Rating: 
Summary: A Fear-ful Chiller, But is it Clancy?
Review: (this is a corrected version of a review I posted)
The Sum of All Fears, the fourth entry in the Jack Ryan film series, may be perhaps the hardest to assess objectively.Viewed purely as a stand-alone action thriller, Sum of All Fears is an above average effort, ranking just below Executive Decision and way above Under Siege 2. In spite of a tight budget, Phil Alden Robinson (Field of Dreams, Hackers) delivers a post-September 11 cautionary note about terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, and the acting by Ben Affleck, James Cromwell, Morgan Freeman, L. Schreiber, and the others in this ensemble cast is top-notch. While certainly not flawless, Paul Attanasio and Daniel Pyne's screenplay doesn't try to insult the audience's intelligence by going the James Bond route and having the hero stop the detonation of the bomb and catching the bad guys on his own. And one has to admire the production staff and cinematographer for maintaining the illusion that this movie does indeed span three continents when it was actually shot mostly in Canada (with the California desert briefly but convincingly doubling for the Middle East). Viewed as a Tom Clancy adaptation, however, one is left to wonder why Mace Neufeld - the producer who bought the film rights to Clancy's fiction - couldn't have made this film earlier while Harrison Ford was still interested in the Ryan role. As I have said in earlier reviews of these Clancy-based movies, screenwriters have an almost impossible labor when they adapt a thick Clancy novel into a 120 page screenplay. What makes Clancy's novels compelling to his fans - the large storyline with subplots and secondary characters that are developed further in other novels - doesn't always translate well to the silver screen. This is true of every Clancy novel-turned-into-film, but the novel that has been altered the most has been Sum of All Fears, and the changes are pretty radical. As most of Clancy's readers are aware, the novels' progression has mostly been centered on Ryan's rise from CIA analyst to (albeit accidentally) President of the United States. The Sum of All Fears (the book) is the mid-journey transition, where the events at the end will lead to the searing climax of Debt of Honor. By taking Jack Ryan back in time to the start of his CIA career (and by pretending the other movies don't exist), Neufeld, Attanasio, Pyne, Robinson (and to some degree Clancy himself, since he has an executive producing credit here) have made a hash of this idea. To what extent Harrison Ford's loss of interest in the Ryan role was involved I can't say. I am merely a movie watcher and not an insider (otherwise my reviews would be in the papers and not here gratis), but although Affleck is acceptable as a replacement, Ford's reliability, maturity, and steadiness are sorely missed. Not only that, but by setting the story in 2002 (albeit in a Tom Clancy parallel universe where George W. Bush has been replaced by Robert Fowler), gone is the near-end-of-the-Cold-War urgency that made the novel so suspenseful. (In one of those bizarre coincidences or flukes of history, the hardcover was released a few days before the failed coup against Gorbachev back in August of 1991!) Not only that, but the novel's cast of villains (an ex-East German terrorist, an ex-Stasi officer, an insane Native American criminal, several radical Palestinians, and a secret supporter) has been replaced by, Ach du lieber Gott, a group of neo-Nazis! Yes, Alan Bates makes a dapper and almost charming Nazi...in a sense he fares better here than Gregory Peck's hammy performance as Josef Mengele in The Boys from Brazil. But although I could buy the premise of Black Sunday with Nukes in the novel and could see the blind spot of the villains' plan (okay, the nuke explodes and the USA and USSR wipe each other off the map...and radiation and fallout ruin the northern hemisphere), but in the novel the characters are so bent on revenge (one is dying of cancer anyway, so he doesn't care about the aftermath) that the fatal flaw of their plan is not evident. Bates' Dressler, however, surely knows - as do his other apparently rich, educated, and old colleagues - that a nuclear exchange between America and Russia will also harm the Europe he is supposedly doing this insanity for. Anderson says (in the making-of featurette) that the change of villains was forced on the writers by the lack of plausibility of the book's weird mix of German, Native American, and Palestinian conspirators. I think Paramount and Neufeld simply feared criticism from Arab-Americans here and international audiences abroad, particularly in the wake of 9/11. Other oddities in the film involve the military details. How does that Russian Backfire bomber squadron find that American carrier on its own? Why is the carrier shown to be almost defenseless? In the real world, that carrier (USS Theodore Roosevelt, from her CVN 74 pennant number) would have had an F-14 combat air patrol up, as well as a ring of escorting cruisers and destroyers. How do the Russians know that B-2A Spirits have taken off from Aviano AB in Italy (they would have been based in Whiteman AFB in Missouri, but never mind)? And just what kind of radar do the Russians have that can spot a B-2 anyway? Still, the movie does work, quirkily. It has some really good bits, particularly the scenes with its two leading actors, Affleck and Freeman. Scheiber is actually a more interesting John Clark than the somewhat villainous looking Willem Dafoe (who played Clark in Clear and Present Danger). James Cromwell, too, fares well as the frazzled President who, when push comes to shove, almost cracks under the strain of the crisis that the Neo-Nazis have unleashed.
