African American Heritage
Art & Artists
Biography
Comedy
Crime & Conspiracy
Gay & Lesbian
General
History
IMAX
International
Jewish Heritage
Military & War
Music & Performing Arts
Nature & Wildlife
Politics
Religion
Science & Technology
Series
Space Exploration
Sports
|
|
Horrors of the Black Museum |
List Price: $14.99
Your Price: $13.49 |
|
|
|
Product Info |
Reviews |
Rating: Summary: dull horror film Review: This film pretends to be different. Instead all it is is a dull excersive in a madman murdering people in unique ways. There is more dull talk than anything. This film was laughed at and dismissed at the time of its release. It would be wise to do the same today.
Rating: Summary: TIME CAN CHANGE YOUR MIND Review: When I first saw this 1959 movie in the theaters, I was a rather impressionable lad, so this movie really made a lasting impression in my mind, particularly the opening binocular scene. Now, over 40 years later (ouch, am I that old??), it comes across as a rather mild, sometimes yawning, offering. I think one of the problems the director and/or writer had is that they gave us no suspense in uncovering the killer's identity. Having Michael Gough in the lead of course lets horror fans know he's up to no good (which was surprising he was cast as Alfred in the first BATMAN movies). Also, they shouldn't have shown us Rick's Jekyll/Hyde persona so quickly. After that, it was just a matter of waiting to see how they'd get caught. Gough is in the Lee/Price/Karloff school of actors, although he has never achieved their immortal status of getting away with the ham. Graham Curnow is awful as Rick; June Cunningham is pitifully funny in her sexually repulsive shenanigans; and Shirley Anne Field acted like a Sandra Dee wannabe. All in all, a disillusionment, but still a campy journey back to the days of schlock horror movies.
Rating: Summary: TIME CAN CHANGE YOUR MIND Review: When I first saw this 1959 movie in the theaters, I was a rather impressionable lad, so this movie really made a lasting impression in my mind, particularly the opening binocular scene. Now, over 40 years later (ouch, am I that old??), it comes across as a rather mild, sometimes yawning, offering. I think one of the problems the director and/or writer had is that they gave us no suspense in uncovering the killer's identity. Having Michael Gough in the lead of course lets horror fans know he's up to no good (which was surprising he was cast as Alfred in the first BATMAN movies). Also, they shouldn't have shown us Rick's Jekyll/Hyde persona so quickly. After that, it was just a matter of waiting to see how they'd get caught. Gough is in the Lee/Price/Karloff school of actors, although he has never achieved their immortal status of getting away with the ham. Graham Curnow is awful as Rick; June Cunningham is pitifully funny in her sexually repulsive shenanigans; and Shirley Anne Field acted like a Sandra Dee wannabe. All in all, a disillusionment, but still a campy journey back to the days of schlock horror movies.
|
|
|
|