<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: Better than Quark
Review: I've been in design and publishing for six years. I've had to use Quark because Macromedia never made anything better, Pagemaker was a joke, and Illustrator didn't do multiple pages. Quark is quirky. The best thing about InDesign is that if you use Illustrator it's very easy to pick up. It's a little pricey, but if you're doing high end publishing it's a must. I've gotten away with doing this type of work in Freehand, which let's you do multiple pages, but the press sheets are better here.The original version had a lot of quirks, but 1.5 is better.
Rating:
Summary: Better than Quark
Review: I've been in design and publishing for six years. I've had to use Quark because Macromedia never made anything better, Pagemaker was a joke, and Illustrator didn't do multiple pages. Quark is quirky. The best thing about InDesign is that if you use Illustrator it's very easy to pick up. It's a little pricey, but if you're doing high end publishing it's a must. I've gotten away with doing this type of work in Freehand, which let's you do multiple pages, but the press sheets are better here. The original version had a lot of quirks, but 1.5 is better.
<< 1 >>
| 
