Heroes Shed No Tears

Rating:
Summary: Goodbye, Chinaman
Review: It's Woo's Showgirls, or Hook-take your pick. It's hard to believe he made A Better Tomorrow next. It's even harder to believe he did better work with the likes of Dolph Lundgren. There are hints of things to come, and some pretty good hand-to-hand near the end, but that's the only thing good about it. Well, that and it's mercifully short running time.

Rating:
Summary: Goodbye, Chinaman
Review: It's Woo's Showgirls, or Hook-take your pick. It's hard to believe he made A Better Tomorrow next. It's even harder to believe he did better work with the likes of Dolph Lundgren. There are hints of things to come, and some pretty good hand-to-hand near the end, but that's the only thing good about it. Well, that and it's mercifully short running time.

Rating:
Summary: Disappointed
Review: Just as w/ Hong Kong Face-Off (also by John Woo), I found Heroes Shed No Tears to be one of John Woo's weaker movies. The melodrama was tacky, the characters weakly developed, and the storyline lacking any logical sequence. Missing is that smashing cinematography that we see in later films like Face-Off or Hard Boiled, or the strong character development seen in Face-Off, Hard Boiled or The Killer. If you're merely browsing for a good HongKong action flick, skip this baby. If you're interested in seeing how John Woo's cinematographic genius developed and how he came to be where he is today, go to your local Asian video store and rent this movie. If you're die hard John Woo and wanna just buy anything by him, beware...this film isn't what you'd expect it to be.

Rating:
Summary: Foreshadowing of FUTURE WOO (but not quite there!).
Review: This is obviously a rather early John Woo film, made right before A Better Tomorrow, which was his breakthrough epic. Watching it, I felt like it was a foreshadowing of Bullet in the Head (my personal favorite John Woo flick), but not as refined. It has some great action scenes, such as the Sniper Shot scene (mentioned by another reviewer as well) and the swamp fight against the natives. The massive, unrelenting action scenes will leave you at the edge of your seat: but there's still a problem. Being that it is an earlier Woo flick, it isn't (as I've said) as refined as A Better Tomorrow or Hard-Boiled. Also, it DOES lack Chow Yun Fat. The cohesiveness of the plot/ action/ story/ characters/ etc that is found in his later films is missing in this. Often I was left thinking, "Dood. This doesn't make sense." And thrown in is a scene where basically girls get naked: A VERY Un-Woo scene. I was both shocked and dissapointed to see this scene, but again, it is an earlier film so it shall be excused.

If you liked Bullet in the Head, this will dissapoint you, but I think it's still something to watch if you can call yourself a Woo fan. But if you're not really into the Woo style of things, go rent Full Metal Jacket or something instead.

Rating:
Summary: Whether you like John Woo or not, this one's in the gutter.
Review: This was a truly awful effort, one which should be viewed only as an indicator of how lost John Woo became before he focused his genius on A Better Tomorrow and, even more so, The Killer.

Eddie Ko Hung is terrible in the lead role as a soldier of fortune with a soft spot, all the female actors are atrocious in poorly written roles, the action sequences are mundane and lacking in grace (thanks to a cast of workhorse, completely charmless actors), the violence laughable, the villains completely one-sided, and the cinematography a step back to the horrific '70s.

The worst component of this sick excuse for a film is the child actor known on set only as "Friday", according to accounts by a co-producer of the film. Hong Kong has never been known for naturalistic actors or for paying great attention to subtlety of presentation, but this kid deserves a nomination for worst performance of all time. Perhaps they overdubbed his dialogue, for every line he speaks sounds like a 16-year-old voice actor (or a woman -- as they do in cartoons in Hong Kong) trying to emulate a six-year-old child. His face is a hysterical exaggeration, like a theatrical mask, and his aim-for-the-cutesy posing becomes excessively annoying after a while. I found myself cheering when he's trapped in the flames, groaning when he escapes death, and smirking when he loses his mother. Talk about losing an audience member. This film is the first John Woo work I've seen (and I'd seen all of his mostly brilliant post-1986 work, even Blackjack, before hitting upon this pile of trash) to make me cynical to such a degree.

Thank God John Woo has progressed past this. For if he had remained this kind of a filmmaker producing this kind of junk, he's the one who should have his eyes sewn shut.

