Rating: 
Summary: national geographic road atlas
Review: As a professional over-the-road truck driver, I can tell you that there are maps and there are maps. While I still carry a current copy of another major road atlas published specifically for motor carriers, the one I use 95% of the time is the National Geographic. I am ordering the spiral bound 2001 today - have already worn out my 2000! These maps are concise, clear, and easy to read. Simply the best. John C.
Rating:
Summary: national geographic road atlas
Review: As a professional over-the-road truck driver, I can tell you that there are maps and there are maps. While I still carry a current copy of another major road atlas published specifically for motor carriers, the one I use 95% of the time is the National Geographic. I am ordering the spiral bound 2001 today - have already worn out my 2000! These maps are concise, clear, and easy to read. Simply the best. John C.
Rating:
Summary: The best! I own all of the others
Review: By far the best road atlas. Much better than Rand-McNally and AAA and others. Maps are very colorful, have lots of interesting details and features, like state parks. More city maps and in greater detail. Large easy to use mileage charts. National Parks section. Pages easy to turn. Solid front and back covers. This is the one to own.
Rating:
Summary: The best! I own all of the others
Review: By far the best road atlas. Much better than Rand-McNally and AAA and others. Maps are very colorful, have lots of interesting details and features, like state parks. More city maps and in greater detail. Large easy to use mileage charts. National Parks section. Pages easy to turn. Solid front and back covers. This is the one to own.
Rating:
Summary: Outstanding
Review: Don't even think about buying the Rand McNally. This one is it! Graphics are a whole lot better, with much more useful information!
Rating: 
Summary: A Mixed Bag
Review: I own all three major US road atlases (Rand McNally and AAA being the other two), and none of them is perfect. This one is probably the most visually beautiful atlas you're ever likely to see. Each individual map is a work of art in its own right. The maps are lovely to look at, and the section with maps of the National Parks is a nice bonus.HOWEVER, if you're actually planning on using this atlas to drive someplace, don't. The atlas is far less detailed than either the Rand McNally or AAA versions. Looking for a small, remote town? You won't find it here. And the indexes are abbreviated, meaning not all the towns marked on the maps will be found in the index. The city maps are tiny and show virtually no detail. They contain so little information that they can't really be used for anything; I wonder why they were even included. One great thing about this atlas is the number of interesting sites it marks. It includes not only "official" sites like National and State Parks, but also the more off-the-wall sites that you wouldn't find in any other atlas. (For example, the site of the 1969 Woodstock concert in Bethel, NY.) The atlas may be worth buying for these locations alone. In summary, this is the perfect atlas for someone who likes to look at maps, but who doesn't actually need to use them.
Rating:
Summary: The New Standard
Review: I was a life-long Rand McNally atlas user until I met the 1999 edition of National Geographic road atlas. I liked it so much I bought the 2000 edition for the library I work in. My name is Richard B. -- and I'm a mapaholic. I've treasured maps since childhood. I read them, study them, collect them, and critique them. But my loyalty isn't to the scrap of paper that it's printed on, but to their representation of the world of roads. A map is only as good as it's first mistake -- if the next map has fewer mistakes [of towns, roads, or even graphics], it becomes the new favorite. In the case of National Geographic's road atlas, the great readability makes it the new champion. I haven't gone counting for hamlets in obscure corners of the country (like I used to -- with my own hometown) to find mistakes or shortcomings. The difference was readily apparent the first time I opened it up. Imagine the design principles of Edward Tufte applied to a road atlas -- clean, legible design that doesn't interfere with the information being conveyed. My thirty-something eyes still read pretty well, but I appreciate the care that went into making these maps easier to use, including more detailed city and tourist destination maps, low gloss paper [unlike some of those European atlases I've used...], and an exceptional book design to aid navigation within the atlas itself. Don't believe me -- you don't know me from Adam -- but trust your own eyes. Look at the atlases and road maps that you've used over the years (or, at least, kept stored in your car), and then compare what you see to the fresh design of National Geographic road atlases. See if you don't agree that they set a new standard by which the other atlases must now be judged. Happy trails to you, R.B.
Rating:
Summary: An atlas from the people who know how to make maps
Review: The best road atlas I've ever seen (and I'm a REAL map nut!!). Good detail. Very effective use of color. The listing of points of interest along roadways is most useful (that's how my wife and I found Carhenge).
Rating:
Summary: great help
Review: very good maps, nice pictures...dont know why it is always out of stock though...i would've thought that mapquest would have printed more of this wonderful atlas. A must for every car tourist!
Rating: 
Summary: Visually Pleasing, Cartographically Wanting
Review: Very nice appearance and many features, but it has consistently failed my wife and I for helping us find our way around. It is not as detailed as the AAA atlas in such matters as exits and rest stops, and we even got lost one time due to this lack. We will never buy this one again and will throw it away as soon as we buy a different atlas we think we can trust.
| 
