abandon all the other characters but Rudolph (even Santa was replaced by the Frosty Santa or the Year w/o Santa Claus Santa). The writers of this try to pick up where the 1964 special left off, with Hermie and Clarice and Yukon et al. (no Fireball, unfortunately) The songs are, with some exceptions, a definite attempt to draw on Rankin & Bass type orchestrations. They aren't all as great as the Johnny Marks songs, but "Best Christmas Ever" is a worthy contender. I was pleasantly surprised at how the writers were able to build on Romeo Muller's world from 1964 without wrecking it. It's a fun, warm holiday special. Real Rudolph fans ought to give it a chance. My chief complaints are that the computer animation falls apart with Yukon and the Bumble and Yukon's voice is off. These are really pretty minor complaints, however. Yes, my kids love it.
Rating: 
Summary: makes me angry on christmas!!! misleading sales pitch!
Review: all I asked for christmas this year was the original Rudolf the Red Nosed reindeer. Instead I revieved this version. It's one thing if they wanted to do a sequel to the original movie from 1964, but they should have made the box art look different. Anyone looking quickly at the cover of rudolf and some familiar faces from the original can be easily fooled that they are buying the original. Even the title is close to the original plot. It's like me doing a sequel to the wizard of oz and calling it "The wizard of oz- follow the yellow brick road" I didn't want to rate this DVD because I didn't see it, but I'm going to give 1 star because of the misleading sales pitch! I know others share how dissapointed and angry I am that the distributors are obviously trying to fool people into buying this, thinking that its the original. Shopping should be easy and stress free. You shouldn't have to spend 10 minutes reading the fine print and conducting an investigation before you buy something.
Rating: 
Summary: This "misfit" fits in... sort of
Review: Having been a big fan of the original Rankin-Bass stop-motion classic "Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer", I decided to give its computer-animated follow-up, "Rudolph and The Island of Misfit Toys", a look. While I didn't find it to be a presentation that can stand with the all-time holiday classics, it wasn't all that bad, either. Although most of the songs were fairly catchy if somewhat silly, most of 'em didn't really have a Christmas-y sound or feel to them. But at least the computer animation looked pretty advanced... had this movie been released some time in the early to mid-90s instead of 2001 when this hit the video shelves. Now I wasn't expecting the computer-generated 'toonage here to be on par with Disney/Pixar contemporaries Toy Story or Monsters, Inc (this WAS produced by GoodTimes Video after all). But at the very least I'd expected it to look as good if not better than the CGI stuff produced for the Roughnecks: Starship Troopers Chronicles show that had debuted some time before this came out-- no such luck, I'm afear'd... I was also abit disappointed that GoodTimes didn't want to spring for a feature-length director's commentary track. All the guy was given was three minutes to talk about the 'state-of-the-art' effects used to create this feature. I was also kinda miffed over the fact they decided to give some of the characters the same appearance (or as close to the same appearance as possible) they did in the original stop-motion classic (e.g. Hermey, the Foreman Toy Elf, Yukon Cornelius), but partially or almost completely revamped the appearances of other characters (e.g. Santa and Mrs. Claus, King Moonracer, and the sled-pulling reindeer). Call me old-fashioned, but the way I see it they should have had all of the recurring characters look exactly (or, at the least, very close to) the same way they did in the original show. Rudolph demoted from a ten-point buck to a four-pointer? Blasphemy! On the upside, I thought the story was pretty good, even though it was geared a bit more towards a new generation of young'uns than nostalgia buffs who grew up watching the original show. It also, for the most part, had captured the heart and spirit of its predecessor and the other Rankin-Bass holiday classics that inspired it. And best of all, it featured more than a few amusing hijinks with my fave character from the original Rudolph show: Bumble the Abominable Snow Monster! Though it's a shame he doesn't look as cool in the CGI realm as he did in stop-motion form... 'Late Post Script: Another downside to this presentation is the English subtitles, which are displayed in white type. Now white might be a fine shade to use for subtitles in movies where most of the scenery and backgrounds AREN'T COVERED IN FREAKING SNOW AND ICE-- but not here... 'Later
Rating:
Summary: Great christmas tale....