Rating: 
Summary: Hollywood is a criminal
Review: This movie does not even deserve 1 star. This movie is long, boring and predictable AND unbelievable. It was such a waste of my time to try and sit through this unproductive mess. Ironically this film is a classic reason to support and venture to see more independent films that are actually worth watching and paying for. Have you ever walked out of a movie theatre because the movie was so bad? Well be prepared to stop, rewind and move away from the tv. Please don't waste your time.
Rating: 
Summary: The botched up sum of all fears
Review: I read my first Tom Clancy book 13 years ago and wait every two years for his new book to come out. I decided to rent The Sum of All Fears. The facts for the most part were correct. The movie did not follow the book very well. The movie would be 10 hours long if it was told correctly. I think Tom Clancy did not have very much creative input into this movie because an f-16 cannot drop a gbu paveway smart bomb. I thought that in general Ben Affleck is a great Jack Ryan, But again in all the movies his wife has blonde hair and it is short.. And in the book they were working on their third child. I think it was a great movie but as the story goes (with the exception of jaws) the book was better than the movie
Rating: 
Summary: Coming from someone who never read the book
Review: This was one of my all-time favorite movies. Affleck did a good job, Freeman a great job, and the movie was very well-paced. What I liked the most about it were the action sequences, ie. the NAOC plane during snap-count, the stealth bombers taking off, and the scene when the song "Nessun Dorma" is playing. An altogether great movie, but based on the other reviews, you'll probably want to read the book second.
Rating:
Summary: a joke, right?
Review: this is well timed propaganda, and it is also very below the previous standards set by 'jack ryan' movies. BE AFRAID. someone's gonna blow you up. and only a pretty boy running around trying to get his cell phone working can save you! ooh, really tense.
Rating:
Summary: The Sum of All Fears
Review: This is a awsome action movie, as long as you don't conseder it part of the Tom Clancy Series (Clear and Presant Danger, Patriot Games, and Hunt For The Red October). Keep in mind most novel baced movies rarely follow the novel very closely. This was a pretty good action.
Rating:
Summary: Not bad if you've never seen a Jack Ryan Movie ...
Review: If you HAD however, this movie should, by all rights drive you crazy. Let me start by saying that if you're new to the Jack Ryan character and have never seen 'Patriot Games' or 'Clear and Present Danger' or 'The Hunt for Red October', then You'll probably really like this movie. The preformances are all solid, the characters are intresting, the plot moves well, and the action scenes are a lot of fun. If you HAD seen any of these movies though, you'll notice that the time-line for the four movies is REALLY messed up. This is supposed to be the FIRST Jack Ryan movie, it's pointed out that he just started in the CIA. Why then is this movie CLEARLY set in 2002? Shouldn't it have been set back in the early to mid eighties? I was floored that NOBODY making the movie seened to catch this REALLY OBVIOUS flaw in their characters story bible. It drove me crazy through the whole movie. So again, if you've never seen a Tom Clancy movie, you'll probably enjoy this movie a great deal. If you had , however, you'll probably be a little on the disappointed side.
Rating:
Summary: Reasonable Movie Nothing Like the Book
Review: An OK movie. It has almost no relationship to Clancy's book, but if you haven't read it, then the movie is tolerable stand-alone. Of course, you'd be much better off just reading Clancy's novel instead of watching the movie.
Rating:
Summary: GOOD STORY, AND GREAT MOVIE......
Review: I REALLY LIKED THIS MOVIE. IT IS KINDA HARD SEEING RYAN BEING PLAYED BY BEN AFFLECK AND NOT BY HARRISON FORD, BUT ONE GETS OVER IT QUICKLY. I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS ADDED TO THE TOM CLANCY MOVIES MADE TO DATE.....
Rating:
Summary: LOTS of fun, and NOTHING like the book!
Review: I just discovered Tom Clancy recently (right after his book "Red Rabbit" came out), and this was the first of the movies I've seen about Jack Ryan. It is very good, but I would like to encourage you to read the book as well, as it takes place at a very different time in Ryan's life and has much more suspense than the movie. You know the good guys will come out OK in the end - this is Hollywood/a novel - but in the book you get more storylines and more satisfaction at the end.
|
