Rating: 
Summary: Just plain bad
Review: This movie was nothing like what was shown in the trailer, or what was desscibed on the back of the DVD case... if this wasnt a free rental from blockbuster, id be pissed off...
Rating: 
Summary: HOW THE HELL DID MORGAN FREEMAN LAND IN THIS MOVIE?
Review: TWO FRIENDS ARE DRUG DEALERS IN WASHINGTON DC. WHEN ONE OF THEM SNITCHES ON THE OTHER, A STREET WAR STARTS. SHOCKINGLY, THE CREW OF THIS HOOD MOVIE HAPPENED TO GET MORGAN FREEMAN TO APPEAR IN THIS MOVIE. MORGAN FREEMAN, WHO IS BY FAR THE BEST ACTOR IN THE CAST, ACTUALLY HAS A SMALL ROLE. ALL HE DOES IS NARRATE, AND HE DOESN'T APPEAR UNTIL THE LAST 35 MINUTES OF THE MOVIE. THE FILM IS A LOT BETTER THAN WHAT THE REST OF Y'ALL SAY IT IS. IT HAS ENOUGH GOOD ACTING AND ENOUGH GOOD SCENES TO MAKE THIS RATE AS AN ACCEPTABLE MOVIE. IT'S DEFINITELY A NOTCH ABOVE A LOT OF THE OTHER HOOD MOVIES THAT'VE CAME OUT IN RECENT YEARS.
Rating:
Summary: why did they bother?
Review: Where to begin! This was one of the worst movies I've ever seen, and that's saying a lot. At least with most bad movies, you can usually tell there was some effort put into it. Not here. It seemed in some scenes that the actors blew their lines, so rather than re-shoot the scene, they over-dubbed it. And not very well. This was just a weak effort.The 'acting' in this movie was so bad it made the acting in 2 Fast 2 Furious seem oscar worthy. This piece of work was just a cliche--kind of a synthesis of all the bad Boyz N the Hood and Menace II Society knock-offs that have been made over the years. I wouldn't normally write reviews, but I felt I had to do my part to warn everybody about this movie...
Rating:
Summary: Guilty By Association
Review: Why Morgan Freeman starred in this low budget terrible film I shall never understand it must be the biggest mistake of his career. The camera shoots are so poor it's like a home video. The story line, sorry what story line, there isn't any forget what it says on the back of the DVD cover. Anyone buying this film should be offerred a full refund. The film should be rated -10 star it's that bad. My advise is don't buy it.
Rating:
Summary: Don't waste your cash
Review: WORST MOVIE EVER! "Guilty By Association" (2003) Staring Morgan Freeman..... for 5 minutes!
I've never felt more ripped off by a movie. They made this piece of ____ on tape out to be a Morgan Freeman crime thriller and it turned out to be another reason why rappers are the lowest rung on the evolutionary ladder.
Rating:
Summary: I Feel Guilty Just For Having Watched It
Review: Wow. When I rented this movie, I knew that it might be bad, but I never expected a train wreck like this. It's not so much that the script was boring, but the way the movie was executed was somewhat bizarre. People's behavior (the police in particular) just didn't make much sense. I expected a certain level of quality given that the movie included Morgan Freeman, but I was unpleasantly surprised. His character wasn't particularly interesting or important. I have a suspicion that in the original script, Lieutenant Redding was a very minor character, but when they landed Morgan Freeman the Lieutenant was given more face time, though no more relevance. If you watch the trailer, it appears that the movie is centered on him. As it turns out, the plot and outcome of the movie would be the same if his character had never existed.
| 
