Rating: 
Summary: It's a killer!!!
Review: "Before you die, you see the ring." Oh wait, wrong movie...Who could blame me for confusing the two films? They have extremely similar plots. In this one, no one sees the ring, but they do de 48 hours after logging onto the website feardotcom.com--why not just fear.com is beyond me, maybe cause the site already existed? Anyway, it is up to tough detective Mike Reilly (Stephen Dorff, who is always pleasant to watch) and Department of Health Associate Terry Huston (Natasha NcElhone, who is very beautiful and deserves a great movie) to research these mysterious deaths. The only way to find out what happened is to enter the site itself...pretty spooky huh??? Not really, and although not as scary or spooky as its far superior follower, feardotcom does deliver a few chills, and edge-of-the-seat suspense. Too bad its intriguing plot is never fully explored, and ended up disappointing. The set-up was quite intriguing, but the final result was one big mess. It is unfortunate because the film had incredible potential to go above the standard Hollywood "frightfest," but it does not succeed. There is no big pay-off and no logical explanation, confusing us more in the end than we were in the beginning. It falls apart from one too many ideas and plot holes you could -- and do -- get lost in. Overall there is some enjoyment and great visuals, but the screenplay needed a re-write.
Rating: 
Summary: Dumb, stupid, repulsive, waste-of-your-time flick
Review: You know those horror movies where people say some thing like, "Don't go into the dining room!" and by the end of the movie at least five people have gone into the dining room only to be killed?This movie is like that. Some one, after getting into a horrible life-threatening accident, says to some one else, "Don't go to the website!" So of course, that must mean the website is worth going to and people go to it any way, only to end up in a similar condition. Also, I have to say I was lucky when I saw this movie because I happened to be with a friend who was from Germany and could translate the German parts...because they don't offer any translation. Not that I care, you know...
Rating: 
Summary: Yawn
Review: Like the above Amazon review states, Fear dot com is a total mess. Director William Malone throws away such things as character development and sensible storytelling to go for pure visceral thrills and shocks; something that worked in his 1999 remake of House on Haunted Hill, but it doesn't work it all here. The talents of Stephen Dorff and Natasha McElhone are wasted here as neither's character is allowed to develop, thus both actors give lacking performances. The story revolves around an internet site visited by four people, all of which died 48 hours after visiting the site. The screenplay is loaded with plot holes and contrievances, hardly explaining anything of the going's on. Genre stalwarts Udo Kier and Jeffrey "Re-Animator" Combs are on board in minor roles, while Stephen Rea manages to inject some life into this otherwise dismal horror pic with his maniacal performance. All in all, Fear dot com is worth a look for horror afficiondos, just don't expect much.
Rating:
Summary: The stupidity hurts my head.
Review: This movie is the worst horror movie I've ever seen, and perhaps the worst movie in general. This is sad, considering I watch mainly horror movies. I really couldn't stand this movie. It jumps around, eludes to a few "scary" things here and there, and just doesn't make much sense overall. Sure, there are one or two scenes where I thought "hmmm, that was a little scary," but other than that, it lost my interest. I would not recommend this to anyone.
Rating:
Summary: Just plain BORING!!!
Review: Fear Dot Com starts out with the murder of a man who gets run over by a train. Then while Stephen Dorff's character then finds out that before his death that he visited this website called fear.com. So now, he is on the run to find out who is the maker of this website and get him in charge for murder. Then while going to the website, he see's another murder online and is found in a bathtub dead. Then of course there is killing and by the end of the movie, you are just disguisted with this movie. The end kind of makes sense, but it's just STUPID! It is trying to get on the range of The Ring, but it FAILS TERRIBLY!
This DVD falls into Bombsville.
Rating:
Summary: Get The Ring Instead
Review: Wow, so Feardotcom is a terrible movie. It's like, "Hi- I wanna be The Ring. But I have an awful and poorly executed plot, shot too dark to be scary and my otherwise talented actors are not believable due to poor story choices." God, it was bad. The one highlight in this non-scary horror movie? Stephen Dorf. You may remember him as Deacon Frost from Blade.
HOT.
Of course... he didn't have the teeth in this one... dissapointing...
Rating:
Summary: Utter cinematic garbage, not even worth a rental!!
Review: Could this movie be any more of a ripoff of the plot of The Ring? Then again, I could be wrong. I'm not even sure this movie had a plot, anyway. It's just an incoherent pile of garbage that at times is almost painful to watch. There is nothing in this movie but the director's typical perverse sadism, a few impressive visuals, and some of the worst acting this side of Showgirls. Someday director William Malone is going to be arrested for something really nasty, and the world will see what a twisted sicko this guy actually is. Avoid this movie at all costs! If someone gives you this movie as a gift, they probably secretly hate you!!
Rating:
Summary: Get The Ring Instead
Review: Wow, so Feardotcom is a terrible movie. It's like, "Hi- I wanna be The Ring. But I have an awful and poorly executed plot, shot too dark to be scary and my otherwise talented actors are not believable due to poor story choices." God, it was bad. The one highlight in this non-scary horror movie? Stephen Dorf. You may remember him as Deacon Frost from Blade.
HOT.
Of course... he didn't have the teeth in this one... dissapointing...
Rating:
Summary: Oh the humanity!
