Rating: 
Summary: Best first person shooter
Review: This is the most intense game ive played since half-life. THe Graphics are bitchin and the A.I is incredible. Almost all the weapons are authentic from the time period. This game scared the hell out of me about a hundred times. This game is already good without the multiplayer. The multiplayer is incredible. Play as the allies or the Axis in the D-day confrontation on omaha beach.There are also many other multiplayer maps.
Rating:
Summary: THE WOLF IS BACK!!!!!
Review: After playing the first Wolfenstein which seems like eons ago, I was looking forward to an "updated" version. I think it was well worth the wait!!! Although the single player version of RTCW could use some improvement, the multiplayer more than makes up for it!!!
I would actually give it SIX stars!! ******
Rating: 
Summary: Can I have some ammo please?
Review: I quit playing this game early on when I got sick of never being able to find more than barely enough ammunition or health packs to make it through each encounter. This game goes way beyond the meaning of "challenge" and becomes literally impossible. I have played Deus Ex and Max Payne, so it's not like I have never played a challenging shooter before. Each opponent takes 20 bullets to kill, and some encounters are unwinnable if you have wasted a single bullet in the past half hour of the game. Stealth is nonexistent, so you can't sneak past anyone in a pinch.As for shooting Nazis, don't get too excited about that either. The creators of this game decided to let their creativity take a vacation, and instead decided to add a bunch of monsters and goblins and ghouls. Yay. Another monster shooter game. This game is garbage.
Rating: 
Summary: Not your father's Wolfenstein
Review: Pros: Stunning graphics; interesting single-player missions; fun multiplayer. Cons: Apparently only the Allies could afford lightbulbs; single-player lacks the cathartic "kill 'em all" flavor of the original; way too much sneaking around needed; "smart" enemies aren't; mouse-keyboard control system takes a lot of getting used to; maybe a little too realistic.
Rating:
Summary: It is fun and that is all that matters
Review: The fact that this game could have possibly been a mod, (and they are current mods/games that are similar) does not take anything away from this game. The single player is good fun, although short. The multiplayer is class base and is reminiscent of the TFC series, but the graphics and the theme is what is entertaining. The gameplay is smooth, and for the most part balanced, and it is clear when a official SDK comes out the mod and map potential for this game is almost limitless. Its ties to the original is loose, and even if it didn't have the name of Wolfenstein, it would still sell as it has. I can only say this, the game is fun and that is all that matters
Rating:
Summary: Only worth it for muliplayer
Review: The problem with this game is that they didn't know what game to make. One minute you are playing a WWII game, then it becomes Tomb Raider or Doom.
1st person shooters are in arut, they are getting worse and worse, this game is sooo boring and invoves practically no thought or problem solving. It's basically stay alive and kill everything.
Now the multiplayer is quite fab, and it makes me wonder if the made RTCW purposely different from the upcoming Medal of Honor, I dunno, but multiplayer is th eonly reason to get this game, I was very disappointed. Get Medal of Honor if you crave a good WWII game.
Rating: 
Summary: Great Idea - Poor Execution
Review: Maybe the game had too much hype, but after nearly completing the single player and playing the multi-player for several weeks, I am rather disappointed. The single player missions for the most part are boring and repetitive. I'm comparing it to Half-Life and it is nowhere even close to the quality of the single player. What is really shocking are the graphic defects present in the game - guns appearing through walls, dead soldiers hovering a few feet above ground, some cheesy AI, but better than most. The multiplayer is much more enjoyable, and uses many of the single player maps. I'll be selling it and buying Medal of Honor when it comes out.
Rating:
Summary: Excellent game. Outstanding Multi-Player game
Review: A total team based MP based game. Graphics are outstanding. Well worth the money.
Rating: 
Summary: Typical 3D Shooter
Review: Good game, nothing really ground breaking. Soldier of Fortune & Half-Life are better.
Rating:
Summary: Fascinating atmosphere in a surrealistic environment!
Review: This game has surprised me even with the already high expectations I had before seeing it. The story is a little bit obscure, yet the level-design and the 3D-engine is really great. What I liked most about this game is the atmosphere, which makes me duck when suddenly a foe appears even sitting only in front of the screen. Surely it's only enjoyable for machines with a good 3D-performance. It has the same engine as Quake3 Arena, but especially in open-air areas it takes more resources than Q3A. I recommend to use a 3D-Audio system like EAX with 4 speakers or even better a dolby-surround sound with this game.
| 
