<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: The book was unfocused on its topic.
Review: I bought the book hoping to gain some added insight on how to preserve the game I love, but Joe would meander off on topics comparing The Big Red Machine to the Yankees and letting us know things he thought managers did wrong in last year's post season. 50% of the book was a good read, but it wasn't why I bought it. Consequently I was disappointed in what Joe did with such an important topic.
Rating: 
Summary: Joe Morgan is the Smartest Man in Baseball.
Review: I picked up this book in the bargain bin at a bookstore (...). This is a book every serious fan should read. It's probably the best baseballl book I've ever read. Joe Morgan knows baseball. He should be the commissioner. What happened to the four man rotation? Should Pete Rose be in the Hall of Fame? What should the Lords of Baseball (excuse me Dick Young) do? Joe knows. Read this book. You'll know too.
Rating:
Summary: Joe Morgan is the Smartest Man in Baseball.
Review: I picked up this book in the bargain bin at a bookstore (...). This is a book every serious fan should read. It's probably the best baseballl book I've ever read. Joe Morgan knows baseball. He should be the commissioner. What happened to the four man rotation? Should Pete Rose be in the Hall of Fame? What should the Lords of Baseball (excuse me Dick Young) do? Joe knows. Read this book. You'll know too.
Rating: 
Summary: great book
Review: I RECOMEND THIS BOOK TO ANY BASEBALL FAN.JOE EXPLAINED WHAT IS GOING WRONG WITH OUR NATIONAL PASTTIME AND WAYS TO IMPROVE OUR BEAUTIFUL GAME. GREAT BOOK.I ENJOYED VERY MUCH EVEN THOUGHT I DID NOT AGREED HIS COMMENTS ABOUT CAL RIPKEN STREAK. I HOPE BUD SELIG AND THE BASEBALL OWNERS READ THIS BOOK.
Rating:
Summary: Pete Rose should read this one!
Review: I've always enjoyed Joe Morgan as a baseball player and in the broadcast booth, but I was a bit leery about this book. I shouldn't have worried. Joe did an excellent job sharing his thoughts on what's wrong with Major League Baseball as well as what's right. I don't always agree with his opinions, but that's what makes the book interesting. Pete Rose should read this book and take some of his former teammate's advice to heart. Joe's suggestions to Pete are not particularly new, but he's got insight into the man that many other commentators do not. I definitely recommend this book for any baseball fan.
Rating:
Summary: Pete Rose should read this one!
Review: I've always enjoyed Joe Morgan as a baseball player and in the broadcast booth, but I was a bit leery about this book. I shouldn't have worried. Joe did an excellent job sharing his thoughts on what's wrong with Major League Baseball as well as what's right. I don't always agree with his opinions, but that's what makes the book interesting. Pete Rose should read this book and take some of his former teammate's advice to heart. Joe's suggestions to Pete are not particularly new, but he's got insight into the man that many other commentators do not. I definitely recommend this book for any baseball fan.
Rating:
Summary: Joe Knows
Review: Joe knows more about baseball than Admiral Doubleday. It is an honor and a privilege to read Joe's insight into the game. I am not so sure Joe is on base in the last chapter dealing with minorities in executive positions. Joe went back to college to earn his degree because he promised his mother he would. Do all of the minority candiates Joe speaks about being qualified for high level positions in MLB have degrees? Is that a perequisite? Worth thinking about...
Rating:
Summary: Lots of Food for Thought
Review: Joe Morgan is a thoughtful and intelligent commentator on baseball. It's apparent in his work for ESPN and, now, in his most recent book. While I do not agree with some of his views, i.e., his high opinion of Bud Selig or his touting of revenue sharing as the solution to all of baseball's economic woes, he argues his points thoroughly and rationally, unlike many so-called sports "authorities." My only reservation about the book comes from the fact that, as a former player,he tends to exonerate players and their union from any culpability in the game's current environment. However, his commentary on his former teammate, Pete Rose, should be mandatory reading for those with short memories about Rose's actions.
Rating: 
Summary: I was hoping for something more informative and entertaining
Review: Joe's book was eloquently written. Near the end of it he discussed racial issues, some of which were quite valid. Joe took it to another level, where, in my opinion, he was reading racial discrimination into just about everything associated with black players. I saw paranoia in it. I found him pontificating on several issues, treating the readerin a patronizing manner. I had hope for something better, more humourous, because baseball is, after all, a "Game". It's not desert storm, the Vietnam War, world poverty and/or peace.
Rating:
Summary: Lots of Food for Thought
Review: The time honored advice given to all aspiring writers is "Write what you know." Well Joe Morgan knows baseball, so a book from Mr. Morgan on the sport is bound to be insightful. "Long Balls, No Strikes" is subtitled "What Baseball Must Do to Keep the Good Times Rolling." If that were the only subject, we'd have, at best, a term paper rather than a book, so Mr. Morgan liberally injects additional topics to fill in the page count. Fortunately, this adds to the enjoyment of a pretty good baseball read for the modern era. He freely dispenses (and appropriately labels) his opinions on teams, players, officials and the atmosphere of modern-day baseball operations. One important word of caution: remember, Joe Morgan is first and foremost a PLAYER, so bear that in mind as you weigh his opinions and consider alternative points of view. That doesn't diminish the flavor in any way -- it's a good book for the fan. One interesting comparison he makes is between the 1998 Yankees and the Big Red Machine of 1975 (yes, he was a star member of that assemblage). Not surprisingly, he rates that Cincinnati group a shade above the New Yorkers and challenges them to repeat their ownership of the championship banner (as did the 1975 Reds). Well, they did. I wonder if he'd reconsider his rating? One minor point: the book had too many very careless typos reflecting a poor editing job.
<< 1 >>
| 
