Rating: Summary: Another great film for Rickman Review: ...okay, I am biased. I love everything Alan Rickman has done. I did do investigation of Mesmer before watching the movie in order to know what type of character he was portraying. The entire subject was intreguing. It brings to light the inadequancies of medicine during this time. The lack of common sense is appalling. BLEEDING people??? I don't think so. He brought to light the connection between a person's body and mind. Making them work together. The blindness of Maria Theresa, obviously a result of her fathers physical abuse of her at an early age, was sad because he could have cured her, but she was taken away by the money grubbers too soon. Yes, I was enthralled and hated to see it end.
Rating: Summary: Another great film for Rickman Review: ...okay, I am biased. I love everything Alan Rickman has done. I did do investigation of Mesmer before watching the movie in order to know what type of character he was portraying. The entire subject was intreguing. It brings to light the inadequancies of medicine during this time. The lack of common sense is appalling. BLEEDING people??? I don't think so. He brought to light the connection between a person's body and mind. Making them work together. The blindness of Maria Theresa, obviously a result of her fathers physical abuse of her at an early age, was sad because he could have cured her, but she was taken away by the money grubbers too soon. Yes, I was enthralled and hated to see it end.
Rating: Summary: quite unMesmerizing indeed Review: A fine cast is squandered in this muddled and ambiguous film. Worth a look for it's fine performances, but if you want some real insight into the actual history of Dr. Anton Mesmer, you'll have to go to the library.
Rating: Summary: I liked it! Review: Ah, yes the infamous movie with virtually no sound. If you have those little Sony speakers, you can crank up the volume all the way and put the speakers by your ears and you can hear the dialogue that way. First, let me get the cons out of the way. There are some plot elements that never got resolved. For instance, what happened to the girl with the crush on Mesmer? Who was she anyway? Why is Mesmer's son so idiotic and totally unlike his father??? Why are there scenes that look like they've been replayed? (The glass bowl scene.) But if you manage to look past all of that, Mesmer is a very entertaining movie. Mesmer is truly a feast for the eyes. The costumes and scenery are brought out even more by the lush color quality of the dvd. And oh, are there costumes! If you are a sucker for costume films, then Mesmer's lovely puffy sleeves and purple velvet cloak will surely impress. The acting in this movie is great too. Alan Rickman, is, of course, marvelous and top notch. I love the scene when he is hugging Maria Teresa after she accidentally revealed her secret to him. Watch those haunted eyes. You can see his confusion, then realization, then anger and fierce protectiveness. Amanda Ooms is a very talented actress as well. They bring the somewhat awkwardly written script to life. For those of you who are Alan Rickman fans and haven't seen this movie... you can't call yourself a fan! Mr. Rickman has completely sensual long hair and dons an array of fabulously sexy costumes (as mentioned before.) There are plenty of hand scenes. His hands are extremely beautiful. And his low, purring voice makes full use of the DVD subwoofer. Be sure to turn up the bass! As for the story, I have to admit it ends without a real resolution. But then again, Mesmer is a historical movie based on real events (or so they say) and realistically speaking, not that many people have exciting, Mission Impossible style lives. The movie Mesmer gives the viewer a glimpse into a period of the doctor's life, and his beliefs and methods of healing, not a perfect bedtime story where the heros slay the dragon in the end and ride off into the sunset. Just the scenes of Mesmer's healing methods and the intimate moment with Maris Teresa are good enough for me! All in all, a great feast for the eyes and some emotional parts are worth watching over and over again. Make good use of the foast forward and rewind buttons on your remote. That's why they're there!
Rating: Summary: Mesmer Review: Alan Rickman is superb as Mesmer. Too often he is cast as the villian. Here, he is a healer with heart exposed. I fancy this chap's talent, voice, presence on screen and finally get a closer look at his character. Here, he is not evil nor glib, silent, nor sadistic, just caring and passionate in his beliefs. Perhaps this best mirrors the man we see too little of on the big screen.
