Rating: 
Summary: "Pulp Fiction" is undoubtedly the greatest movie ever.
Review: Need I say more
Rating:
Summary: #1 above all others
Review: When I say that this is my favorite film of all time, I mean it. "Casablanca" came it at a distant second. First I must dole out rebukes to every single slackjawed moron with a limited attention span who can't grasp the chronology of events. It is surprisingly simple, and if you need someone to walk you through it, stay out of the theaters altogether. I would also dare anyone to not stare in rapt attention when Samuel L. Jackson (as Jules Winnfield) recites his Ezekiel 25:17 to the scared witless Bret. For pure fun and escapism, this is the film. Then there's the brief missed connection romance between Vincent and Mia, which gives a wistfulness to the remainder of the film (especially when you see what happens to Vincent later. note: reading in the bathroom can be a poor idea). I can't truly explain every single reason why I love this film, but if you're mature enough to appreciate it, then you cannot pass up "Pulp Fiction" by Quentin Tarantino.
Rating:
Summary: The Best Quentin Tarantino Film!
Review: i think it is the best film written and produced by Quentin Tarantino, i've seen this movie about 10-12 times, and i really love it! :)
Rating:
Summary: Funny, intense, violent, thought-provoking,...
Review: Despite what some may say, Tarantino has written and directed an amazing, mature and substantial film, in what is one of the best movies of the past decade, and possibly of all time. Very rarely does a movie take so much to watch. The kind of movie that can have an entire audience laughing, but two minutes later, in utter silence and amazement. A stunning, tour-de-force acheivment, with an excellent cast, that should accredit praise to true movie-making talent.
Rating:
Summary: Noticed the Bandadge on the back of Marcellus' head?
Review: First of all, an awesome movie. Second, It seems that many of the people who write reviews have seen this movie numeruos times. Well, I have a little theory and I would like to see if anyone else has caught on to it. When Jackson and Travolta are in the guys' appartments retrieving Marcellus' briefcase, Travolta opens the breifcase and there is a bright shining light that reflects on Travolta's face. He seems dazed and takes a second to answer Jackson's question. When jackson and Travolta shoot one of the guys, the same light comes out of his body and reflects on them. Next scene, we see Marcellus talking to Willis and his head has a small bandage on it. Is there a conection? I think that there is. Terentino is such an intellegent man, he would have not done these small things without a reason. The shining light represents the soul. In the briefcase was Marcellus' soul that the guys had some how got possession of. Travolta and Jackson's job was to retrieve his soul. Now, we know that there is some reason for these small things Terentino added to the film. I would like to hear what others have to think about this. If you haven't noticed, check it out and write me back. All emails are welcome! Hope to hear from you.
Rating:
Summary: Quentin's the best
Review: Although this is his best flick, I also suggest that you check out Jackie Brown & From Dusk Till Dawn.
Rating: 
Summary: "Overrated" gets a significant meaning!
Review: I suppose I should apologise to the vast majority for what is about to follow (though I have no regrets) as my viewpoint on this movie is generally scorned. I give it one star for Samuel L. Jacksons amusing performance, another for being audacious. Not good, however, merely audacious. There have only been two occasions where I have felt like walking out during a cinema presentation, the latter being due to "Saving Private Ryan" making me feel nauseous at one point(though this is a compliment to realism, in what was a very good movie), the other through a distinct problem in staying awake during this movie (and no I was not excessively tired). I have seen hundreds of movies and am not averse to flashbacks in the least, but this was just preposterous. Ok some films start at the end then the remainder is flashback, so if the lead character dies at the start you accept the film will then build up to this point to explain the hows and whys. Pulp Fiction niether starts nor finishes with the lead character, but introduces him a short way in, flashes back, forward and sideways, kills him off in the MIDDLE, then expects you to retain interest in him with further flashbacks in the second half. On top of this, the Bruce Willis character is introduced late, and proceeds to send you into a soporific state of boredom. Whilst I concede he does also appear in the films one compelling scene, I cannot see how his performance was so highly rated. Personally I feel a lot of hype was built around the injection through the heart scene, although the build up to this, with Travolta and Thurman in a club, had virtually sent me to sleep anyway, and why people consider this whole portion to be cinematically magnificent is quite beyond me. Jackie Brown was simply stunning, this was simply nothing (apart from irritating).
Rating:
Summary: Don't knock it because you don't understand it.
Review: Say what you want about the content of the movie. Everyone has their own opinion on that, but don't criticize the movie because it jumped around and you were too slow to keep up. Samuel L. Jackson deserved to be nominated for Best Supporting Actor.
Rating:
Summary: The best movie done the latest years!
Review: I think that this movie is great. The screenplay is so well written that the whole movie is very beliveable. The Mcdonald's discussion in the beginning is already a classic. In other movies assasins just walking to their goals and says "Kill, Crush, Destroy" like they were robots or something. It is also very cool that every scene is so mixed that it ends in the same scene as the beginning. I van't understand that anybody could think that was bad. Everybody that think this movie is bad should just move out from the civilisation and collect shells or something
Rating: 
Summary: a bit over-rated
Review: I must admit this movie has tons of style. It has absolutely no substance, however. If that is what you are looking for in a movie, then by all means see this one.
|
