Rating: 
Summary: VERY GOOD
Review: A vamp story with naturally beautiful girls. I was surprised when I saw this one. Quite a few laughs between erotic scenes, and, for the most part, a pretty compelling story. Don't be confused, this is not Interview with the Vampire - but it's by far the most daring vamp/erotica production I've seen. Well worth it...you'll watch it more than once.
Rating:
Summary: Not the usual vamp fare
Review: A vamp story with naturally beautiful girls. I was surprised when I saw this one. Quite a few laughs between erotic scenes, and, for the most part, a pretty compelling story. Don't be confused, this is not Interview with the Vampire - but it's by far the most daring vamp/erotica production I've seen. Well worth it...you'll watch it more than once.
Rating: 
Summary: Avoid at all costs!
Review: As dedicated fans of this genre, my wife and I were extremely disappointed to find that this "film" (it really doesn't have the level of quality to be classified as such) was just another badly-acted low-browed poorly-scripted non-erotic blunder. Watching this was a waste of our time, and it will be a waste of yours, as well. This is the first movie that we're actually trying to return; we want our money back, and even if we do get the money we're still going to regret spending the time to watch it. As another point of irritation, the other reviews here praised this film. Why? The film was beyond bad, and it leaves me wondering what the other reviewers were thinking. One of the most valuable services that Amazon offers are these product reviews; I'm sorry that (at least on this occasion) the reviews were clearly misleading. Don't watch this film. You'll be sorry if you do :(
Rating:
Summary: Mistaken seduction
Review: For those of you who enjoy a few naked vampires, this movie will only be partly fullfilling - example, a woman gets in the bath, but she's still wearing her panties! What's the point in that? The plot is minimal, a vampire woman must seduce a man because he killed her master in a previous re-incarnation!? Talk about stupid. This film's also shot on video, so don't expect a big-budget effect. Leave this one behind.
Rating: 
Summary: Bonerific
Review: i thought that this was the best adult film I have seen in days. It really got me "started". If you are single, I suggest that you rent or buy this flick.
Rating: 
Summary: Vampirina soo fine
Review: Seduction Cinema puts out a lot of bad films alongside a good handful of pretty darn entertaining films; it's usually either all or nothing with these guys. Mistress of Seduction doesn't fit the bill, really; this film falls flat early on and stays there. The story certainly afforded the filmmakers a golden opportunity to give us fans what we want, but all we got was a whole lot of not much. Alysabeth Clements stars as Vamparina, a centuries-old vampire who has been tracking down the soul who killed her father long, long ago (her father was supposedly Count Dracula himself according to the movie summaries I've seen, but nothing in the movie really pointed me to such a conclusion). Clements is not really my idea of beautiful, but she does do a little sizzling of the screen with that vampiress attire of hers and that smoldering red hair. With the help of her latest lesbian victim, she finally discovers the location of her hated nemesis John (who doesn't even know what he did in his past life). As it happens, John's sister is also a lesbian, so there are all sorts of sexual goings-on taking place on both sides of the storyline. Unfortunately, all of these little girl-girl get-togethers are exceedingly boring; nothing happens beyond some kissing and heavy petting, and you won't find any complete nudity in this movie. I only emphasize this point because the same cannot be said of the vast majority of Seduction Cinema movies. On a more positive note, the filmmakers did at least emphasize the horror aspect of the whole vampire thing this time around. It's true they played weird noises that sounded like someone crunching into dry cereal every time a vampire sank her teeth into someone's jugular, but it's also true that we actually do get to see blood and just a tiny, tiny amount of gore here. Little good can be said of the acting; I thought Alysabeth Clements was pretty good as Vamparina, but the other actors and actresses brought very little to their roles. In one scene, two buddies are having a heated argument, yet both of them look bored to death throughout the scene. If you are a fan of vampire films, especially lesbian vampire films, Mistress of Seduction does have a little bit to offer you. If you are only interested in the types of sexual escapades frequently featured in other Seduction Cinema films, though, you may find little more than disappointment here.
Rating:
Summary: A surprisingly tame lesbian vampire film
Review: Seduction Cinema puts out a lot of bad films alongside a good handful of pretty darn entertaining films; it's usually either all or nothing with these guys. Mistress of Seduction doesn't fit the bill, really; this film falls flat early on and stays there. The story certainly afforded the filmmakers a golden opportunity to give us fans what we want, but all we got was a whole lot of not much. Alysabeth Clements stars as Vamparina, a centuries-old vampire who has been tracking down the soul who killed her father long, long ago (her father was supposedly Count Dracula himself according to the movie summaries I've seen, but nothing in the movie really pointed me to such a conclusion). Clements is not really my idea of beautiful, but she does do a little sizzling of the screen with that vampiress attire of hers and that smoldering red hair. With the help of her latest lesbian victim, she finally discovers the location of her hated nemesis John (who doesn't even know what he did in his past life). As it happens, John's sister is also a lesbian, so there are all sorts of sexual goings-on taking place on both sides of the storyline. Unfortunately, all of these little girl-girl get-togethers are exceedingly boring; nothing happens beyond some kissing and heavy petting, and you won't find any complete nudity in this movie. I only emphasize this point because the same cannot be said of the vast majority of Seduction Cinema movies. On a more positive note, the filmmakers did at least emphasize the horror aspect of the whole vampire thing this time around. It's true they played weird noises that sounded like someone crunching into dry cereal every time a vampire sank her teeth into someone's jugular, but it's also true that we actually do get to see blood and just a tiny, tiny amount of gore here. Little good can be said of the acting; I thought Alysabeth Clements was pretty good as Vamparina, but the other actors and actresses brought very little to their roles. In one scene, two buddies are having a heated argument, yet both of them look bored to death throughout the scene. If you are a fan of vampire films, especially lesbian vampire films, Mistress of Seduction does have a little bit to offer you. If you are only interested in the types of sexual escapades frequently featured in other Seduction Cinema films, though, you may find little more than disappointment here.
Rating:
Summary: VERY GOOD
Review: Sexy soft core erotica with good acting and relatively high production value. It involves a manipulative woman who uses her sexual attraction at first in phone sex and then goes on to bigger scams. The plot is not too simple mnded considering what we have here.
Rating:
Summary: Vampirina soo fine
Review: The Girls are natural and hot! The lead girl has talent a good BITCH!. The other "GOOD" girl looks great and seems warmer.
then the back ground eyecandy is nice as well.
The males seemed to be lifeless great IF the were already vampired. The FX are good the blood bath scene. was really well done.
A great effort i hope the co makes more and better entertainment
in the future.
Rating: 
Summary: Mistress of Seduction only O.K.
Review: THE MOST IMPORTANT THING YOU SHOULD NOTE: The two girls featured on the cover of this video ARE NOT IN THE MOVIE! The story is somewhat interesting. Some attractive girls. A few okay non-explicit sex scenes. Most of the actresses get topless. Not much more. DVD EXTRAS: The same previews from all Seduction Cinema releases. Also, clips from auditions were interesting but nothing of the "casting couch" sort. Outtakes included multiple takes of a male actor attempting to take off an actresses bra. Yawn. PROS: Looks like they actually had a script. Cute naked girls. CONS: Looks like they actually had a script.
| 