Review: The only fear in "Feardotcom" is the fear you will have wondering if you can survive watching this clunker. Directed by William Malone (who made the lousy remake of "House on Haunted Hill"), "Feardotcom" is a horror film so loaded with clichés; so weighed down with bad acting, a confusing script, plodding pacing, and continuity errors in the thousands that surviving the experience says something important about your mental and physical fortitude. If you do come out the other side unscathed, as I did, the most you will get out of the experience is the realization that you are a complete dunderhead for sticking with it when instinct told you to turn it off five minutes after the film started. It kills me to write such an acidic review of Malone's monstrosity only because actor Stephen Rea co-stars in it. Rea, if you aren't familiar with his acting, usually turns in excellent performances. His role as a conflicted yet sensitive forensics expert in the HBO drama "Citizen X" was one of the best acting gigs in the 1990s. Rea also starred in the critically acclaimed "The Crying Game." What he is doing in this boat anchor is a question for the ages. Maybe he needed the money. Maybe he owed a friend a favor. Maybe he went completely insane. Whatever the case, he should have passed on "Feardotcom." The damage to his career may well be irreparable. I never felt as though I caught on to the plot in this film. Perhaps I am a lazy viewer who gets a little crabby when a movie doesn't reveal everything to me in an easy to understand way. Nah, that can't be it. If so, why would I watch films like "Fando & Lis" and "Begotten"? Challenging films don't usually bore me. Problem is, "Feardotcom" isn't the sort of movie you want to find challenging. The central idea of the film involves a nasty looking website called, what else, fear.com. Anyone who signs on for a peek dies mysteriously two or so days later. Why? Apparently, the ghost of a girl named Jeannine haunts the site and kills anyone who dares log on. Why? Apparently, Jeannine died at the hands of the nefarious Alistair Pratt (Rea), a psycho who abducts, tortures, and murders women so he can televise his handiwork live on the Internet. Now Pratt is staging a new round of webcam murders, seemingly unaware the revenant of one of his former victims seeks revenge. For the record, Alistair Pratt is a real loony who likes to whisper overwrought serial killer type lingo to his victims as he prepares to slice and dice for the entertainment of his fans. Rea is a great actor, but even he fails to pull Pratt's dialogue off in a convincing manner. Enter stage left (or right) Detective Mike Reilly (Stephen Dorff) and Department of Health Inspector Terry Huston (Natascha McElhone). Reilly and Huston become involved in both the Pratt investigation and the website hauntings after a couple of German tourists accidentally film their experiences (and ultimate demises) with fear.com. Predictably, and after several other minor characters expire, Reilly signs on to the website in an effort to discover exactly what is going on. Start the clock, folks, because the cop only has forty-eight hours to crack the case before he ends up in a garbage bag down by the river. Sadly for Reilly, he ends up in the hospital for a time, thus leaving Huston to pick up most of the investigative duties. She discovers the secrets behind the Jeannine incident, finds the girl's corpse underwater, and eventually uncovers Alistair Pratt's secret lair. There's a big showdown between Reilly, Huston, Pratt, and the ghost of Jeannine before the credits mercifully ring down on a film that ought to find comparisons to such dreck as "Manos, The Hands of Fate" and "Invasion of the Blood Farmers." O.K., I am exaggerating; it's not as bad as those two films, but "Feardotcom" really ought to win some sort of award for bad filmmaking. The movie's difficulties are just too much to overcome. First, the acting is insipid. Even Rea can't bring himself to inject a modicum of interest into his character. Dorff and McElhone resemble less human beings and more two of those wooden chiefs you used to see outside cigar shops. How can a viewer care about a film when he or she cannot care about any of the characters? Second, it's obvious Malone made his actors secondary to the special effects, a bad move here. "Feardotcom" is chock full of dark buildings, strobe light effects, and the sort of cheap shocks routinely employed by your local haunted house around Halloween. It's just not scary; I kept expecting the principal characters to break into an extended disco dance sequence with all those lights spinning around. Finally, the continuity errors massacre any hope the film had at success. Suspending disbelief is important in any film, but doing so here is impossible. It took several days for a hemophiliac to perish at the hands of Pratt? How did Huston find a body under all that submerged junk? Couldn't anyone in the world sign on to that website? Sigh. The "Feardotcom" DVD contains loads of extras: a trailer for the film, cast and crew filmographies, a deleted scene that makes no sense whatsoever, an interview with the director, and a behind the scenes featurette. Maybe we should give it up for Malone and his "Feardotcom" juggernaut. How many films this bad manage to get a theatrical release in this day and age? Precious few, my friends, precious few. I think this one went in and out of the theaters so quickly it gave moviegoers whiplash. Even horror fans would do well to give this one a pass.
Rating:
Summary: Dumb, stupid, repulsive, waste-of-your-time flick
Review: You know those horror movies where people say some thing like, "Don't go into the dining room!" and by the end of the movie at least five people have gone into the dining room only to be killed? This movie is like that. Some one, after getting into a horrible life-threatening accident, says to some one else, "Don't go to the website!" So of course, that must mean the website is worth going to and people go to it any way, only to end up in a similar condition. Also, I have to say I was lucky when I saw this movie because I happened to be with a friend who was from Germany and could translate the German parts...because they don't offer any translation. Not that I care, you know...
|
