<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: Stupid movie that made no sense!
Review: A movie the whole family can enjoy. My little sister loves this movie. And it teaches you some important lessons.
Rating:
Summary: Stupid movie that made no sense!
Review: Dan Haggerty was the best actor in that movie and did a good job acting in it. On the other hand it was poorly written and the rest of the actors and actresses in the movie did a terrible job. It made no sense at all. Some lousy acting kids got mysteriously sent back in time to save a mountain from being blown into pieces. It's funny how the kids were trying to save the mountain from being blown when it already existed in the 20th century. Then the writer made a lousy attempt to make the movie funny by making the kids have all sorts of gadgets and gizmos from the future. It could have been a great movie with Dan Haggerty since I thought some of his earlier movies were great, but the plot was terrible and the "kids from the future" made it even worse.
Rating:
Summary: The scenery's the star of this lousy film
Review: I never thought Dan Haggerty could act . . . now I know for sure! And he was the best on in the entire cast of so-called actors.
Sure the story has a politically correct message, but the challenge is sticking with it to the end. This poorly written, poorly acted, low budget affair would have been a total waste of time except for some great scenery. Save your money.
Rating:
Summary: The scenery's the star of this lousy film
Review: I never thought Dan Haggerty could act . . . now I know for sure! And he was the best on in the entire cast of so-called actors. Sure the story has a politically-correct message, but the challenge is sticking with it to the end. This poorly written, poorly acted, low budget affair would have been a total waste of time except for some great scenery. Save your money.
Rating:
Summary: A dumb movie
Review: I think Dan Hagerty is one of the worst actors I have ever seen he was even bad at acting in his show Grizzly Adams but when you compare that to Grizzly Mountain Grizzly Adams seems like an award winner. I think Grizzly Mountain is one of the worst movies I have ever seen.
Rating: 
Summary: A well-acted family movie.
Review: In this movie (very similar, in atmosphere and personality, to GRIZZLY ADAMS), two modern-day Oregon children are transported back to 1870 via a cave while on a camping trip. There, they help a mountain man named Jeremiah save the mountain from a greedy businessman and his cohorts. The children are compelled to help Jeremiah, because if the mountain is destroyed, so is their hope of returning to the 1990s. The character of Jeremiah is very much like Grizzly Adams: likable and well able to take care of himself in the mountains. The children are well able to handle themselves, and in their efforts to do so, they sometimes try Jeremiah's patience. All in all, it's a good movie. In a way, it's a politically correct movie: the theme is that it's wrong to develop mountains or any other wild areas for business purposes. Political correctness aside, I give this movie a thumbs-up for family quality. And but for one swear word, used once, I would rate it G.
Rating:
Summary: Un-bear-able
Review: Jimmy (Miko Hughes) is so upset at the abuse of a bear cub by a cruel circus trainer that he goes back in time to get help. I'd say that's going above and beyond the call of duty (what, no listing for the Humane Society in the Yellow Pages?), but he plucks a mountain man named Jeremiah (Dan Haggerty) from the 1800s and brings him back to modern times to kick some carny butt and save the little grizzly. In the 2000 sequel, Escape to Grizzly Mountain, two city kids (played by Dylan Haggerty and Nicole Lund) find themselves in the nineteenth century, face-to-whiskers with Jeremiah (Haggerty, again) and his bruin buddy, Jack. Low-budget fare, only worth seeing for fans of Dan.
Staci Layne Wilson
Author of Staci's Guide to Animal Movies
<< 1 >>
| 