Review: I'll be the first to admit that GoodTimes has produced some, shall we say, "less-than-perfect" features over the years, but they have done very well here. This tale was obviously made by people who have a great deal of love and respect for the 1964 classic original. They have worked very hard to use computer animation to come as close as possible to the look of the old stop-motion animation, and I think they have succeeded. The characters' movements are a bit smoother than the original, but that is about the only difference. Returning from the '60s are Rudolph, the reindeer of the famous shiny nose, his dentist/elf buddy Hermie, the whacked-out miner Yukon Cornelius, the Abominable Snow Monster (will he ever learn to swim?), Rudolph's girlfriend Clarice, all of the minor characters, and of course, Santa Claus. They have come together to investigate the mysterious Toy Taker, who has managed to succesfully pirate all the world's toys, including Santa's workshop itself. The new actors provided to give voice to the classic characters all sound perfect. Richard Dreyfuss does well in a role as the obligatory snowman narrarator (though I do miss Burl Ives), and Jamie Lee Curtis puts in an appearance as the Hippo Queen. Rick Moranis provides the voice of the Toy Taker himself. Like many others out there, I grew up watching the original stop-motion Rudolph every year. I was a little worried that this wouldn't be any good, especially when I saw the GoodTimes label on it. But, my kids LOVE it! And, it was produced for them, after all. This movie makes absolutely NO pretense whatsoever that it was designed and produced for anyone but preschoolers, and it certainly succeeded with mine. As adults, we see the world with different perspectives than we did as little kids. Nothing, no matter how well done, will ever recapture the joys of the specials we saw for the first time as little kids back when you only had a chance to watch these shows once or twice a year. Especially since now you can buy them on DVD or VHS and watch them over and over, any time you want. Anything is more special when you are a kid and it is only availble to watch once a year. The animation is not the most top-notch out there, but then, it's not supposed to be. It's more concerned with looking like the original, with all its flaws due to 60's technology. And yes, the plot is not the most original in the world. Any parent will figure out the identity and motives of the Toy Taker before the movie is half over. But the kids will love it, and really, isn't that what it's all about??
Rating:
Summary: if you remember the original - don't bother!
Review: If the scoring could be zero? well I disgress. If you are old enough to remember the original claymation or what ever it was; you will be VERY disappointed. The computer generated characters are ok, but the story has been changed so completely that you will only recognize the main characters. Not worth the money. I suggest you look for a copy of the original.
Rating: 
Summary: And if you ever saw the reviews, you could say it blows...
Review: ...but guess what kiddies, it doesn't!!!!! I will put this very gently. Anyone here who rates this movie with a 1 (or less) and says nothing more than "It's not the original" is a moron. Now let me put things in a proper perspective. Now I must admit that I've grown up with the original Rudolph for 19 years straight and am a MAJOR fanatic of anything produced by Rankin/Bass, so when my 5-year-old little cousin forced me to watch this movie when I visited him for the weekend, I was VERY worried. First of all, this movie has been bombed online more than the Middle East, and it dons the "Goodtimes" label. (Goodtimes VHS of beloved movie=Adjusting the tracking for at least an hour before you get a good picture, and anything else from Goodtimes Entertainment=crap). Anyway, cherishing what memories I had left of the first Rudolph, I reluctantly sat down to watch. Surprisingly, it was excellent. First of all, everybody from the original (except most of the original misfit toys have been "replaced" with the next generation of misfits including the "Boomerang that doesn't return", and the Burl Ives snowman was replaced with Scoop the Snowman) makes a comeback (and with voices that are dead-on to the originals). Clarice is now learning how to fly, but will Rudolph's advice help her to stay off the ground? Hermie comes back, and this time, he has built his own super-duper, portable all-terrain dentist cart! He's the best dentist the North Pole could ask for, but he has a crush on someone. Will this timid, shy elf/dentist find a way to ask her out? The Abominable Snowman (now known as Bumbles) and Yukon Cornelius now run a Peppermint Mine. (If anyone would like to know why a Peppermint Mine instead of a silver and gold one, one of the cut scenes from the original shows that Yukon stumbled upon this mine, and that's why Yukon throughout the first Rudolph kept licking his pick after it touched wherever it landed.) Santa Claus and Mrs. Claus look a little different, because they don't have dots for eyes. They actually look better that way. And YES!!!!!! There's more footage of King Moonracer!!!!! Oh my God he is my favorite!!!! He has a horrible toothache!!!!!! Thank god a skilled