Rating: 
Summary: Silly, I don't really use it, I bought it for the bottle!
Review: I had been waiting for this movie to hit the theaters after having read about its showing at Sundance, and was quite surprised to see that it went directly to dvd. Especially with such a deep cast. At first I couldn't tell whether it was a comedy or docudrama. Having seen it I still wonder. Rather than one storyline this movie is about several. There is the designer (Rita Wilson) whose partner (Leslie Mann) has left her to seek fortune elsewhere. There is the Versace-esque Italian designer (Paul Sirvino) who must face health and family crises. There is the photographer (Jared Harris) juggling work and personal relationship. Then there's the magazine editor (Joanne Baron) whose abandoned daughter (Michelle Williams) suddenly reappears in her life. Director Rymer wants to give the audience an inside look at the fashion industry, and he does accomplish this on several levels. The designer's assistants following her everywhere; the brief but very real segment of shuffling seating assignments for a fashion show; the editor's assistant (Angela Bettis) screening for her worshipped boss. Some of the exchanges are readily identifiable to all (photographer and girlfriend), some are true-to-life but foreign to those outside the industry (designer and her assistants) but some are so last season (conglomerate quoting Henry James). What this film needs is more attitude. We see the backstabbing and false niceties, but the only part of the movie that reflects the snobbishness prevalent in the industry is at the reception desk at the magazine office. Those without first-hand experience with New Yorkers might doubt the dialogue, but it is largely faithful. It is however also highly inconsistent--at times the scenes, the ones that worked, seemed unscripted (reportedly there was some improvisation) and at times it is so spoofy goofy you wonder how many different writers were behind it. Because of the quick pace, you pay attention to the exchanges and not overly scrutinize the acting. You won't get to see too much of the inner workings of the fashion industry, but you could familiarize yourself with its personalities. If you don't sigh paying two bucks for a bottle of Evian, then surely you can have some fun with this movie. Summary: Like New York and the fashion industry, fast and fun, but lots of loose threads. Note: Don't be fooled! Carmen Electra's name appearing on the main credits (i.e., cover of the dvd) is ludicrous and an obvious marketing ploy. She appears in just a couple of scenes and a total of maybe five minutes in the movie. The same could be said with several others...Estella Warren, prominently featured as the poster girl for this release, is merely in an opening scene and a closing one. One glaring omission in the main credits but a standout in the movie is Jared Harris, who gave a very convincing performance as the fashion photographer having to deal with egos on the job and go home to a girlfriend whose demands he can't quite satisfy. DVD note: very standard fare, no bonus material, which is disappointing, considering there must have been a ton of unused footage.
Rating:
Summary: Silly, I don't really use it, I bought it for the bottle!
Review: I had been waiting for this movie to hit the theaters after having read about its showing at Sundance, and was quite surprised to see that it went directly to dvd. Especially with such a deep cast. At first I couldn't tell whether it was a comedy or docudrama. Having seen it I still wonder. Rather than one storyline this movie is about several. There is the designer (Rita Wilson) whose partner (Leslie Mann) has left her to seek fortune elsewhere. There is the Versace-esque Italian designer (Paul Sirvino) who must face health and family crises. There is the photographer (Jared Harris) juggling work and personal relationship. Then there's the magazine editor (Joanne Baron) whose abandoned daughter (Michelle Williams) suddenly reappears in her life. Director Rymer wants to give the audience an inside look at the fashion industry, and he does accomplish this on several levels. The designer's assistants following her everywhere; the brief but very real segment of shuffling seating assignments for a fashion show; the editor's assistant (Angela Bettis) screening for her worshipped boss. Some of the exchanges are readily identifiable to all (photographer and girlfriend), some are true-to-life but foreign to those outside the industry (designer and her assistants) but some are so last season (conglomerate quoting Henry James). What this film needs is more attitude. We see the backstabbing and false niceties, but the only part of the movie that reflects the snobbishness prevalent in the industry is at the reception desk at the magazine office. Those without first-hand experience with New Yorkers might doubt the dialogue, but it is largely faithful. It is however also highly inconsistent--at times the scenes, the ones that worked, seemed unscripted (reportedly there was some improvisation) and at times it is so spoofy goofy you wonder how many different writers were behind it. Because of the quick pace, you pay attention to the exchanges and not overly scrutinize the acting. You won't get to see too much of the inner workings of the fashion industry, but you could familiarize yourself with its personalities. If you don't sigh paying two bucks for a bottle of Evian, then surely you can have some fun with this movie. Summary: Like New York and the fashion industry, fast and fun, but lots of loose threads. Note: Don't be fooled! Carmen Electra's name appearing on the main credits (i.e., cover of the dvd) is ludicrous and an obvious marketing ploy. She appears in just a couple of scenes and a total of maybe five minutes in the movie. The same could be said with several others...Estella Warren, prominently featured as the poster girl for this release, is merely in an opening scene and a closing one. One glaring omission in the main credits but a standout in the movie is Jared Harris, who gave a very convincing performance as the fashion photographer having to deal with egos on the job and go home to a girlfriend whose demands he can't quite satisfy. DVD note: very standard fare, no bonus material, which is disappointing, considering there must have been a ton of unused footage.
