Home :: DVD :: Action & Adventure :: General  

Animal Action
Blackmail, Murder & Mayhem
Blaxploitation
Classics
Comic Action
Crime
Cult Classics
Disaster Films
Espionage
Futuristic
General

Hong Kong Action
Jungle Action
Kids & Teens
Martial Arts
Military & War
Romantic Adventure
Science Fiction
Sea Adventure
Series & Sequels
Superheroes
Swashbucklers
Television
Thrillers
Gladiator (Single Disc Edition)

Gladiator (Single Disc Edition)

List Price: $19.99
Your Price: $15.99
Product Info Reviews

<< 1 .. 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 .. 148 >>

Rating: 1 stars
Summary: garbage
Review: this movie totally sucked --- someone else agreed on here so i`m not alone--the dialogue the plot everything is ridiculous but i agree too- all the hype had me expecting something great-- not one scene was any good and nothing that even approached that chariot scene from ben hur and that was made a million years ago --- nothing was convincing or beleivable or exciting or anything---hated it ! rip off !

Rating: 2 stars
Summary: Six Degrees of Historical Separation
Review: When I first saw the battle scene and heard the battle cry of the Germania barbarians, I had to replay that scene a couple of times to make sure of what I was hearing. I thought that somehow a soundtrack from another movie made in 1964 had been accidentally included with this film. The 1964 movie I'm referring to is called "Zulu" and is based on an actual battle in January of 1879 between British troops and Zulu warriors in South Africa.

So based upon this "historically inaccurate" event, what are we to deduce? That the Zulu nation of 1879 used the same war cry as the Germanic tribes of 180 A.D. because they were somehow descendents and migrated from North Central Europe to South Africa?

I wonder if the same people responsible for this gaffe had worked on "Zulu", if they would have had the Zulu warriors yelling "Banzai"?

"Gladiator" was OK. I probably had preferred that Commodius had been dispatched as he actually had been from the historical point of view, and that Maximus had escaped, been reunited with his army and returned to Rome to battle Quintus and then found out he had been cheated out of his revenge with Commodius.

Another point between "Zulu" and "Gladiator" - in 1964 there were no computer enhancements done for "Zulu". What you saw was real, not digitally done to show the overwhelming force of Zulu warriors. Also the battle scenes were more "stable"....shot in real time....not done in 3 different speeds then spinning from here to there and back again.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: ONE OF THE BEST MOVIES I'VE EVER SEEN
Review: Some people may say that the story for Gladiator is too formulatic, too predictable. You know why? Because they haven't seen the movie! Ridley Scott's interpretation of the gladiatorial struggle is beautifully and brutally depicted, making you gawk and gasp at the same time. Ridley Scott is a genius by my book, especially for creating one of the best movies of all time! And the pace! Even though the movie is 154 minutes long, it captivated me the whole time and still captivates me! Russell Crowe did an outstanding job as Maximus. There is no other who could have made me root for the hero more than him when he turns and confesses his identity to Commodus. And the scenery is wonderful! The drastic use of colors, from rich to drab to rich once more. The colors themselves explain the movie alone, as do all the other essential elements. That is the main reason why the movie is so good: equal spectacle. The number of different storylines in Gladiator could have been difficult to portray, and could really slow down the film. But, once again praise to Ridley Scott for making the storylines fit into the story and actually boost it. If it weren't for Braveheart, this would be the best movie I've ever seen. Even if you haven't seen it, BUY IT! THERE IS NO WAY YOU CANNOT ENJOY, LOVE, OR APPRECIATE GLADIATOR

Rating: 3 stars
Summary: Russell Crowe is Brilliant, but the movie is flat
Review: As much as I admire Russell Crowe's acting, I cannot and will not give this movie 5 stars. This cliche of filmmaking is flat and too shallow. I felt no emotions after seeing this film in the theaters. The story of a general becoming a slave and then regaining the rightful throne to the emperor of Rome. The problem is, he never makes it. He gets murdered by the evil Phoenix and hits on her sister. The best part of the film is the first 20min. very similar to the Omaha Beach landing in Saving Private Ryan.....