elf/dentist like Hermie takes his nifty all-terrain dentist cart to the Island of Misfit Toys, but what will poor King Moonracer need done? My favorite of my three new characters was Queen Camilla. I actually knew someone who talked and acted the way she did in real life. I was laughing the entire time she was on the screen. The only character who I didn't care for too much was Scoop the Snowman. I'm not saying this because he's no Burl Ives. If he's not Burl Ives, SO WHAT?!? Sure Burl Ives was better, but I'm saying this because at some tense, thematic moments in this movie (which in the first one would be Bumbles BEFORE he was tamed), instead of hiding behind an umbrella, he tells the story with what appears to be an evil, grinning face. That's the best I can describe it. When Scoop had his "evil" face on during the tense, thematic moments, it scared the crap out of my little cousin, and I had to pause the movie and get him a glass of milk. Anyway, the story line was brilliant. If anyone can recall a TV cartoon series from 1993 called Bonkers and can remember the two-part pilot episode, then they'd too know what I'm talking about!!! (In Bonkers, there was this deranged cartoon rabbit called "The Collector" and he took cartoons like the "Toy Taker" took toys.) Okay, some people think that the ending was ripped from Toy Story 2, but let me give you all a reality check here. This actual movie was shown on some cable channel for the first time in 1998, and THEN three years later was released onto video. So in other words, this came out BEFORE Toy Story 2. And for those of you who are complaining about the computer graphics, DON'T. This is Goodtimes Entertainment we're talking about, not the multi-million dollar razz-a-ma-tazz computer animation job we're so used to seeing!!! For goodness sake, I found the computer animation to be just fine by me. "Moving tanks", "choppy animation", etc. PLEASE!!!! Okay, so Yukon's beard was off just a touch. LET IT GO!!!! Now comes the other reason why I give this a four and a half (I gave it a five because that's what 4.5 rounds up to). (Scoop was the first reason for the lower rating). The songs were actually VERY catchy, but the orchestration sounded like it came out of a cheap MIDI module. It sounded chinsy. The songs themselves (if you can ignore the cheap instrument sounds) were very great, and would be so much better if Goodtimes hired a real orchestra. Anyway, to sum it up, the movie (other than the lacking orchestration) was superb. If you're looking for the original Rudolph, then don't waste your time complaining about this one, but if you're looking for a trustworthy sequel, then go for it. (Note that the DVD has special features showing the painstaking time it took for them to get the computer animation just right). Also, if you people want something to moan and groan about, go purchase "Frosty Returns" and see what an abomination THAT one was to the original "Frosty". Thank you.
Rating:
Summary: Kids love it!!
Review: The first Rudolph animated movie is pale in comparison to this one. OK it may be sugary sweet but your kids (under 9) will love it. Why people pour scorn on this version is beyond me. Maybe they should have left it to their kids to review it!
Rating:
Summary: Buy the original - not this version!!!
Review: Very simple - Do not buy this! Buy the 1964 "Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer" original. There is no reason to buy this version.
Rating:
Summary: Celebrity Lament
Review: While I must admit at the outset that my children like this movie, I am somewhat appalled by it. And I don't think it's necessary to compare it to the Rudolph I grew up with in order to rank it poorly--nostalgia tends to color our opinions. What is obvious immediately is that this is, oddly enough, a vehicle for celebrities to lament their fame. Rudolph, once hating his unique glowing nose because it made him a misfit, gained acceptance because he saved Christmas with that oddity (really, a questionable moral for the first flick--you're only accepted if you can prove yourself worthy--compare with Thomas the Tank Engine's highest sought-after praise being that he's useful). Now Rudolph is famous and can't go anywhere without be asked to shine his attribute. It's all the other residents of the north pole care about. Poor Rudolph, if only he was just plain normal. (Hermie, at least, has discovered his bliss as a dentist--a rather plain profession where no one stalks you and asks you to show them your skills at root canal.) Anyway, the rest of the movie plays on this theme throughout. The low-light of the movie, and surely, after some distance, of this actress's career, is when Jamie Lee Curtis, playing a hippo Queen who is a plastic surgeon, sings about her ability to make everyone beautiful through her artistic abilities with the scalpel. She sure can give Rudolph the nose he wants! Now that Miss Curtis has come out against just this kind of thing and advocates aging without anxiety and without surgery--and wants to encourage young women to believe in their inner beauty (older women too!) rather than needing to "fix" what the society that is fashion magazines and Hollywood see as "flaws", she must want this one to get lost in a dust bin. It's where I'd like to put our copy.
| 