Rating: 
Summary: cheap perfume
Review: Date: 3/2/2003
Summary: Incredible film; bears watching more than once! A review in IMDB can't say it better! - Quote-Excerpt: If you've ever been around "the fashion world," or grown up reading "fashion magazines," you will understand EXACTLY what this film portrays: "Life, Exactly As They Know It!" The "choppiness" and "vagueness" objected to by other reviewers is EXACTLY why this is such a great film, why this is such a "Real" film: anyone who has ever been around "these people" will see exactly how the dialogue mirrors "real life" in the fashion / magazine biz. The "one real scene" between Hemmingway and the photographer (as described by another reviewer) is precisely showing how rare and difficult a "real" moment is to find. In fact, they are ALL "real scenes," wherein lies their power. The scene where the daughter, (not "drug addled," by the way, as described by another reviewer) who is the antithesis of "fashion," describes how reading magazines "makes her feel bad about herself" and her mother's instant rejection and leaving of the restaurant, is telling precisely the truth. And then any woman who rejects "fashion standards" is left alone at the table. The emptiness of the life and the constant ebb and flow of current, changing tides, makes any real or lasting connection impossible. This is even alluded to with Paul Sorvino in one discussion about going to the hip-hop look: something to the effect of "in Europe, classic can last... in America, you have to keep moving!" Then the hip hop boys point out that the baggy-pants hip hop look was born from poverty and "10 brothers and sisters, but the suburban kids will follow" even at an unaffordable $150.00 a pop! But that's the game!" Until I saw this film, I never understood why I was not accepted - could never connect with anyone in the "Fashion Crowd" when I lived in Paris and New York. Now I know why. What was there to connect to? People who "didn't want to be nothing" People who made their living preying on others creativity and beauty, at the cost of making everyone else feel like "less?" An industry that feeds on people's insecurities and wanting to "fit in?" I liked the daughter the best. She stood alone, sad and lost, but stayed true to herself in the end and went on home, wherever that might be. There are so many profound statements in the dialogue of this film that it would be worth printing every one of them here. Perhaps some film buff / college student might write a dissertation on this film alone. Who sang the beautiful music with hip hop and opera combined? I would love to have a music CD of the film, and am buying the DVD just so I can "listen to the film" again and again. Hope to see more. Thank you all! Great job!
Rating: 
Summary: Excellent Film*****
Review: Date: 3/2/2003
Summary: Incredible film; bears watching more than once! A review in IMDB can't say it better! - Quote-Excerpt: If you've ever been around "the fashion world," or grown up reading "fashion magazines," you will understand EXACTLY what this film portrays: "Life, Exactly As They Know It!" The "choppiness" and "vagueness" objected to by other reviewers is EXACTLY why this is such a great film, why this is such a "Real" film: anyone who has ever been around "these people" will see exactly how the dialogue mirrors "real life" in the fashion / magazine biz. The "one real scene" between Hemmingway and the photographer (as described by another reviewer) is precisely showing how rare and difficult a "real" moment is to find. In fact, they are ALL "real scenes," wherein lies their power. The scene where the daughter, (not "drug addled," by the way, as described by another reviewer) who is the antithesis of "fashion," describes how reading magazines "makes her feel bad about herself" and her mother's instant rejection and leaving of the restaurant, is telling precisely the truth. And then any woman who rejects "fashion standards" is left alone at the table. The emptiness of the life and the constant ebb and flow of current, changing tides, makes any real or lasting connection impossible. This is even alluded to with Paul Sorvino in one discussion about going to the hip-hop look: something to the effect of "in Europe, classic can last... in America, you have to keep moving!" Then the hip hop boys point out that the baggy-pants hip hop look was born from poverty and "10 brothers and sisters, but the suburban kids will follow" even at an unaffordable $150.00 a pop! But that's the game!" Until I saw this film, I never understood why I was not accepted - could never connect with anyone in the "Fashion Crowd" when I lived in Paris and New York. Now I know why. What was there to connect to? People who "didn't want to be nothing" People who made their living preying on others creativity and beauty, at the cost of making everyone else feel like "less?" An industry that feeds on people's insecurities and wanting to "fit in?" I liked the daughter the best. She stood alone, sad and lost, but stayed true to herself in the end and went on home, wherever that might be. There are so many profound statements in the dialogue of this film that it would be worth printing every one of them here. Perhaps some film buff / college student might write a dissertation on this film alone. Who sang the beautiful music with hip hop and opera combined? I would love to have a music CD of the film, and am buying the DVD just so I can "listen to the film" again and again. Hope to see more. Thank you all! Great job!
