Rating: 
Summary: A Superb Translation Of Tolkien's Masterpiece!
Review: Most simply put, this is masterpiece, a film that graphically epitomizes what an unbounded treasure an artistically derived adaptation of a simply wondrous novel (split into three segments because of size) can really be. Given the fact that Tolkien was himself a genius, a noted Don of Literature at Oxford , and a lifelong friend of famed novelist CS Lewis, it is no wonder that much of contemporary science fiction genre and the fantasy genre are all largely derivitive of his thought and work (especially contemporary efforts such as the Harry Potter series). Which is not to say that none of it is any good, but to point out the singular genius and imagination that this work represented when orifginally published as literature in the 1960s.Given all that, it was hard to be very optimistic in terms of one's expectations for the series, having already suffered through an animated attempt to portray portions of the legends associated with his work long ago. Yet, to my utter amazement, this really is a very faithful and imaginative recreation of all that one finds in the books, yet done in a way that in some way even exceeds the power ofthe novels. Thus, I heartily agree with the opinion of earlier reviewers who laud this film on the basis of its being a "fantasy adventure and also as an adaptation of a beloved literary classic". On this basis, then "The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring" stands alone as a worthy example of what kind of cinematic possibilities can be attained with enough vision, imagination, and, of course, money. For the cost of bringing this adaptation to film was astounding. Yet, everything associated with the film is consistent with Tolkien's somber vision of a world bent on a long-term devolution from magic and possibility to the crushing weight of politics and power. Indeed, the surreal mood set in the film catches Tolkien's dark vision exactly as one would envision it in one's head, and to this end the set and the special effets are of enormous benefit. So too, the casting lends itself to the mix of whimsey and amazement that the story weaves through its chapters, and the levels of dark of forces that gather round the not-so-merry band or fellowship signal the way the world is going, at least according to Tolkien. Of course, the cast of characters are really the key to the tale, and Director jackson has a terrific feel for this element as he weaves the characters through the tale. They, of course, represent the contradictions and the struggle of good with evil that we each hold within ourselves, and it is this struggle set in mythical times that is the key to the success of the venture. But stay tuned, for much more is to come! A simply astounding movie, and one that should need no recommendation. Enjoy!
Rating: 
Summary: I liked it, but...
Review: I've seen the Fellowship of the Rings twice, and I liked it a lot. I've read the books many times, and I'm thinking about buying the DVD. In my opinion, the movie stayed pretty true to the book, and I appreciated that a lot, but I have a few problems with it anyway. First of all, it left out one of my favorite characters: Tom Bombadil! I was disappointed about that. Also, I think that maybe the two actors who played Aragorn and Boromir should have been switched. The only other problem is, when you watch the movie after reading the book, you lose the sense of how much time it took for everything to happen. I know that probably couldn't be changed that much, and it was a three-hour movie anyway, but take the Mines of Moria, for example. It took the group at least a few days to get through them, and it seems much shorter than that in the movie. In spite of all that, it was better than I expected, and I did like the way they did Gollum. I thought Gollum was perfect, and so was Gandalf. Gandalf was almost exactly the way I had imagined him. I enjoyed it a lot, and I strongly reccomend it to anyone who likes fantasy.
Rating: 
Summary: Not Better than Harry Potter but still worth a look
Review: This is a pretty good movie although I felt Elijah Wood was not the best actor for the role. At times the movie was a bit slow moving. I plan to buy it for my collection but I still think that Harry Potter was a MUCH, MUCH better film.
Rating:
Summary: Look deeper!
Review: I definently have to say (actually I have about 1 trillion times) that this is the BEST movie that has been made...so far. I admire Mr. Jackson for laying down Tolkien's ideas plain and simple, I just finished reading FOTR again, and this movie is incredibly accurate with the book. But I'd like to set the pace for you people who don't understand the books or the movie (despite the excellent screenplay) look deeper into the characters, the story, the settings. Especially Sauron and the ring. Tolkien establishes the fact that there is evil in the world and it is very elusive. Most commonly it doesn't like to be called what it is. Sauron is the personification of Pride, that feeling inside all of us that exaggerates our own self-esteem, making us think we're something we're not. Just think of Boromir, how once the thought of the ring in his possession entered his thoughts, he was quickly overtaken with pride of Gondor's armies and powers and easily underestimated Sauron. In his mind he became Bormir the great: the wise king of Gondor. Just a thought for you fantasy-lovers out there: Look deeper into what Tolkien was saying, he was very wise in his time.
Rating:
Summary: Mastering the Masterpeice
Review: What can I say... The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is the most extraordionary and most astounding film ever created. Far better than Oscar Winner A Beautiful Mind. This film should have won all of it's nominations. This DVD will be the prized possesion of my DVD collection. I cannot wait till the second film will come out and also the Special Extended Edition of the movie. The score by Howard Shore is one of the best I've ever heard. Better than some of my favorite composer John Williams, has made. This is a masterpeice that you will want to experience over and over again.
Rating:
Summary: BEST MOVIE EVER!!!
Review: We cant wait for the two towers but we will have this glorious dvd soon in our hands. I cant believe it !!!
NOW WE WILL HAVE THE REAL MAGIC IN OUR HOMES!!!
NAMARIE!!!
Rating:
Summary: Just the Beginning.
