Wonderland

Rating:
Summary: One of the best films of 2000....
Review: A small jewel of a film, gritty in look, deep in its exploration of isolation, sibling relationships and human frailty, Winterbottom, who has been largely overlooked in the US, is one of the most deft of the younger British filmmakers. The fundamental themes of the film- relationships of all sorts, closeness and isolation, and life's tenuous balance between despair and faith (not in the religious sense), are aptly explored with humor and tender sarcasm.

The film was shot with a wonderfully dark grainy look, employing handheld cameras under natural lighting conditions, showing us a gritty London few films have. This is not a bright and shiny "Notting Hill"! Some of the cinematography in the film, especially the nights scenes, is just top notch. The film is as visually striking as Soderbergh's "Traffic".

The lead actresses are all terrific, but Gina McKee is truly memorable, portraying the tremendous loneliness, yet touching hopefulness, of her character in her finest performance to date.

Rating:
Summary: It's naturallity makes it stand out
Review: At the beginning , Wonderland doesn't seem to have the right elements in order to fascinate the viewer . It's characters are ordinary , unappealing people : a woman who is so bitter about everything that led her own son away from home , a t.v-salesman who has isolated himself from all the people which surround him that even his own mother can't help but confessing that " ... It feels like i have a stranger in my own house " , a divorced hairdresser with a teenage boy and an imature ex-husband she has to put up with . All of them are inperfect , all of them have insecurities and all of them face various kinds of troubles everyday . As minutes go by though something strange happends . Remember those unappealing people we were talking about ? Well , slowly as we get to know them we start to like them . They all feel so familiar to us , they could easily be our next door neighbours . Winterbottom studies his heroes very carefully and manages to capture the feeling of the daily mess we all have faced before . His movie is set in Southern London , a place he presents like it's some kind of a secret garden with lost souls in it trying to find their peace of mind . What makes Wonderland work so well is also the fact that it's being carried by an unfamiliar to most of us yet highly talented group of actors . Some of them had small parts in relatively more known pictures ( N.Hill , Shooting Fish ) , most of them we meet for the first time . Finally the music is absolutely brilliant , especially those wonderfull pianno parts that it's almost impossible to the viewer to imagine Wonderland withought this particular soundtrack .

Rating:
Summary: Excellent
Review: I avoid the "grade inflation" so prevalent at this site. There are few movies I rate "5", but this one certainly deserves it. It has the feel of Magnolia, but with more subtlety. Wonderland depicts modern urban alienation, but with tremendous human compassion and artfullness instead of cold philosophy or polemics. The directing and photography are both top-notch. The occasional visual gimmick works because it is employed only where appropriate. Unlike Magnolia, the several characters intermix throughout the movie. Our understanding of the them is established with impressive economy. The only criticisms I have are the several instances of indistinct dialogue (I'm thankful for subtitles) and the lack of extras on the DVD.

Rating:
Summary: Excellent
Review: I avoid the "grade inflation" so prevalent at this site. There are few movies I rate "5", but this one certainly deserves it. It has the feel of Magnolia, but with more subtlety. Wonderland depicts modern urban alienation, but with tremendous human compassion and artfullness instead of cold philosophy or polemics. The directing and photography are both top-notch. The occasional visual gimmick works because it is employed only where appropriate. Unlike Magnolia, the several characters intermix throughout the movie. Our understanding of the them is established with impressive economy. The only criticisms I have are the several instances of indistinct dialogue (I'm thankful for subtitles) and the lack of extras on the DVD.

Rating:
Summary: INDEPENDENT FILM HYPE
Review: Just because you have a camera and a credit card does not mean that you're a trendy independent filmmaker. There are those that gush over these little low budget films - instant 5 star review because it was made without studio backing. There are indie films that are amazing - Reservoir Dogs, Donnie Darko, etc. that worthy of praise. However, Wonderland is pure boredom coupled with that grainy look and a shaky hand-held camera - it looks cheap, the acting is poor and the story goes nowhere and stays there.

Rating:
Summary: INDEPENDENT FILM HYPE
Review: Just because you have a camera and a credit card does not mean that you're a trendy independent filmmaker. There are those that gush over these little low budget films - instant 5 star review because it was made without studio backing. There are indie films that are amazing - Reservoir Dogs, Donnie Darko, etc. that worthy of praise. However, Wonderland is pure boredom coupled with that grainy look and a shaky hand-held camera - it looks cheap, the acting is poor and the story goes nowhere and stays there.