Rating: Summary: Mesmer Review: Alan Rickman is superb as Mesmer. Too often he is cast as the villian. Here, he is a healer with heart exposed. I fancy this chap's talent, voice, presence on screen and finally get a closer look at his character. Here, he is not evil nor glib, silent, nor sadistic, just caring and passionate in his beliefs. Perhaps this best mirrors the man we see too little of on the big screen.
Rating: Summary: Wonderful! Review: Alan Rickman stars as Dr. Frantz Anton Mesmer, an Austrian physician in the 18th century who is considered to be the most influential figure in the development of hypnosis. Dr. Mesmer used magnets and metal frames in water to put his patients in a trance-like state in order to cleanse the magnetic forces in the body. He believed that a person�s emotional and mental state was directly related to physical illness. He felt that everyone had the ability to heal themselves of any disease just by breaking through the mental barriers and �re-aligning� the magnetic forces. (I believe they call it �life energy� today.) Dr. Mesmer did achieve success with his treatment but was ridiculed and ostracized by the medical community. The staid medical establishment of the time did not approve of Mesmer�s oftentimes theatrical performances and excessive showmanship. As a result, Mesmer was condemned by his medical colleagues and forced to leave Vienna. He practiced in Austria, Switzerland and Germany before settling in France. Mr. Rickman truly captures the charismatic and controversial character of Dr. Mesmer. This film shows how the physician practiced his craft but I felt it didn�t really explain how he developed his technique originally. (In fact, the film has a few unexplained gaps in it.) The movie focuses on two of Mesmer�s patients; one is the cousin of his wife, the other is a gifted musician he encounters at a recital. His wife�s cousin, a young girl, seems hopelessly brain damaged and he never really helps her. The musician is a beautiful young woman (Amanda Ooms) who is blind. Mesmer believes he can cure her blindness and becomes quite taken with her. He discovers that her father has been sexually abusing her since she was a young child. She lost her sight at the age of 3 and Mesmer believes that the abuse is perhaps what caused her blindness. The doctor�s treatment to help her regain her sight seemingly fails until she falls and bumps her head. The impression here is that the fall is what really restores her sight but Mesmer (and the woman) believes he did it. Also highlighted in the movie is Mesmer�s relationship with his wife, which is miserable. They seem to hate one another and I wondered why he married such a shrew in the first place. Another unexplained gap is when Mesmer is shown living in Paris for two years and you don�t know if he is still married or not. Even with the unexplained gaps this is still a very good movie. It is a must have for the Alan Rickman fan (which I am). I would have given it 5 stars except for the gaps and the ending, which leaves you hanging. After two years, the young woman is brought in to testify against Dr. Mesmer at a hearing. With her sight restored, the musician returned home and, in so doing, returned to her sexually abusive father. She felt abandoned by Mesmer and this, along with her father�s abuse, resulted in the loss of her sight yet again. The movie ends with Mesmer and her just sitting silently together. Maybe I missed something but I just didn�t get the ending. I�ll have to watch the movie again. Still, I do recommend it and perhaps you will find yourself mesmerized by it.