Review: The movie 'The Fellowship of the Ring' has captured the beauty and essance of Tolkien's famed first book of the Lord of the Rings series. It's attention to detail and awesome cinemagraphic affects bring to life what us readers only used to dream about. But even though no movie ever created could possibly come close to being comparable to the magic of the books, this production is the closest thing. Those of us who are Tolkien fanatics, or just interested in owning an amazing movie will surely want to have this DVD. And for me, the day to its release is always too far away. Long live the Lord of the Rings, be it either in the minds of men, elves, dwarves, hobbits, or ents.
Rating:
Summary: Very Good Start At Cinematizing a Literary Saga
Review: The Story: Frodo Baggins is a hobbit (sort of like a leprechaun, but not) who inherits everything from his cousin, Bilbo, including a ring that turns out to be The One Ring of Power, forged by the evil Lord Sauron. Sauron has been defeated, but is rising again, and needs his Ring to coalesce and consolidate his power. The Ring grants its wearer long life, invisibility, and the ability to see evil, but it also corrupts the wearer and eventually causes the wearer to become a slave to Sauron. Sauron sends forth nine Black Riders (the Nazgul), who were once human kings but have been thoroughly corrupted, to find and retrieve the Ring. Frodo and eight companions set off to destroy the Ring by casting it into Mount Doom, a volcano in the middle of Sauron's kingdom. These nine are "The Fellowship of the Ring". They journey eastward, face many perils, and not all make it. I'll say no more. Location/Sets: New Zealand was the perfect location for this film; not only are the landscapes breathtaking, but they fit the epic feel of the story. The computer-generated sets, like Rivendell, Moria, and Lothlorien, are grand and perfect. The Acting: Elijah Wood wanted this part, got it, and did it well. Ian McKellen is perfect as Gandalf. Liv Tyler is perfect as the ethereal half-Elven princess Arwen. Hugo Weaving seems too sinister as Elrond. John Rhys-Davies is perfect as Gimli, as are Orlando Bloom as Legolas, Sean Bean as Boromir, and Sean Astin as Sam. Billy Boyd and Domenic Monaghan as Pippin and Merry seemed too hyperactive and silly. Viggo Mortenson did very well as Strider/Aragorn. I'll mention Christopher Lee as Saruman below. The Action: The fight scenes are dizzyingly fast, the balrog is magnificent, and the Orcs are disgusting, nasty, ominous, and vicious (very Orcish). Watch Legolas and his bow: they stand out in most fight scenes. Fidelity to the Book: For the most part, the film remains pretty faithful to Tolkien's writing. There are several deviations though. Arwen Undomiel's role is beefed up considerably, which I see as an improvement on Tolkien (even he had his flaws). Arwen's brother doesn't exist in the film, and Arwen gets credit for the flood that washed away the Nazgul, instead of Gandalf. Another change was not good, though: Saruman's character (played well by Christopher Lee) is re-written. In the book, Saruman's treachery is long in unfolding, and he does not want to work for Sauron, but harbors the illusion of using the Ring to supplant Sauron. In the film, the treachery is dumped into the viewer's lap, and Saruman sees himself as a vassal to Sauron. The third change, the deletion of the journey through the woods and the encounter with Tom Bombadil, is a loss, but an acceptable one. Better for Newcomers or Tolkien Fans? That's a question raised by many. I've read the books four times, including reading them this Fall in anticipation of the film. Maybe that's why the condensed and somewhat rewritten script bothers me as much as it does. However, I saw the film with my father, who has not read the books, and I know that some things were Greek (or Elvish) to him, like the dislike/distrust between Elves and Dwarves, the reason for Gimli's extreme sorrow over finding Moria overtaken by Orcs, and the implications for the Elves of the destruction of the One Ring. Overall: Not a bad effort. As with Dune, I believe the story would fit better into a ten-part mini-series, or even turn it into an outright series; however, the money for location/sets would not be there, and lesser actors might end up in pivotal roles.
Rating:
Summary: A Completely Amazing film!
Review: This film was under creation for quite some time. I remember back in '99 when there were rumors of the film being made. Well, it finally has been made. Put together an incredible story based on one of the best and most cherished books of all time, add strong actors, and amazing special effects and you'll get The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring. The story follows Frodo Baggins on his journey to destroy the One Ring that could result in the destruction of his world, Middle-Earth. This film was far beyond my expectations. I had read the Hobbit and was in the middle of the first Lord of the Rings book when I saw this film. I was truly amazed! This is THE BEST film of the new millenium thus far. The acting was so real...all the emotions: the pain, the fear, the sorrow...were brought to life by the most amazing actors. Peter Jackson is the best director of all time in my book. He has brought to life possibly the best book of all time and achieved complete perfection. I can not wait for The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers to come into the theaters this Christmas. This is one film that will not leave anyone dissapointed
Rating:
Summary: Tolkien's mind
Review: of cource this world that tolkien created in about 12 years is very extraordinary but it also is very true if you look at it in a historical way, the movie though is a totally different world with the same charecters and the story itself, but it is a completely different thing and if you start compering the book and the movie you will see thwt eather the book is wrong or the movie because all people think different things. never compare the two, they are both extremely good and that is why the product should have the rating of five. and also not many people have wide screen tv's and full screen is better in many ways because of that.
|
