Last House On Hell Street

Rating:
Summary: This is terrible
Review: I decided to begin my amazon dvd collection by purchasing this film(and I use that term very loosely).I have no problem with indie films,b-movies,and low budget shlockers,but this movie is just pathetic.It makes absolutely no sense.They show tree branches with inaudible noises in the background for no apperent reason other than to fill some time.There is no gore whatsoever,and if I could have given it zero stars I would have.Save your money.

Rating:
Summary: beautiful
Review: I ordered this movie as my intro to amazon,a cheap indie movie.Let me start by saying I have no problem with indie films,b movies,or cheap shlockers.But come on!!!This is a horror movie??I think not.You need some blood for a start.I can see a butchers knife beside someones head...is it supposed to be IN the head?who knows..you like seeing b&w tree branches with distorted voices in the background?This movie has a ton.Is a story to follow something that would interest you?Nothing to see here.Like saving money?Don't buy this dog.No more Sub Rosa movies for me....ever

Rating:
Summary: Whoa! This IS different!!!
Review: Okay folks, LAST HOUSE ON HELL STREET is one strange bizarre [messed]-up movie. Though it does not thrive from the "traditional" horror aspects, it is soooo whacked out that I found it extremely pleasurable. Haunting imagery and creative editing make this little gem stand out!
Speaking of "stand out" the performance from Robin Garrels was far above most if not all performances that I have seen on this (or any) level.

If you are dying for the different, the bizarre, or the non-"traditional" horror movie then LAST HOUSE ON HELL STREET is the perfect remedy!

Rating:
Summary: beautiful
Review: so far there have been two reviews for this film. one good and one bad but they are both good reviews in my eyes. like the first review said, this is a bizarre and non-"traditional" horror film, which unfortunatly is the opposite of what the average film goer wants to see. even the ones who look for "different" types of films cannot tolerate it when somthing truly experimental comes along. now to the second review. by saying that the film made absolutly no sense and had things for no apparent reason they simply confirmed what the first review pointed out. to certain people these are very good things and are the very type of things they seek out and long for. but to most these things are considered poor nonsense. to me these views in many cases stem greatly from the average persons ignorance of any presence of the collective unconcious. anyways the complaint about the lack of gore just confirms even more how great the film is since it doesnt have to resort to such things. gore films are what i consider the opposite of good horror. this is a beautiful film.