Rating: Summary: The worst book Steel has ever written!!!! Review: I can't believe how terrible this whole story was. It was truly horrible. Did she really have to keep mentioning that Paul kept having his head taken off. A very silly plot!!! I am very disappointed with an author who usually writes interesting stories where I can't put the book down. I am embarrassed that I finished this one.
Rating: Summary: Un-Danielle-Steel like, but good Review: I know all you Danielle Steel fans hated this book. That made all your comments totally biased for general public. If you only like Danielle Steel style book(whatever that means), then read the other reviews. As far as I'm concerned, this book retains the same style she always had. She added a major twist to her own writing by behaving like the characters in the book. I liked it. It might not be what you expected of her, but it was a good story. It wasn't a 5 star review because she didn't go into enough details on the twisted "experiment". But, again, that's not her strong suite and she never did that before. It was a good story. That fact that it doesn't fit some typical Danielle Steel fan's taste doesn't mean it's a horrible book.
Rating: Summary: Don't waste your money-------totally stupid Review: There are no redeeming qualities in this book-----and there is absolutely no romance.
Rating: Summary: This can't be a Danielle Steel book!! Review: I am an avid Danielle Steel reader, but this book was very disappointing. After reading the negative reviews, I purchased it anyway. It was not good reading even from the beginning; however I waded through it. I hope her next books are better than this one, or I will be an ex-Danielle Steel fan. I cannot believe she wrote such meaningless trash!!
Rating: Summary: A Great Intro To Danielle Steel Review: Having never read Steel I was pleasantly surprised.This was cuteand entertaining, a light read. Her sense of humor glides you throughthe pages.
Rating: Summary: Shocking type of book for Danielle Steele Review: I have read each and every book that Danielle Steele has written and have enjoyed each and everyone of them until......The Klone & I. What was she thinking to write such a horrible book - it was absolutely dreadful. I wish I could return this book and I thank heavens that I bought it in paperback instead of my usual hard cover. This book is now filed under "G" and I wouldn't even consider passing it on. Lori - Toronto, Canada
Rating: Summary: Pathetic waste of paper Review: What was Danielle Steel thinking (or smoking) when she wrote this book? Her books are usually quite good, but this one is far from it. The concept of a "klone" in a romance novel is intriguing --- What possibilities it could have! (Too bad Ms. Steel couldn't think of any.) The writing was poor and the attempts at comedy lame beyond belief. Thank goodness I rented the book from the library and didn't waste my money.
Rating: Summary: Pathetic waste of paper Review: What was Danielle Steele thinking (or smoking) when she wrote this book? Her books are usually quite good, but this one is far from it. The concept of a "klone" in a romance novel is intriguing --- What possibilities it could have! (Too bad Ms. Steele couldn't think of any.) The writing was poor and the attempts at comedy lame beyond belief. Thank goodness I rented the book from the library and didn't waste my money.
Rating: Summary: Bad Review: This was a boring book. I read all of Danielle Steel's books and this was one of her worst and most generic text.
Rating: Summary: Worst piece of writing I have ever read. Review: First of all, her research was poor in certain areas. The drug Depakote is used for seizures and for Bipolar [Manic-Depressive] Disorder. What the psychiatrist in this poorly written novel should have ordered for the main character in this book was an anti-psychotic drug, not Depakote. Her grammar was poor, the story too loosely written, and her attempt at humor was sour. The only redeeming quality was that she didn't use her well-worn phrase 'huge blue eyes' at all in the book.
|