Rating: 
Summary: Not a travel book -- A sensitive personal diary!
Review: This is the best book I've read in the last few years! I notice a few folks have the exact opposite view, and that just goes to show that there is no accounting for taste.It's referred to as a travel book by many reviewers, but I found it far more personal than that . Many, if not most travel books, really have very little insight into the country they are about. Elliot is remarkable in that he speaks the language and is steeped in Muslim history and religion. He brings a great deal to what he observes. He is obviously a risk-taker personality and hence one has the vicarious opportunity to experience things most of us would choose not to do on our own. But the best part is his writing! He has a wonderful lyrical writing sensibility. His descriptions work for me, and I can really picture what he is seeing. That is often not the case with other writers. If he never writes another book he can go to his grave knowing that he has written this one and that many people were touched by it!
Rating:
Summary: Best Christmas present
Review: This was an early Christmas present to me from my mom, and I've already burned through 9/10ths of it. It's phenomenal--a great introduction to Afghanistan's rich and luminous history and present, devistated by war. I am horrified by America's role in the destruction of an incredible culture and people, and amazed by the strength of those who are living through it with grace, dignity and hope. This is a great book in the tradition of the best travel narratives, with Elliot's wry and brilliant commentary on surroundings, people, culture, war. America would do well to share it's wealth and serve as a true leader in supporting world peace.
Rating:
Summary: Fascinating insight
Review: Very readable, and a good accompaniment / antidote to the stauration (and stereotypical) media coverage of events in Afghanistan in recent times. The parts that interest me most are the cultural observations - the "humanising" of a people who are otherwise seen as exotic, unfathomable 'others'. I was fascinated by the observations and experiences Elliot has with the very severe and serious looking Afghans in front of the camera, and the warmth and hospitality and cheerfulness he encounters. It was quite chilling when he was trying to get to Bamiyan, a feat he never achieved...and thinking about the loss of those statues under the Taliban. Also the description of the glories of the mosque/medresse at Herat, counterpoised with the reality when he gets there. I just cannot imagine what Afghanistan looked like - would love to see some pictures of it in its glorious past. We see so many images now of rubble and destruction, I can't imagine the avenues of trees and beautiful gardens that once were, but Elliot's word pictures help. However, Elliot's sory is, by necessity, half the story only. Elliot, as a man, can only interact with men during his journeys. This is not, of course, Elliot's fault. I got the feeling in quite a few places that Elliot was startlingly comfortable with all the male company, and hardly missed the company of women. When he was in women's company he was only ever able to objectify them. His reaction to the attractive Afghan woman he encountered (Herat?) was but one example. At the expat gatherings it was the same, and the foreign journalists he usually had something, if not disparaging, then at least arch, to say about them. I do think at times he might be prone to romanticising those with whom he seems to have most sympathy - the mujahadeen of the north. Plenty is known about the atrocities they have been involved with over the years, and organisations like RAWA certainly have no more time for them than the Taleban. He certainly lionises the Northern Alliance, the mujahadeen - it is obvious his sympathies lie with them, which is understandable, seeing as he was with them and also the Soviet occupation was untenable and vile. Nevertheless, we know that the alliance were no saints at all, and we get no sense of that. While I found all his journeys interesting, I loved the section in the latter part of the book about Herat the best. It was the only place where he met resistance and suspicion from the ex-pats (the Swiss and French aid workers), and where he met the most "interesting" non-Afghans, especially the Christian missionaries. Then there was the English couple and their children in the village north of Heart. I would love to have known a bit more about them and their motivations. But best of all was when he visited the shrine and stayed the night with the sufis and the descriptions of the Talebs who came along making their noises of - ecstacy? reverie? This was also the scene of the only time where I felt that he felt any real fear. The tension when he was having to dash back to the missionaries after he had been thrown out of the aid place was real. The footnote on p 254 is really interesting and has made me conscious of the phenomenon he describes every time an item comes on TV about countries where Muslims are the majority: the image of Moslems at prayer. He's right! It does accompany nearly every single news item - those bums raised in the air! And imagine if every time there was an item about, say Northern Ireland, it was accompanied by an image of Caholics genuflecting! Absurd, we would think. As he says it: "I have sometimes wondered what the Moslem interpretation might be of news reports of the West if they always began the footage of glum faces filing into churches in their Sunday best in order to drink the blood of a human God." Recommended.
| 
