Rating: 
Summary: A Powerful Experience
Review: "War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength" George Orwell dives into the Depths of communist society, and sees through the eyes of Winston Smith, an aging man and a member of "The Party" of the country of Oceania. A series of events leads Winston to the love of his life, Julia, and they both plan to join a resistance against the Party. But Winston finds out that you can't trust anyone in a communist society. Orwell did an excellent job of placing the reader in the center of the lies that is the communist government. His writing style is captivating and everything about the book is realistic and believable, everything from the brainwashing of children to the technology that was available. The book is filled with interesting twists and turns in the plot that keep the reader engrossed in an excellently told story. I found it very difficult to put this book down once I picked it up. I almost found myself awaiting the moment that I could read it again, which was a surprise. I had heard that this book was a boring political commentary, but it was far from that. Orwell slips in views on the human spirit, testing it's limits, and eventually stating that everyone has a breaking point. The dark ending to this haunting image of the future cast from his imagination back in 1949, still holds true to what people can observe in mankind today. One can can be thoroughly entertained while being enlightened at the same time. All in all 1984 is a book worth reading. Also, a short novel for younger readers I suggest is THE LOSERS CLUB by Richard Perez
Rating:
Summary: Powerful story.
Review: Imagine if the only thing you had control over, or owned was your mind? But, even that has limitations. You are not given the freedom to love, learn, or think of yourself. You lived your life in constant fear, knowing that Big Brother was always watching you. This is Winston's prison. But Winston was a "freethinker" - he wants to find out what life was like before the Revolution. He is willing to risk being "vaporized" to find the truth. This book is a classic, but the story is amazing - the strength to risk everything to find the truth and learn to love.
Rating: 
Summary: Ugh. Gives me the shivvers.
Review: This book is unrelentingly, amazingly depressing. It's absolutely graphically realistic in it's descriptions, and the story - I'm gonna give it away here - does not end happily. I read this in high school and have never forgotten it; it frightened me then and it still frightens me. The word is bleak. You should still read it. You should not only read books that give you happiness, or catharsis, or what you want; those are candy for your mind and will not tell you harsh truths. You should also read books that give you gifts you don't want, gifts that make you uncomfortable or upset or frightened. Books that point out things you'd much rather you could ignore and hope they'd go away. That's why this is a classic; not because of stupendous writing or anything else (I've seen better writing). I still hate this book. And I still gave it 4 stars.
Rating:
Summary: The greatest novel ever written
Review: This book demands many readings; every time you do so you will gain something you missed (mainly because you will, hopefully, mature between each reading and thus gain heightened awareness of the subtleties of the novel). I disagree with another reviewer who said this could never happen; anyone with a cursory knowledge of Nazi Germany or Communist Russia can tell you it almost did happen. In Germany children denounced their parents to the Gestapo; in Russia there were purges of all political opponents. In both countries, there was history revision to suit the government. Hitler attempted to create a perfect society chillingly like 1984's Oceania, with all unattractive or deviant elements eliminated or pushed aside (like the proles). Also, anyone who has read The Brothers Karamazov can see the strong influence of "The Grand Inquisitor" in this book. The book is terrifying not so much in its view of the future but in its climax, when the Party proves itself capable of destroying all human feeling and individuality. Winston believes he will die hating Big Brother, and thus be free, but in the end he is killed with only love in his heart for the Party and B.B.; there can be no freedom. The story shows Winston as the last of his kind, the last with memory of the past and hatred for the Party combined. In the end both are eradicated; the Party controls everything. It has the power to say 2+2=5, and can prove it so; it can repeal the laws of nature and no one can perceive it otherwise. Winston Smith knew how to die free, but the Party destroyed even the desire to do so. It did not kill him until it knew he was "cured" and loved Big Brother. No one can be free; only the Party can exist in people's minds. Horrifying, and absolutely necessary. This is the most important book ever written.
Rating:
Summary: The Past is Present
Review: Though it was published in 1949, George Orwell created an insightful look into a possible future with his writing of 1984. The story takes place in London, England in a "super-state" called Oceania that is perpetually at war with one of two other "super-states", Eurasia or Eastasia. The government, run by a figurehead party leader called Big Brother, monitors all actions, facial expressions (thus, thoughts), and conversations via "telescreens". Any potential threat to the government that is caught by these screens is punishable by death, and Spies or Thought Police carry out the sentence. I thoroughly enjoyed this book because of the rising and falling suspense throughout it. I expected this novel to be a dry political book, but it seemed to be one of personal change and survival in a world of conformity and unrealized oppression. The love story sub-plot running through 1984 is one of companionship and unity instead of lust and personal gain. The removal of liberty, freedom, and individuality disturbed me, but these restrictions were the driving force behind the actions taken by the two main characters. The circumstances in this novel seem to have become commonplace occurrences to some degree, and that is what seems scary in the novel. Now that there are cameras monitoring every public place, Orwell's "future" doesn't seem so far-fetched. The events in the story inspire deep thought and moral reflection; I thought about this book for days after I finished it. I recommend this book to anyone. There are elements of action, drama, romance, and mystery in this novel, and it's easy to see why it is talked about after 1984 has come and gone.
