Rating: 
Summary: So-so
Review: I saw this movie a few weeks ago, so the details of it are sketchy. But I do remember a few things, one being that I was disappointed. Obviously, sequels are rarely better than the original so I expected to be a little diappointed, but I had faith in the writers because Scream 1 was very creative and original. This movie just seemed thrown together, jumping from scene to scene without any real coherence (kind of like my review). Neve Campbell's part was underwhelming she seemed disinterested in the movie, except a taxicab escape scene which was somewhat suspenseful, although predictable. The only thing which kept me somewhat interested to keep watching was that I had to find out in the end who the killer was, I turned out to be wrong by the way. Obviously I'm not gonna say who it was, but I really didn't care who it was by the time it was revealed. Courtney Cox was suprisingly good in this installment, she kind of stold the movie. David Arquette gets on my nerves, be it in an ATT commercial or here. Or is it 1-800-Collect? On no, thats the other goofball Al Bundy. Why are all these stars doing phone commercials? Bunch of sell outs. Cox and Arquette did have good chemistry however. A sloppy movie but worth seeing. The clever first ten minutes will get you hooked.
Rating: 
Summary: YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME!
Review: What happened, Wes Craven? He almost had a classic with the first Scream? What the hell was he thinking with the sequel. No suspense, way too predictable! Wes Craven just killed the whole Scream saga with this junk! This might very much be the dumbest sequel to any horror movie!
Rating: 
Summary: My fave horror flick!
Review: This one is much better than the first coz : 1 - it's harder to guess who the killer is. 2 - Courteney, Neve and Jamie look way better.Neve Campbell plays Sidney Prescott who has just got over the ordeal with psycho Billy Loomis 1 year ago! But after Maurren (Jada Pinkett) is killed at the screening of fast-moving reporter Gale Weathers's (Courteney Cox) movie, things go crazy as Sidney and all her friends are on the run once again! A great story, great plot, great killer, unpreditable.......PERFECT PEICEA HORROR!
Rating: 
Summary: I think STAB would have been better
Review: Campbell and friends are in college and trying to get on with their lives when a kopy kat killer strikes. A totally unnecessary sequel with repugnant jokes, dead laughs, and what has to be the worst musical performance by an actor in all of film history! Some good suspenseful moments and an improvemence by Cox make it better. The sorority twits are kind of funny too.
Rating:
Summary: Not totally unwatchable...
Review: So, we have another hack 'n slash thriller series on our hands. After watching the Halloween series fall into decadence, I'm loath to even think of watching Scream 3 when it comes out. However, while not on the same par as the first two Halloween sequals, Scream 2 isn't that bad. While not all of the long list of stars are talented actors, I must admit that most aren't particularly bad. This movie's script does not do many of the actors justice, though. They attempt to suprise you by killing the untouchable actor/actress(Yes, you KNOW who I am talking about), but all they do is take away my interest for watching Scream 3. If you want to see vintage Neve, watch Wild Things. For the best Sarah Michelle Gellar, watch the Buffy the Vampire Slayer series. Cox fits a lot better in a Friends format, than a horror film. Also, don't hang on your seats for a blow-out ending. It's an average one, if that. Still, just for an interesting view into the mind of a serial killer(s), watch this movie when you have the time.
Rating:
Summary: I LOVED THE MOVIE!
Review: When I first saw this, I thought it was WAY BETTER than the first, which was good! So, anyway, I hated the scene where Buffy was killed off and thrown off the roof by the killer! I loved it when sidney and gale killed the killers off!
Rating:
Summary: THIS ISN'T WORTHY!
Review: A really bad sequel. Do not rent this, you will only waste money. The acting is horrendous.
Rating: 
Summary: not as good as the original, but still worthwhile.
Review: scream 2 was fun, although not as good as the original scream. the ending was pretty lousy though, although the events leading up to the climax were terrific. literally, the only thing that ruins the movie is the ending. Other than that, its a roller coaster ride of thrills.
Rating:
Summary: i thought that the first part was better
Review: i would like this film more if it had diferent theme than the first part.it is too predictibl and we always know what will happen.so my advice is little less predictibl sceens and a litlle more emagination.but no metter what i would never miss it.
Rating:
Summary: This movie isn't worth the hype it's gotten.
Review: Hip. I hate that word. Any time you read a professional review of Scream it will tell you how hip this movie is. Well who cares, I want to be scared and watch teenagers die not be entertained with how cool everything is (If I want cool, I'll watch Happy Days). Well the teens do die. Just not very well. As for being scared. Forget it. You'd be just as scared watching Milo and Otis or the Care Bears. I am not a big fan of any one in this film so all the big names don't impress me. The story is o.k. infact it's the best part of the film. It's just that without being scared and/ or entertained then it fails. BTW Was I the only one who got annoyed watching Cox and Campbell shoot one of the killer's Pulp Fiction style. A. It didn't look right. B. Travolta and Jackson did it ten times cooler.
|
