<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: Semi-Interesting Anecdotes, Not-So-Crisply Told
Review: For those of us who love the history of baseball as much as the game itself, this is a, "must get". I found all the anecdotes from the PBS Ken Burns documentary "Baseball" here plus a bunch that didn't make it. (You may recall, that Daniel Okrent was heavily featured in the PBS series) The only missing element that would cause me to bump my ratings to 5 stars would be(you guessed it) photos. With the unearthing of Charles Conlon's negatives they would have a trove of other 18,000 images to choose from - most of which have yet to be published in this half of the century. (Only a fraction of these incredible images made it into the Abram's book, "The Golden Age of Baseball") Of course, this would drive the cost of the book up and possibly detract from the wonderful stories here - I wonder out loud if it isn't perfect just the way it is... Never the less, you will be all the poorer if this book in not in your baseball library, photos or not! /fwa
Rating: 
Summary: Fun stories from the national pastime
Review: Here is a treasury of great stories from the game of baseball. Collected and ordered from the 1800's down to today. You see some of the great characters from the game, and a look back to simpler times. Some very amusing stories are sure to keep you interested.
Rating:
Summary: Great book for baseball fans on the east coast
Review: This book does a great job of telling stories about Yankees, Red Socks, and the Yankees. This book has a lot of history and, unfortunately, a lot of actual quotes (profanity and all)! Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed the book, I just can't let my son read it. There was more listed in the book about Steinbrenner's early years as the Yankees' owner than the decade of the Big Red Machine and the oldest professional baseball team combined. I admit that I am a Reds' fan.
Rating:
Summary: Semi-Interesting Anecdotes, Not-So-Crisply Told
Review: This is not a bad book: It's just very sluggisly paced without much style. In the hands of real sportswriters it could have been a gas. The authors are far too reverential: Cooperstown to them is some kind of holy shrine, and anyone with even a smidgen of skepticism is an Unbeliever. Hey, it's already late 1998. Why write like it's 1958?
<< 1 >>
| 
