In Love and War

Rating:
Summary: Well done despite historical inaccuracies
Review: Curiosity after reading "A Farewell to Arms" led to the diaries of Agnes von Kurowsky and ultimately to Sir Attenborough's film. The fact that the film takes some liberties with the actual timeline of the story (Agnes' assignments, her non-existent reunion with Hemingway in Missouri), the film itself was heartbreakingly beautiful. Chris O'Donnell did a fine job as the young Ernest Hemingway, but I wonder why the vibrant, flirtatious Aggie was played with such serious somberness by Sandra Bullock? The Agnes we read about in the book was indeed a serious and committed nurse, but her personality was the polar opposite of the film portrayal. This is not to say that Sandra Bullock is a bad actress - I just think the direction for her character was wrong.

Ernest Hemingway clearly loved Agnes von Kurowsky with a passion that could only be fulfilled on the written page. For both parties involved, the timing of the love affair was ill-fated.

Rating:
Summary: Well done despite historical inaccuracies
Review: Curiosity after reading "A Farewell to Arms" led to the diaries of Agnes von Kurowsky and ultimately to Sir Attenborough's film. The fact that the film takes some liberties with the actual timeline of the story (Agnes' assignments, her non-existent reunion with Hemingway in Missouri), the film itself was heartbreakingly beautiful. Chris O'Donnell did a fine job as the young Ernest Hemingway, but I wonder why the vibrant, flirtatious Aggie was played with such serious somberness by Sandra Bullock? The Agnes we read about in the book was indeed a serious and committed nurse, but her personality was the polar opposite of the film portrayal. This is not to say that Sandra Bullock is a bad actress - I just think the direction for her character was wrong.

Ernest Hemingway clearly loved Agnes von Kurowsky with a passion that could only be fulfilled on the written page. For both parties involved, the timing of the love affair was ill-fated.

Rating:
Summary: Well done despite historical inaccuracies
Review: Curiosity after reading "A Farewell to Arms" led to the diaries of Agnes von Kurowsky and ultimately to Sir Attenborough's film. The fact that the film takes some liberties with the actual timeline of the story (Agnes' assignments, her non-existent reunion with Hemingway in Missouri), the film itself was heartbreakingly beautiful. Chris O'Donnell did a fine job as the young Ernest Hemingway, but I wonder why the vibrant, flirtatious Aggie was played with such serious somberness by Sandra Bullock? The Agnes we read about in the book was indeed a serious and committed nurse, but her personality was the polar opposite of the film portrayal. This is not to say that Sandra Bullock is a bad actress - I just think the direction for her character was wrong.

Ernest Hemingway clearly loved Agnes von Kurowsky with a passion that could only be fulfilled on the written page. For both parties involved, the timing of the love affair was ill-fated.

Rating:
Summary: medium
Review: I give it 2 1/2 stars. Why? This film could have been a hit if it would have got better more experienced history actors and a better script. It doesn't keep your attention at all. I real dissapointment. If you are looking for a good Sandra Bullock movie, rent While You Were Sleeping!

Rating:
Summary: Wear a gas mask while watching this movie, 'cause it smells.
Review: I had just finished studying World War I when I decided to rent this movie. In addition, I really liked Sandra Bullock and Chris O'Donnell, so I said, "Hey, why not?" Aftermath of the movie: mass-destruction, far as the eye can see.

Sandra Bullock and Chris O'Donnell should really stick with comedy (or in the latter's case, action). I hate to say this, but they both really stunk. The beginning seemed promising, especially as we got to know the hospital residents. But then Hemingway (O'Donnell) had to start acting like a butt-head, and then the love affair...and then the ending! Jeez louise, it stunk the skunks out of their burrows. Okay, okay, there's ONE good point about the movie...it'll keep meaningless sex and bad-ending lovers busy for two hours. If you're not one of those people, then for crying out loud, run for the hills!

Rating:
Summary: Woe to Critics
Review: I have come to one conclusion over the years...I will never agree with professional critics. Movies they highly praised, I have walked out on. Movies they dislike I have fell in love with. Case in point, the movie, In Love and War, was one the critics bombed. However, I found this to be a beautiful, period piece, which gave me a glimpse into the events that formed Ernest Hemingway's adult life. Personally, I felt the actors did a fine job. The script was wonderful. I would highly recommend it to anyone.

Rating:
Summary: I Would Have Given It No Stars
Review: I recently rented this video about two days ago and let me say that this was a horrible movie. Bullock tries to hard to become a caring nurse but turns out to be a unemotional and untouching female. The friendships are unrealistic for that time period and so is the love affair.

There was some interesting parts in the beginning but they ended up dissolving by the first ten mins. The book is so much better and should be read before you listen to my opinoin. Please turn to the literature and not to this lifeless movie. This movie has a good point though, it will not stick to you after you are done watching it.

Rating:
Summary: Touching and Riveting
Review: I think this movie is the best I have ever seen in years. I don't know what hit those critics. I found it amusing as I watched Ernest Hemingway in his early years and Agnes von Kurowski fighting off the would-be master's charm. I was also touched by the bond that held the two together in the midst of the one of the world's roughest wars, World War One. Chris O'Donnell was charming and Sandra Bullock dazzling. It is a riveting romantic film that I think everyone should watch.

Rating:
Summary: In Love and War
Review: I was first struck my the musical score which was so rich and
colorful. Add to that the superb performances on the parts
of Sandra Bullock and Chris O'Donnell and you have a winner. It is therefore no suprise that the film won high honors. I think Sir Richard Attenborough's direction was suberb in every sense of the word. Such an evocotave story with war as a backdrop truly brought forth an emotional tension that is hard to describe. I also thought the supporting actors must have been hand picked because they fitted so easily in to the very fabric of the film. I certainly give this film a roaring "Five Star"
rating.

Rating:
Summary: At last, a romantic fim worth watching!
Review: I was honestly and completely moved by this film. It was beautifuly directed with fantastic performances by Sandra Bullock and Chris O'Donnel. Their chemistry is so good that one effortlessly feels the increasing sexual tension in merely seeing Chris O'Donnel lovingly place his hands on Sandra Bullock's shoulders-demonstrating that when it comes to true screen romance; less is more. This is not to say that 'In Love and War' is devoid of passion; it depicts a love affair at it's most passionate and magical whilst still maintaining an beauty and mystery. In short, bravo Ms Bullock and Mr O'Donnel! Their sensitive and touching portrayal of two complex characters was a joy to watch, and quite frankly I find it almost unbelievable that one could describe this film as anything other than a beautiful love story; one that is as tragic as it is passionate. Not since seeing Richard Chamberlain and Rachel Ward in 'The Thorn Birds'have I been so thoroughly engrossed in a love story. This is a must see for anyone who has lost faith in the Film Industry's ability to produce great romantic films. You'll laugh,you'll cry, you'll smile and sigh...and then watch it all over again!!