Rating: Summary: Wonderful! Review: Alan Rickman stars as Dr. Frantz Anton Mesmer, an Austrian physician in the 18th century who is considered to be the most influential figure in the development of hypnosis. Dr. Mesmer used magnets and metal frames in water to put his patients in a trance-like state in order to cleanse the magnetic forces in the body. He believed that a person's emotional and mental state was directly related to physical illness. He felt that everyone had the ability to heal themselves of any disease just by breaking through the mental barriers and 're-aligning' the magnetic forces. (I believe they call it 'life energy' today.) Dr. Mesmer did achieve success with his treatment but was ridiculed and ostracized by the medical community. The staid medical establishment of the time did not approve of Mesmer's oftentimes theatrical performances and excessive showmanship. As a result, Mesmer was condemned by his medical colleagues and forced to leave Vienna. He practiced in Austria, Switzerland and Germany before settling in France. Mr. Rickman truly captures the charismatic and controversial character of Dr. Mesmer. This film shows how the physician practiced his craft but I felt it didn't really explain how he developed his technique originally. (In fact, the film has a few unexplained gaps in it.) The movie focuses on two of Mesmer's patients; one is the cousin of his wife, the other is a gifted musician he encounters at a recital. His wife's cousin, a young girl, seems hopelessly brain damaged and he never really helps her. The musician is a beautiful young woman (Amanda Ooms) who is blind. Mesmer believes he can cure her blindness and becomes quite taken with her. He discovers that her father has been sexually abusing her since she was a young child. She lost her sight at the age of 3 and Mesmer believes that the abuse is perhaps what caused her blindness. The doctor's treatment to help her regain her sight seemingly fails until she falls and bumps her head. The impression here is that the fall is what really restores her sight but Mesmer (and the woman) believes he did it. Also highlighted in the movie is Mesmer's relationship with his wife, which is miserable. They seem to hate one another and I wondered why he married such a shrew in the first place. Another unexplained gap is when Mesmer is shown living in Paris for two years and you don't know if he is still married or not. Even with the unexplained gaps this is still a very good movie. It is a must have for the Alan Rickman fan (which I am). I would have given it 5 stars except for the gaps and the ending, which leaves you hanging. After two years, the young woman is brought in to testify against Dr. Mesmer at a hearing. With her sight restored, the musician returned home and, in so doing, returned to her sexually abusive father. She felt abandoned by Mesmer and this, along with her father's abuse, resulted in the loss of her sight yet again. The movie ends with Mesmer and her just sitting silently together. Maybe I missed something but I just didn't get the ending. I'll have to watch the movie again. Still, I do recommend it and perhaps you will find yourself mesmerized by it.
Rating: Summary: Mesmer Review: Any movie with Alan Rickman is worth seeing, because he always puts everything he has into any performance. This is a movie I would not have seen if Alan Rickman weren't starring. The backdrops in Vienna were visually stunning. However, this is a movie about a doctor who was incompetant and didn't even know he was incompetant. This is a historical piece thus there are no significant conflicts in this film except between Mesmer and his wife and Mesmer and the rest of the medical community.
Rating: Summary: One of the saddest movies ever +one of the best actors ever Review: First, to get some things clear: the boy is Mesmer's stepson and the marriage is propably a business arrangement, as hinted by both Mesmer and his wife. As marriages were in those days. The movie then... Yes, at times Rickman's voice was very hard to hear and the plot seems a bit loose. I admit he's got the most expressive face, eyes, voice and hands in the movie business and for once they were very well portrayed. In fact, the movie seems to rely on them. I was a bit confused, too, what was the point of the movie. Was it a historical piece, romantic story - it even had some comedy, as great tragedies often have. Mesmer seems to fail, although in real life he actually did cure people. And then he said his bit about how much pain there is in the world and how he could not bare not to be able to do anything to relieve it. And there was the point; that's why Dennis Potter, already dying, wrote the script this way. Even the kissing scene, which to many people seems very romantic and sexy, seemed sad to me. As if Mesmer couldn't believe something like that really happens to him. Even the ending made sense, then. This is a man, whose heart is aching to do something good in a world filled with pain and cruelty, selfishness and ignorance, but fails because one man isn't enough. Even the one he cures isn't saved, because the world doesn't understand what he was trying to do, what he was trying to make people see. Dennis Potter's testament, maybe? Oh yes, Rickman was born to wear cloaks (see Snape and Sheriff of Nottingham) and white ruffles around his throat, Amanda Ooms is lovely and the acting and the sceneries are great. And to remind, why Rickman is so great as a villain, he gets to throw the boy down the stairs. Suddenly a burst of energy and passion, making the character even more complicated, more human - because that's what Rickman does at his best: complete, complicated, deeply human characters. It's a very different kind of movie and many may not like it, but it's well worth watching. One gets to see an actor like Rickman far too little, and Dennis Potter was an excellent writer, even if this wasn't his best script. I loved it. It was very different from the super hero and cartoon character movies. We need to be reminded of real humanity and the fragility of people this way, because there seems to be very little room for compassion, pity and understanding in today's world.
|