Rating: 
Summary: GOOD FILM POOR MARKETING
Review: I am convinced that the reason for put-down hostility toward this movie is the same reason why THE LAST KISS did poorly in the USA...misrepresentative trailer and marketing. (in the case of that movie the American distributor sold it as a comedy so American critics were not satisfied with it; while back in Italy the love story was the marketing focus).
Back to PERFUME...
Remember the film is made first then someone else decides how to present it. The problem is that they establish a specific expectation that can harm an audience's response based upon an inaccurate prior notion of a movie's goal and purpose.
I viewed this movie with an open mind and did not watch the trailer until afterward. I enjoyed the film. It is far better than I anticipated. Then I saw the trailer and realised why such loathing was thrown at PERFUME the trailer implies some kind of tabloid scandal expose of the Fashion business. PERFUME is NOT that. It is however a very good character study. The actors improvised their own dialogue and although I like some characters more than others that is reasonable when dealing with this kind of ensemble.
This is also a case of herd opinionism...how PERFUME is dismissed while LOST IN TRANSLATION and BEFORE SUNSET win awards. PERFUME is better than either of those.
Yes, maybe this would have done better if made as a TV experiment for SHOWTIME or HBO. Maybe home viewing enables the intimacy better. Either way don't believe the nay-sayers.
Rating:
Summary: Um.... what is this movie about again?
Review: I watched this movie not to long ago with one of the guys in my dorm and we were both at an extreme loss as to what the movie was all about. There quite literaly was NO plot what so ever. The acting was ok, no great or poor but ok however that does not make up for the very poor character development,lack of plot twists (aside from the dude dying from cancer there were none) and I was confused why they put Carmen Electra all over the over, the back and in the trailer when I only saw her for 15 secconds. I'm sorry but I don't think 15 secconds of Carmen is worth my time, I get more of her when I watch Battlebots before the first commercial break. I'm sorry but I can only say what a flop this is and hope the producers think twice before releasing a script they deam to be 'artistic' to the unsuspecting general public. All in all a bad buy.
Rating:
Summary: Um.... what is this movie about again?
Review: I watched this movie not to long ago with one of the guys in my dorm and we were both at an extreme loss as to what the movie was all about. There quite literaly was NO plot what so ever. The acting was ok, no great or poor but ok however that does not make up for the very poor character development,lack of plot twists (aside from the dude dying from cancer there were none) and I was confused why they put Carmen Electra all over the over, the back and in the trailer when I only saw her for 15 secconds. I'm sorry but I don't think 15 secconds of Carmen is worth my time, I get more of her when I watch Battlebots before the first commercial break. I'm sorry but I can only say what a flop this is and hope the producers think twice before releasing a script they deam to be 'artistic' to the unsuspecting general public. All in all a bad buy.
Rating:
Summary: If you want an hour and a half of improv, this is for you
Review: The little caveat at the beginning of the credits should also be on the DVD box, "All actors dialogue was improvised". Wow, does that certainly make a difference. Perfume had an excellent cast including Jared Harris, Jeff Goldblum, Mariska Hargitay, Rita Wilson, Paul Sorvino, Peter Gallagher, et al, in roles that would have been fantastic if fleshed out. However, the movie fell flat due to choppy and hesitant dialogue, save two scenes that were excellent and seemed lifted from an actual movie. This movie doesn't even reach the level of a good documentary, but is more like sitting through an improv class. In my opinion it's not worth sitting through for the very few reedeming moments. Unless you want to see how well some of your favorite actors perform when improvising the entire movie.
Rating:
Summary: If you want an hour and a half of improv, this is for you
Review: The little caveat at the beginning of the credits should also be on the DVD box, "All actors dialogue was improvised". Wow, does that certainly make a difference. Perfume had an excellent cast including Jared Harris, Jeff Goldblum, Mariska Hargitay, Rita Wilson, Paul Sorvino, Peter Gallagher, et al, in roles that would have been fantastic if fleshed out. However, the movie fell flat due to choppy and hesitant dialogue, save two scenes that were excellent and seemed lifted from an actual movie. This movie doesn't even reach the level of a good documentary, but is more like sitting through an improv class. In my opinion it's not worth sitting through for the very few reedeming moments. Unless you want to see how well some of your favorite actors perform when improvising the entire movie.
Rating:
Summary: cheap perfume
Review: This movie was absolutely terrible. They were trying to work the whole "artsy" angle, you know- New York and fashion mixed with culture. I didn't even know when I started to watch the movie that the actors were improving, but I didn't need to- it was a dead give-a-way! The actors had uncomfortable silences almost in a "Curb Your Enthusiasm" way, but no where near entertaining. Let me just roll my eyes and say "Find a (good) script and stick to it!"
| 