Rating:
Summary: Raw, honest and simply beautiful.
Review: Set in south London at the end of the last century, Michael Winterbottom's Wonderland follows a few days in the lives and loves of three twentysomething working-class sisters (Gina Mckee, Shirley Henderson and Canadian actress Molly Parker who are all excellent). Winterbottom's free-form directorial style is reminiscent of mid-'70's Altman/Rudolph ensemble work like Welcome To L.A.
And If the intimate use of camera and razor-sharp editing are not enough, Michael Nyman provides the film with one of the best music scores in recent memory (or perhaps since his work on Gattaca).
Paul Thomas Anderson probably wept the day he realized just how gracefully one can absorb the spirit of Short Cuts without drifting to the contrived, incoherent excesses of Magnolia.

Rating:
Summary: A review that begins with gusto but tapers off at the end.
Review: The technique of ensemble casting has always been a bit of a risk. Instead of focusing on one massive character played by a big-name actor, a collection of lesser-known actors inhabit the story of a film, with sometimes only mere glimpses of their lives offered to the audience. This is easily done badly.

And though 'Wonderland' does it beautifully, it is a bit of an oddball film. Handheld cameras using a variety of different film stocks provoke that feeling of anxiety that most gloss as 'grittiness'. This is not a gritty film, but a cathartic one. As each character floats through life, the tension that builds around them can only be purged through tragedy or incident; some slap in the face that awakens each of them to the realities of living, not unlike the frog shower in 'Magnolia'.

So...yeah, you should watch this film.

Rating:
Summary: Winterbottom's wonderful Wonderland
Review: This may be the best film of 2000 (at least that's when it was released in Australia). Whilst film-makers like P.T. Anderson have made admirable attempts at personal drama in the last few years, and Mike Leigh continues to tell us that no-one suffers like the poor (as if we didn't know that), Michael Winterbottom has re-defined the genres. This is English kitchen sink drama without the tired clichés of class wars, which have seemed a bit anachronistic since the fall of the Tories. Shot in a stunning cinemascope (1:2.35) and available light, with the tiniest of crews, this is London as you've only seen it if you've seen it for yourself. The cast shines. I defy anyone to make it through this film without falling in love with Gina McKee. That's not to say that Shirley Henderson and Molly Parker are anything less than charming. Ian Hart is wonderfully moronic, as Stuart Townsend is wonderfully creepy. Keep an eye out for the beautifully natural performance of David Fahm as Franklyn. Jack Shepherd, Kika Markham and John Simm round out the main cast with equally powerful performances. A great script from first time screen-writer Lawrence Coriat. Michael Nyman turns out his most subtle and restrained music score yet. Michael Winterbottom is turning out to be the Stanley Kubrick of the 21st century. Who else has been able to jump form one genre to another with such ease and grace? This is a compelling film, well worth having your own copy of.

Rating:
Summary: What It Is.
Review: Watching this film, I was struck at the ambition of the film maker. A small family drama is told in the large scope of a sprawling city. This story of three sisters, their parents, their lovers, and their neighbors is a messy, yet elegantly nuanced slice of life. The acting is natural. No character is perfect and the exposition of the story is quiet and imprecise. The viewer is bound by the small details of the characters' lives. The city of London is not just a landscape, but an entity unto itself, complete with its own music.

For better of worse, the film lacks centrality and it is hard to empathize with every character. The murkiness of the family backstory is frustrating at times. Attempting to apply a moral construct to every sequence of the film is useless. To me, this movie had strong echoes of Mike Leigh's films.

Does the movie work? Sort of. Are the charcters revealed in a satisfying manner? Yes. Is the film's arc and execution admirable? Yes. Is the movie enjoyable? Not really.

The actors did a tremendous job. Gina McKee is fine as Nadya, the emotional touchstone of the film. Canadian Molly Parker does credit to her English accent. My particular favorite performance is that of Shirley Henderson (Bridget Jones, Harry Potter). She is wonderfully natural as the cheerful, tarty single-mom sister.

All in all, this film is better than fine but not great.