Home :: DVD :: Drama :: General  

African American Drama
Classics
Crime & Criminals
Cult Classics
Family Life
Gay & Lesbian
General

Love & Romance
Military & War
Murder & Mayhem
Period Piece
Religion
Sports
Television
David and Lisa

David and Lisa

List Price: $14.98
Your Price: $13.48
Product Info Reviews

<< 1 2 >>

Rating: 4 stars
Summary: Sensitive Portrayal of Mental Illness
Review: "David and Lisa" is a touching portrayal of adolescent psychosis and love for the first time. Kudos To Frank and Eleanor Perry for not exploiting mental illness by the restraint in which they tell this story and not resorting to the histrionics that lesser hands would have resorted to. Keir Dullea is fine as David, the youth with OCD, though I thought him a little mature for the role and a little Brooks Brothers. Janet Margolin is a revelation as Lisa, the child-like teenage schizophrenic. Howard DaSilva delivers solid work as their sensitive psychiatrist. Unlike alot of social dramas of this period it holds up remarkably well.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: A Great Film, Years Ahead Of Its Time
Review: A few nights ago, I watched the "Oprah Winfrey Presents" made-for-TV remake of David and Lisa on ABC. What a disaster.

David and Lisa has always been one of my favorite movies. I saw it originally in 1962 when I was a sophomore in high school. (I will never forget . . . The dramatic tension was too much for Billy Levin, the friend I went to see it with . . . just as they touched at the grand finale of the movie, he burst into uncontrolled uproarious laughter. I thought the other people in the theater were going to kill him).

Anyway . . .

If Oprah Winfrey wanted "to introduce David and Lisa to a new generation of viewers" (as was stated in the prologue), why didn't she just show us all the original one (without commercials)! And who needed Oprah telling us all at the outset, "This movie is about the healing power of love." Hey, if the director couldn't get that across in two hours!

Keir Dullea, Janet Margolin, and Howard da Silva's performances were impeccable in the original. Sidney Poitier's performance (he played the doctor in last night's redo) ran the gamut of emotions from A to B. (I have always been an admirer of Howard da Silva's progressive credentials -- he was a leftist blacklisted by the McCarthyites in the 1950's -- his genuine caring and sincere humanity really came across on the silver screen.)

And maybe sweat just looks better in black and white, or maybe Dullea's raw gutsy portrayal was eons better than the polished frozen robot performance of Lukas Haas, but all in all there is no comparison. Last night's Lisa did a whole lot too much long-shot bunny-hopping around the set. The original director had the good sense to zero in on close-up after close-up of Janet Margolin's beautifully bedraggled fragility.

And what's with the added dialogue of the doctor saying to the mom, "We stopped blaming parents 20 years go." Sez who? I'm all for blaming the parents. The original movie really blasted away at the uptight parents for screwing up their kid. Right on. (I think Oprah might have added that line herself -- she probably spends a lot of time on daytime teevee telling parents not to blame themselves).

The new version had a lot of stuff about medication being balanced and how important meds were to certain of the patients progress -- none of that in the original.

They cut out one of the greatest scenes of the whole movie . . . the one at the train station where an uptight citizen lashes out at the kids, calling them "a bunch of screwballs spoiling the town." A really really important scene in terms of showing the discrimination faced by people with psychiatric disabilities, and the horrible pain it causes.

The new version also cut out the sensitively-drawn portrayal of a gay male character (David's chess partner), an overweight therapist, as well as a very strong hispanic character, turning him into just another disturbed anglo. Leaving us with whitebread. (Guess they didn't want to take any chances with the network that axed Ellen.)

When the mother is come on to by that particular character, David's "delusions of grandeur" speech (about the character's sexuality) is replaced by some ridiculous savage sexual assault going on on top of one of picnic tables in the background. That sure helps make viewers feel sympathetic to adolescents with psychiatric disabilities.

The new version had the female therapist crying in distress when Lisa ran away near the end of the movie. Give me a break! Kids are always running away from residential facilities.

There was something so real about the original version, and something so "Hollywood" about the new one -- no dramatic tension, no nothing.

The music in the original really added to the drama; not so the new version.

The original film was really a very beautiful fairytale about how messed up people can help each other out of their respective pits. Unfortunately, mythic metaphor though it be, it has never been true in my experience. Anytime I've met someone as screwed up as myself and thought Hey, this is it, we can just love each other and David and Lisa each other into better human beings and happier lives, it's never quite worked out that way, to say the least.

At least the original gave me the feeling that I could still dream. I still do love that myth.

The original 1962 version is fresh in my mind because I had just rented the video about a month ago. At the time, I couldn't help thinking that it was 35 years ahead of it's time. Maybe we should make that 45 . . .



Rating: 5 stars
Summary: You need a background in psychology to appreciate this film
Review: A poignant and revealing picture of two very troubled teenagers. This film is certainly not made for entertainment purposes; its made to educate us by showing an environment too few of us are aware of where an appallingly-large number exist and struggle. David's dream sequences depicted here are very imaginative and frightening. Great acting performances by Keir Dullea (did he make any other films besides this one and "2001-A Space Odyssey"?) and the late Janet Margolin and Howard DaSilva.