Rating: 3 stars
Summary: Good looking film but not much else.
Review: The premise for Galdiator was supposed to be based on the gladiator fights in the Coliseum. Having done a report on the Coliseum, I was very exited about this movie. But it is a major disappointment. The movie is 2 hours and 35 minutes long but there are 15 minutes of battles or less. Most of the movie is a bunch of dialogue and more than half of it has no significance to the story. The special effects are OK but not spectacular. Some of the more ambitious shots look about as realistic as a CG cinema from a video game. I don't see how a lot of citics think it's one of the best movies ever made. It's not a perfect film. I seem to be the only one who agrees with Ebert who gave this film 2 stars out of 4. The only Acadamy Awards I would give this film are Best Actor for Russel Crowe, Best Director(the screenplay is not Ridley Scott's fault), art direction, and costume design. Gladiator will definitely be nominated for Best Picture but I hope it doesn't win. If it does, you'll know why the Acadamy Awards building will be on fire the next day.

Rating: 3 stars
Summary: Gladitsover!
Review: This movie was a surprising disappointment. The acting was superb. Russell Crowe did a fabulous job portraying the main character, Maximus, and all the supporting actors were absolutely fabulous. The plot was somewhat captivating and easy to follow. However, it seemed to be on the same gore level as Braveheart (but, then again, what can you expect? Ancient Romans had a pretty sick sense of entertainment. I mean, who likes to watch people die gruesome deaths?). Though the actors and writers did an above average job, the directing could have been done better by a junior-high student. The camera was constantly switching positions, and except for a few longer speeches, mostly made by Maximus, the camera never stayed in the same position for more than five seconds. Secondly, throughout the movie, the director always goes to this overly-symbolic, confusing, unmentioned, unimportant scene with Maximus running his hand through a field (what is that supposed to signify?). Though this movie was fairly entertaining (mostly because of Russell Crowe), this is not an Oscar-calibar film.

Rating: 3 stars
Summary: It has its moments
Review: This film was mostly a disappointment after all the hype. The plot was weak as was the dialogue, but the effects were what one would expect of a Ridley Scott film. Only really worth watching for the fight scenes. I Claudius was infinitely more authentic and successful in capturing the true feeling of Anciant Rome, and it had no special effects at all. The end of this film was ridiculous. As if that weedy Commodus would get in the ring with Maximus. Also, could'nt they have come up with a more imaginative name - Maximus. It's a bit obvious is'nt it!

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: a Must see!
Review: At first when i saw this movie would be out, i got excited, and expected a whole lot from it, which tottaly destroys a movie, right? wrong. not this one. i expected a lot, and it surpassed my expectations! i was (and still am) into mideval times when i saw the film, and it just brought the fantisies of leading an army into war into life. It incorperated many fantasy aspects as well, and the part i like most about this movie is the ending isn't what you would expect. the special effects are great, the storyline flows well, acting is supurb, everything is just magnificent! if you havn't seen it, go see it now! you must see this epic film.

Rating: 1 stars
Summary: This movie bites, get X-MEN
Review: Honestly, it surpasses this flick by FAR.

Rating: 3 stars
Summary: Good movie, but the extras on DVD outshine the film
Review: Gladiator wants to be Ben-Hur, really. There's no denying that the costumes, sets, visual effects, and gore are spectacular, but that's where the glory ends. Russell Crowe is powerful and convincing in his role as Maximus, and Joaquin Phoenix is equally wonderful as the sniveling coward Commodus, but the talents of these men are nearly overshadowed by the film's incredible length.

Many of the scenes involve, of course, the gladiator contests, and it is in these that we see Maximus' power as both a survivor and superior fighter. But in all honesty, about an hour into the movie, you feel as though you've been watching it much longer. The film moves slowly and never seems to gain any real momentum. You can fall asleep at many points in the movie, wake up, and be completely caught up in a few minutes, as I did. The slaughter of Maximus' family doesn't quite pull at your heart like I think the director wanted it to. I found myself more annoyed that Maximus wouldn't assume the power that Marcus was bequeathing him.

That said, the extra DVD that accompanies the film is wonderful! There are interviews, behind-the-scenes trivia, and a section of clips that ended up on the cutting room floor. I really enjoyed watching the short segment on the costumes and special makeup required for the battle scenes. The extra DVD has all sorts of goodies that are a DVD-owners dream! If you're a big fan of the film and you own a DVD player, then this will be a great addition to your collection.

The film is certainly worth seeing at least once for all of the special effects and Russell Crowe's amazing acting skills!


<< 1 .. 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 .. 148 >>

© 2004, ReviewFocus or its affiliates