Rating:
Summary: It's just as good as Woo's films, better than most of them
Review: Unbelievable! This film was real nice. I got it just cuz it looked entertaining, maybe it would make me laugh. It did more than that. the acting is superb and unbelievably powerful at times. I love this movie and will probably watch it several times a year for many years to come. Rent it if you can find it, but it's definitely worth buying if you can't

Rating:
Summary: It's just as good as Woo's films, better than most of them
Review: Unbelievable! This film was real nice. I got it just cuz it looked entertaining, maybe it would make me laugh. It did more than that. the acting is superb and unbelievably powerful at times. I love this movie and will probably watch it several times a year for many years to come. Rent it if you can find it, but it's definitely worth buying if you can't

Rating:
Summary: Early but good Film by Master John Woo
Review: When I first saw this film it was only because one of my fav. directors, John Y. Woo made it. But it is surprisingly good for an old lo-budget HongKong movie. The direction is all right and when the action turns on, you can see the master's handwriting. This film is gross but entertaining and it's worth a rental. Avoid the dubbed Version!

Rating:
Summary: Classic. . . but overdone
Review: When I first saw this film on television, I laughed my pants off. It's one of those movies that you've seen, time and time again, made fun of, due to its poorly timed dubbing and spiratic violence. The picture quality was horrible, which fit its cheap attitude perfectly, and more than three quarters of the movie was spent using extremely primitive sound-effects. Yet, despite these small glitches, the movie seemed to draw forth more of my attention than it deserved. I couldnt help but revel at how consistant John Woo was through his natorious use of explosions, stunts, and hardened drama. The movie didn't glorify violence, however, but made it almost humorously insignificant. The killing rate was undoubtedly outragous, where ten to twenty "bad guys" in a scene would fall to their death as the hero spray's unplotted bullets everywhere. The drama was very low, as well as unbelievable, and the relationship between characters was poorly stimulated. However, this is the beauty of John Woo's films (and action films in general). He expressed each character through pure violence and tension; nothing more. Most of the drama in the movie derived from such violent siduations, and this tactic proves very effective. Because of this, John Woo unfortunately delivered an excess amount of action; to the point of exaustion. This was the main setback, since it lowered the appreciation of John Woo's poetic action sequences greatly. The cinematography quality was on and off, sometimes exceptional and sometimes very very poor. The script was horrible, consisting of cheap one-liners and poorly thought-out reactions. Never the less, I loved this movie not for its basic script and storyline, but for the attitude that the action sets forth (especially the laughs). Call it cheap, call it trash, but any sane action-movie critic out there will call it classic. I would recommend seeing the movie before buying it, but I would definately recommend buying the movie just for the heck of it. Enjoy!

Rating:
Summary: Classic. . . but overdone
Review: When I first saw this film on television, I laughed my pants off. It's one of those movies that you've seen, time and time again, made fun of, due to its poorly timed dubbing and spiratic violence. The picture quality was horrible, which fit its cheap attitude perfectly, and more than three quarters of the movie was spent using extremely primitive sound-effects. Yet, despite these small glitches, the movie seemed to draw forth more of my attention than it deserved. I couldnt help but revel at how consistant John Woo was through his natorious use of explosions, stunts, and hardened drama. The movie didn't glorify violence, however, but made it almost humorously insignificant. The killing rate was undoubtedly outragous, where ten to twenty "bad guys" in a scene would fall to their death as the hero spray's unplotted bullets everywhere. The drama was very low, as well as unbelievable, and the relationship between characters was poorly stimulated. However, this is the beauty of John Woo's films (and action films in general). He expressed each character through pure violence and tension; nothing more. Most of the drama in the movie derived from such violent siduations, and this tactic proves very effective. Because of this, John Woo unfortunately delivered an excess amount of action; to the point of exaustion. This was the main setback, since it lowered the appreciation of John Woo's poetic action sequences greatly. The cinematography quality was on and off, sometimes exceptional and sometimes very very poor. The script was horrible, consisting of cheap one-liners and poorly thought-out reactions. Never the less, I loved this movie not for its basic script and storyline, but for the attitude that the action sets forth (especially the laughs). Call it cheap, call it trash, but any sane action-movie critic out there will call it classic. I would recommend seeing the movie before buying it, but I would definately recommend buying the movie just for the heck of it. Enjoy!