Scream 2

Rating:
Summary: Tight, but....
Review: First of all, I'd like to ask the "reviewers" to learn how to spell. That having been said, this is what I think of the movie: Jerry O'Connell looks good, yeah...but he should've been "Sliding" out of this movie long before the end. Um...Campbell can act..."Never." And as for JACKIE being one of the killers? What? JACKIE??? I yelled it out in amazement when I watched the movie in the theater, and I'll yell it every time I watch this funny movie. JACKIE???

Rating:
Summary: VHS VIRSHION
Review: Scream2 is one of the greatest horror films if not the best horror films of wes cravens career. The movie realy blends in with the first one but overall scream2 is better in lots of ways. For instance scream 2 has more bloodscenes/victims. What makes these films more horrorfying is the realisticness of the overall afect.

Rating:
Summary: Very Good !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Review: This movie is the best. But not better than the first one. I think it stands out as off beat, or not as good as the first one because we all are use to having a sequal that has a new cast, new story, but the same killers. Scream 2 is a continuation of the first. I liked it!

Rating:
Summary: Best Sequel
Review: That was absolutely the best sequel I ever saw. That's why they are making a Scream 3 because this Trilogy must be respected. It makes the horror genre comes up being intelligent and sutil. 10 for it!

Rating:
Summary: Sequel, sequel...
Review: Once again the ghostmask is back where it should be. On a psychopath's head! This time, the killer(or killers?)is out to copycat the original killers, which has now been made into a hyped up horror called "STAB". Who can it be? The boyfriend? Gale Weathers (as if!)? or even the infamous Cotten Weary? Who knows? All I know is, is that this film is lacking the originality of the first. Something is missing. It's really great and funny and has scores of references to classic horrors gone before, but it doesn't seem to have that ongoing tension that the original contained. But with Scream 3 due out in December, this will definitely be the perfect trilogy to own.

Rating:
Summary: The worst horror movie ever
Review: Scream 2 is horrible, it's even worst than the first, the producers should be ashame of making Scream 3; and the people who said Ed Wood is bad should see this series, at least Ed Wood didn't had money or a clue of what he was doing.

Rating:
Summary: Money is a powerful thing
Review: Intellegent marketing is why this sequel to a perfectly good Scream1 is in existence. First off, I thought Scream1 was a homage movie paying trubute to all the classic slasher films. So why are they already making part 3 then? Because people are stupid enough to buy a ticket to it. Its ironic that it was stated in Scream2 that slasher sequels always must include more blood and more scares. This sequel does neither and is one long "who done it" bore. This movie seemed more like a parody of the original with the copy cat killers seeing the film based on the original wreak hovak. Whatever. Come up with some new ideas before you steal my money. I won't even bother to see Scream three because they already stole my 7.50$ for the movie ticket for Scream 2.

Rating:
Summary: A fast paced action thriller/horror a one of a kind sequel.
Review: The hugh money in take of the 1996 scream had people chanting sequel, sequel, sequel, sequel very quickly. I thought that scream 2 was not as scary and did not make me jump as much then the oringal scream, I respect the fact that the movie was a horror sequel and we all no what can happen to those sorts of sequels. Neve Campbell gave a worse performance than in the oringal but still very good, Jamie Kenndey was great i mean he was very funny and each time I play the movie i have to stop and watch the "sequel talk", the Cici phone call was not as intence due to the fact that Wes Craven did not fram it right (i mean you just knew that the killer would burst out of that closet). and i thought that the copy cat sppech was really amature. I also thought that scream was only funny due to the fact that people where scared and had to have a laugh no matter how big or funny the laugh may be, scream 2 was not as scary so the not so great jokes where not as funny. In conculsion i really really really did like this scary sequel and I can't waite for S C R E A M 3. P.s, scream 2 had lame music the scream music was very intence and had you on edge, the scream 2 music sounded like it was a real old 1970's horror and not scary at all, that was the big fact that made scream 2 not as good as the oringal, Marco if you read this make the scream music just like the oringal.

Rating:
Summary: A sequel worthy of the name "Scream."
Review: This film is the best sequel I have ever seen. It takes all of the aspects of the original Scream and reproduces them with a twist, and doesn't make it seem boring. This film is an unpredictable thrill ride from begining to end. Both this film and the original Scream should be ranking on the lists of the top ten best horror films of all time.

Rating:
Summary: Better, but not good
Review: After "Scream," it is impossible to make the sequel any worse. And, the sequel is an improvement, but still not good. All of the no-talents from the original are back, along with some new no-talents, to make this movie better. But, some of the scenes in the movie are so predictable is just made me angry. "He's not here!" screams Neve. "What?" screams her friend, standing 100 feet away, next to a dark alley. You do the math. But some scenes were intense, like the escape from the car. But other than that and some plot twists, this movie is still not scary. Buy "Halloween" for some true horror.