Rating: 4 stars
Summary: Maybe the first successful indie film
Review: As to the content and quality of this film, the other reviews here cover it really well. The thing I like about this film is that it was done well on an incredibly low budget. What I heard at the time is that the film was made for $50,000. An absurdly low figure, even in 1962. The crew had only one old Mitchell 35mm camera, so for every change of view, they literally had to pick up the camera and move it. This accounts also for the fade out to black at the end of each scene. The film is so artfully assembled that when you watch it, you are totally unaware of the limitations the crew had to deal with. I believe David and Lisa should be mandatory study for all the wannabe indie directors hitting the scene today.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: Really Beautiful!
Review: David (Keir Dullea) and Lisa (Janet Margolin) are beautiful, sweet, and sad in this strange mental drama. David's brooding truly broke my heart. And Lisa's innocence filled it up again. Together they seemed like one whole (slightly 'off') person.
This story is about love. About loving yourself when the world doesn't see your insides.

Really beautiful.
And David's Dreams were spectacular!

=^..^=

Rating: 2 stars
Summary: Very dated and dry. Only for the true indie film fan.
Review: I bought this movie on a whim with the knowledge that it was an early, and successful independent film. I took it home to watch it and I was very dissapointed to say the least.

I am big into indie films and this is NOT a timeless movie. The acting (perhaps good at the time) was not very good. The characters were stiff, and one dimensional. The music did not line up with the actions that were taking place (i.e. during the final scene where the plot supposedly gets resolved the music sounds as though a death scene is about to take place. During a scene of slow moving action, chase music is played).

The movie sets us up for the main plot (the love between David and Lisa), and then a few different sub-plots (the struggle between David & his mother, the conflict between David's mother and father). Those sub-plots NEVER get resolved.

This is a product of lazy, sloppy film-making and I recommend this to those who are only curious.

I was not impressed with this film that is supposedly an amazing work of art. It didn't seem 'real' enough. Perhaps this movie was good at the time but it's better off that it be left there, back where it belongs.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: david and lisa
Review: I had to laugh at one reviewer who noted the characters were stiff. Yes, in fact, at the beginning of the film, Keir Dullea, who plays an emotionally rigid and phobic man (detached, deeply angry and invested in his own brilliance) is quite stiff. That's the point. He's terrified of encountering feelings he cannot manage and, worse yet, of really expressing how angry he is at his controlling mother. Like "Rebel Without A Cause," young David feels tremendous angst in his family: He can't quite work out why his father allows himself to be belittled by his wife. Slowly, the relationship David develops with his therapist becomes the healthy, appropriate relationship he should have had with his father. It is this relationship that grows concurrently with and indeed, informs, his affection toward a very disturbed young woman, Lisa.

Now, I did not give the film 5 Stars because I felt Lisa's character, who speaks almost totally in rhyme, is rather unevolved. What the heck is this increasingly annoying "Tell me who do you see?" shtick all about? I wanted to know more about why this poor girl became the poster child for some hodge-podge, garden variety, mental illness. Is she struggling with some unresolved electral complex? Has her burgeoning sexuality sent her over the edge? Or has her internal turntable hit one heck of a glitch?

Ultimately, perhaps it doesn't really matter how she got this way only that she is able to forge a connection with David, whose patience for her comes from someone having patience with him. A nice nod in the direction of shrinks who really can make a difference.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: You need a background in psychology to appreciate this film
Review: I just saw "David and Lisa" and am buying the video for keeps. Never having heard of it I rented this film on an impulse. It was a most rewarding impulse. The brilliance of this film caught me completely off guard. This film now sits on my list of favorite films. The cinematography during certain scenes has a breathtaking ability to communicate the story through the lens alone. The screenplay is brilliant in every way conceivable. If you are a mental health professional you must see this film. David and Lisa is directed with restraint and brevity. Scenes end precisely when their message is communicated,and no longer. The acting is a gift to the viewer. The art design for the movie is poetic and powerful. This is one of the most seductive movies I have ever seen. This film moves the viewer along effortlessly. Am I raving about this film? Yes! I concur with the previous reviews that say that this film was ahead of its time. It is still relevant today, unlike many "issue" movies that become cliches and are painful to watch.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: Startling and Brilliant
Review: I just saw "David and Lisa" and am buying the video for keeps. Never having heard of it I rented this film on an impulse. It was a most rewarding impulse. The brilliance of this film caught me completely off guard. This film now sits on my list of favorite films. The cinematography during certain scenes has a breathtaking ability to communicate the story through the lens alone. The screenplay is brilliant in every way conceivable. If you are a mental health professional you must see this film. David and Lisa is directed with restraint and brevity. Scenes end precisely when their message is communicated,and no longer. The acting is a gift to the viewer. The art design for the movie is poetic and powerful. This is one of the most seductive movies I have ever seen. This film moves the viewer along effortlessly. Am I raving about this film? Yes! I concur with the previous reviews that say that this film was ahead of its time. It is still relevant today, unlike many "issue" movies that become cliches and are painful to watch.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!
Review: This film is absolutely beautiful in every sense. It is the story of two teenagers, David and Lisa, who are both in a home for mentally ill teens. David is obsessed with clocks and has a fear of being physically touched while Lisa can only speak in rhyme. The film covers the powerful bond that develops between David and Lisa. I think this film is wonderful. Both Keir Dullea (David) and the late Janet Margolin (Lisa) are brilliant! There is also a fine supporting cast. Overall I would say this is one of the finest films I have ever viewed.


<< 1 2 >>

© 2004, ReviewFocus or its affiliates