Rating:
Summary: Most important book of the 20th century
Review: Firstly this is a fantastic book and a fantastic read. At times brilliantly lurid and erotic and at other times completely bleek and depressing. At all times it is however engaging to the point of being one of those cant-put-down type books. Secondly this book is just as important as Hayek's Road to Serfdom. Although Hayek's treatise rightly or wrongly (and I would tend towards the latter) skewed economic thinking towards the economic rationalist line so favoured by the Friedmanites, it was 1984 that put the fear of god into people who care little for economics. It has helped shape the world that we live in today. As a side note, the final part of Simon Schama's History of Britain is a look at The Two Winstons. Namely Churchill and Orwell through the main character of this book. It is an excellent exploration of the two men and really gives an idea about who they were and what they really stood for.
Rating:
Summary: I propose some rules for reviewing 1984...
Review: 1) Read Erich Fromm's afterward. 2) Don't imply that 1984 was somehow meant to be a prediction for the state of the real world in 1984. Even if that were the case, the fact that he wasn't 100% right DOES NOT need to be reiterated for the 8 billionth time. 3) Don't reduce this complex and subtle masterpiece to a mere allegory for Stalinist totalitarianism. 4) If you don't know that Orwell was a liberal with strong socialist leanings, read some of his other books and possibly a biography before thinking that all 1984 is about is damning communism or socialism. 5) If your review is shorter than three sentences, you're probably not saying anything new, so don't even bother. 6) If you just finished reading 1984 for your high school English class, PLEASE do not write a review. Wait until you've gone through college, and read it again. (related to Rule 5) 7) Don't call Orwell "Eric Blair" - as if you and he were old school chums. As a writer, he is George Orwell. Thank you. Following these rules, there would be about 50 reviews left and maybe a person would have time to read them all!
Rating:
Summary: This MIGHT happen if, well, people were perfect.
Review: Not all people, just the people putting it together. It is a well thought out book, present with quite a few respectable theories about the whole workings of the system and what would happen in the system. But the thing is, unlike Brave New World, which I think, of
the famous two speculative sci-fi stories, this and BWN, at least would work, and could work if enough energy was put into it, 1984 would most likely never come about. Since people aren't necessarily aren't conditioned, as shown by, of course, Winston who believe what's going on is wrong, could, with alot of work, turn around the entire system the Party had set up. If planned perfectly, and set up by the most dedicated of the dedicated, then maybe, maybe it could happen. But then of course, you'd have to worry about the other countries also, who would most likely help out an old ally taken over by a bunch of goobers. Read Brave New World to read about something that actually could happen! (And just because Huxley is cooler than Orwell.)
Rating:
Summary: The Best Book Ever!
Review: Just read the [darn] thing! Trust me! If you don't really now what it's about, the better. I read 1984 i Mexico on the beach and let me tell you the only thig I remember about Mexico is th ehot women and 1984...the hot women first of course. Read the [darn] book already!!!
Rating:
Summary: reality then v reality now
Review: You've probably already read the other reviews on this site, so i'll just concentrate on my opinion on the relevance of this book in our contemporary society
1984 is a stark warning against totalitarianism. Written in 1948, Orwell's depiction of a government-controlled society seemed absurd when published, contrasting the imnumerable amount of people that've said how real it seems now than it did then in western society One interesting factor is the geography of the planet. We are told very little and all we're told is that there're three 'super-states', Oceania, Eastasia and Eurasia. Oceania is constantly at war with a vague and distant enemy, and is always switching between being allies and enemies with Eurasia and Eastasia. Comparing it to today, just what is this 'war on terrorism, and how threatened do you really feel about it (disregarding media opinion)?. America and Britian, both independantly throughout the years and in allegiance with each other recently, are constantly at war with an enemy. WWI, WWII, Cold war, Korean war, Vietnam war, Falklands War, Gulf war I and more recently Gulf war II. Societal opinions + perceptions are influenced by media, but who are we at war with? The "War on Terror" clearly highlights the fact that there is no tangible enemy anymore. Explained more clearly in Goldstein's passage in the book, we are constantly at war because it keeps us united, and stops us fighting one another, stops us fighting the government. Another interesting factor in book is the issue of government surveillance. 'Telescreen' in homes, Cameras everywhere you walk, Microphones even in the countryside to detect rebellious behaviour. Although key issues stated in the book aren't as extreme, the power the government now has to keep tabs on people and spy on them has reached limits it has never reached before. The 'Party' explain that this surveillance is for the benefit of the people (note: animal farm) and they constantly reassure the citizens, or 'comrades', that life was worst off before they came along. Similarly, our governments are constantly re-assuring us how much better our lives are because of them. I.D cards are being proposed under the pretence that they will 'eliminate terrorism and benefit fraud', which are something the people are 'persuaded they want' because they media tells them they do. The third, conclusively and i think most importantly, is the way this book challenges the fact we (society in 1948) take our freedom for granted. One passage in the book which sticks out in my mind specifically is when the main charactor walks through a lower-class area, and is terrified that the police patrols might stop him and ask him questions; 'what are you doing in this part of town? is this your usual way home'? etc. Similarly, if someone was walking down the street at 2am in a dangerous part of town for no particular reason, it would be deemed socially strange, thus encouraging this person not to do so, and do what everyone else does. If someone dresses in clothes that you do not usually see, he/she would be regarded as a weirdo, a social outcast".My point is, how free do we really think we are as a society these days? How easily are we opinionated by the media? Our society is edging closer and closer to the reality that is 1984, and i recommend that you read it, it will change the way you perceive news articles, and you'll question all these erosions of civil liberties that have been happening. By the way, Orwell didn't intend for this vision to be reality in the year 1984. He wrote it in 1948, so he just switched the last 2 letters around.
| 
