Rating: 
Summary: More Monster hype
Review: "High velocity of propagation for lower time smear"What does this mean? The light from the source to the destination over this 1 meter cable probably takes 4 to 5 billionths of a second. I would like to know how this time affects anything sonically, as even golden ears who claim they can hear 100 kHz are talking about 10 millionths of a second cycle time. Light's light - buy the cheapest optical you can find. If it works, it will sound just as good as this overpriced stuff.
Rating: 
Summary: Fair enough
Review: Alot of people say that Monster Cable is overrated. True, they are expensive. I use Monster Cable accessories because I know what kind of improvements to expect from them. Often times, the people here who have issues with Monster Cable, or any sort of a/v cable for that matter, often times do not have high performance a/v equipment. While I'm far from one of those theaterphiles who get paid to test new equipment in specific soundrooms, I do know enough to be able to distinguish what I (emphasis on I) sounds/looks better for my specific needs. Bottom line, Monster cables are a step up from the cables you'll receive with your equipment and will be more distinguishable if you have the right components. I use these digital cables because I have surround sound speakers and a Samsung receiver. If you're someone who does not have or plan on using surround sound, then you probably don't want to shell out money for this digital cable.
Rating:
Summary: Fair enough
Review: Alot of people say that Monster Cable is overrated. True, they are expensive. I use Monster Cable accessories because I know what kind of improvements to expect from them. Often times, the people here who have issues with Monster Cable, or any sort of a/v cable for that matter, often times do not have high performance a/v equipment. While I'm far from one of those theaterphiles who get paid to test new equipment in specific soundrooms, I do know enough to be able to distinguish what I (emphasis on I) sounds/looks better for my specific needs. Bottom line, Monster cables are a step up from the cables you'll receive with your equipment and will be more distinguishable if you have the right components. I use these digital cables because I have surround sound speakers and a Samsung receiver. If you're someone who does not have or plan on using surround sound, then you probably don't want to shell out money for this digital cable.
Rating: 
Summary: simple physics
Review: I'm using Monster optical cable as well, but with different reasons behind. Anybody with a basic knowledge of physics or optics should know that under normal condition light is not susceptible to interference from magnetic field or EMF.
Rating: 
Summary: Great sound and it eliminated a video ghosting problem!
Review: If you are looking for the utmost in sound quality from your digital source a coaxial type cable is the BETTER choice, but if your limited to a toslink type connection this is sound choice (no pun intended) and a good buy! Unfortunately my RCA DSS system only has a toslink digital connection and after initial installation I ran out and purchased a no name optical cable. As soon as I connected the cable I began to test the entire system to make sure that nothing was accidentally disconnected when I added the DSS system. During testing, I noticed a video-ghosting problem when viewing a tape on my VCR. I narrowed it down to the VCR and DSS system, as the problem only appeared when they were both on at the same time. After various tests I narrowed it down to the no name brand optical cable as the problem totally disappeared when I took that cable out of the system. So I began to troubleshoot the issue, but no matter what I tried... different cable paths, making sure that a digital cable did not cross a video cable, different power outlets for the two video sources... I just couldn't banish the ghost. Then an idea hit me... cable manufactures insist that shielding is the key to a good cable, so why is an optical cable any different? My hunt for a good quality and shielded optical cable ended when I found the Monster Cable Interlink LightSpeed 100. It has everything that a good cable needs... quality and easy to use connectors, shielding and flexibility. So I purchased the cable and once connected in my system I was pleased to find out that I no longer had any video ghosting issues. How did it sound compared to the no name brand cable? Well, with my limited testing I can state that it had better controlled and defined bass and possibly better high-end definition. I say possibly as I cut the listening session short as I was elated that I finally exercised my system of that annoying ghost. One last note.... please remember not to bend an optical cable sharply as you may damage the delicate inner optical fiber of the cable itself... rendering the cable useless.
Rating:
Summary: Optical is the way to go
Review: If you haven't spent a decent amount of money on your sound system, don't buy optical cable. I hear many people complain about how they can't tell the difference between RCA and optical, but when I see what they're using for a receiver and speakers, the problem is obvious. You're stereo system is only as good as its weakest link, and optical cable is intended for high-end stereo equipment. It's that simple. If you're balking at the price you're spending on optical cable, you probably haven't invested enough money into your stereo equipment for it to really make a difference.
That said, if you do decide to go optical, Monster is an easy choice. Although I'm sure they hike up the price a bit on name alone, they do make some of the best audio cable out there, optical or otherwise. I've noticed marked improvement in the sound quality from both my DVD and even MP3 player. If you want to take a chance with a less known brand for a cheaper price, good luck, but I'm willing to spend a little more for quality.
Rating:
Summary: Optical is the way to go
Review: If you haven't spent a decent amount of money on your sound system, don't buy optical cable. I hear many people complain about how they can't tell the difference between RCA and optical, but when I see what they're using for a receiver and speakers, the problem is obvious. You're stereo system is only as good as its weakest link, and optical cable is intended for high-end stereo equipment. It's that simple. If you're balking at the price you're spending on optical cable, you probably haven't invested enough money into your stereo equipment for it to really make a difference.
That said, if you do decide to go optical, Monster is an easy choice. Although I'm sure they hike up the price a bit on name alone, they do make some of the best audio cable out there, optical or otherwise. I've noticed marked improvement in the sound quality from both my DVD and even MP3 player. If you want to take a chance with a less known brand for a cheaper price, good luck, but I'm willing to spend a little more for quality.
Rating:
Summary: Optical is optical
Review: Monster could sell ice to Eskimos I do agree that cables make a difference when electronis devices are involved, however a fibre optic cable will not make one iota of difference to the sound quality when compared to another - no questions, full stop. An illustration of how some people will buy anything is the crazy guy who said his picture improved! Enough said
Rating:
Summary: simple physics
Review: The cable itself if phenominal. When I bought my first DVD player I bought along with it Monster S and Optical cables, and I haven't looked back since. *But, for the most part, this review is just to state that an earlier review from "Jakob from England" should be disregarded due to his obvious lack of knowledge of the product. I mean, what exactly was he "watching" with this optical cable?
Rating:
Summary: Jakob from England doesn't know much......
Review: The cable itself if phenominal. When I bought my first DVD player I bought along with it Monster S and Optical cables, and I haven't looked back since. *But, for the most part, this review is just to state that an earlier review from "Jakob from England" should be disregarded due to his obvious lack of knowledge of the product. I mean, what exactly was he "watching" with this optical cable?
| 
