Armageddon

Rating:
Summary: Don't be ridiculous
Review: It was fun and you damn well know it. Fellow film buffs and critics, we all know anybody who said this is a great movie doesn't know the first thing about film, so don't write something negative in response. This movie didn't attempt to do any but entertain with humor and great special effects and it succeeded; why complain about it not having the elements of a serious film when it doesn't attempt to. You want a film to complain about for being pretentious and unrealistic, write a review of A Time To Kill.

Rating:
Summary: Garbage
Review: I think I may have laughed a couple of times between naps. Really really stupid.

Rating:
Summary: Good movie, great pic. on DVD
Review: Awesome picture quality and special effects, wish there was more effects w/sound. Great DVD for any collection though.

Rating:
Summary: Sensational
Review: I really enjoy watching this movie. it is very suspensful! I think it portrays the human emotions really well and the special effects were smashing. There was only one thing I found wrong; the times were not right. 45 seconds took a minute and a half. But in what movies do they ever have the time right? Ben Affleck, Bruce Willis, Liv Tyler, and Billy Bob Thorton all did excellent acting jobs. I would like to congratulate the directors and the casters, they did an EXCELLENT job. Keep the good work coming!!!!!

Rating:
Summary: 2 and a half stars, way over rated
Review: The plot was unrealistic and not well thought up. The plot was not really even there, the acting was terrible ( especially tylers daughter, join a band) it was funny and average at best. if you have a free year spend 2 and a half hours on this.

Rating:
Summary: It's only a movie.
Review: All you people that complain about movies need to remember that they are merely a form of entertainment. It's worthless to complain about how unrealistic a movie is when it is a work of fiction that is put together to give you something to do for 2 hours.

Rating:
Summary: Criterion collection? why?
Review: More proof that special effects cannot carry a movie alone. Why did Criterion decide to add this tired genre movie to it's collection? If you ever want to know whats wrong with big budget movies, this is a perfect example. Stereotypical charactrers, thin on plot, and a truck load of(welldone) special effects. Get 2001 instead.

Rating:
Summary: WEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!
Review: Wow! What a fun movie! When I first saw it, I honestly thought to myself, "This is the greatest movie of all time." But then i came to my senses and realized that it was just the way the movie got to you! It is very exciting from beginning to end. The coolest thing is that the camera just never seems to stop moving so your eyes are always going in a billion different directions at once! It sounds confusing, but it just adds to the fun factor. But, seriously, I honestly think that the best thing about this summer blockbuster is Trevor Rabin's musical score. It is the best I've ever heard in my entire life!!! The effects are AMAZING, the script is witty, the characters are colorful and the destruction is purely EXPLOSIVE!!! But who am I to say all these things? Everyone and their mother has seen this movie so why the heck am I typing this anyway? Oh, well... FUN FUN SILLY WILLY!!! BUY IT!!!

Rating:
Summary: GREAT MOVIE!!!!
Review: THIS WAS A VERY GOOD MOVIE!! IT WAS ALSO A TEAR-JERKER. GO OUT AND WATCH IT!!!

Rating:
Summary: Terrible
Review: I'd go into detail as to why I don't enjoy this movie, but most has already been said. Suffice to say that I now rate bad movies by how many time better than Armageddon they were - ex, Wind Commander got a 5 times better, etc.

One nice thing, though - Ben Affleck is at his hunkyest in this one ;)