The Race to the White Continent: Voyages to the Antarctic

Rating:
Summary: MORE A RAMBLE THAN A RACE
Review: .

The last few years has seen a spotlight put on Antarctica. We've had the success of all the recent Shackleton books, TV shows and IMAX films on the Frozen South. Is this the explanation for the current level of popularity of polar exploration history? My own fascination in all matters Antarctican stems from a boyhood spent in Hobart Tasmania. It was from this port that many ships head south; south of the Circle. I grew up with tales of Cook, Scott, and Mawson and their Antarctic adventures.

I bought Gurney's book on the strength of the title and the publisher's blurb. On the author's own acknowledgment in the Introduction it was the marketing and publicity department of his publisher who gave the book its title. We have to get through 100 pages of pre-amble before we get to the real subject of his book. Does detail on circumnavigation of Australia by Matthew Flinders in 1802 belong here? This story is better covered elsewhere. The first crossing of Australia on foot by John Eyre is another strange addition particularly when coupled with a parenthetic (and absurd) observation that modern travellers face certain death in this hostile environment if they get off their train in the middle of the Nullarbor Plain.

However, we do get the benefit of Gurney's encyclopedic knowledge, in all matters maritime. We learn that sailors called the weevils in their biscuits, bargemen. We get familiar with all the arcane terminology from the age of sailing ships. His use of extracts from the 1867 "Sailor's Word-Book" at the head of each chapter is a neat touch.

The notes at the end of each chapter add very little that could not otherwise be included in the text. They give a pseudo-academic touch, which is not warranted. Editing of the book is very sloppy, with many typos creeping through. Structurally the text contains many convolute passages and at times, repetitious detail.

His emphasis on the farcical Wilkes' expedition would have been better downplayed with more detail on the efforts of Ross and D'Urville. At no times does the sense of a "Race" really come through. Examining the timing and context of the voyages, it was coincidence that the English, French and Americans were on government expeditions at the same time.

By most people's reckoning, the most exciting phase of Antarctic exploration would have to be the race to the South Pole that took place in the first decade of the 20th Century. Gurney's book serves really only as a preliminary "backgrounder" for readers who wish to understand these later events. The most accessible and delightful encapsulation of Antarctic exploration is found in the 1940-1950's era "The Children's Encyclopedia" edited by Arthur Mee. It's worth digging out Volume 9 and reading "The South Pole Men."

Gurney's book would be a useful addition to the shelves of readers who like histories of scientific and naval exploration. However, many more authoritative and entertaining books on this subject are around.

Rating:
Summary: MORE A RAMBLE THAN A RACE
Review: .

The last few years has seen a spotlight put on Antarctica. We've had the success of all the recent Shackleton books, TV shows and IMAX films on the Frozen South. My own fascination in all matters Antarctican stems from a boyhood spent in Hobart Tasmania. It was from this port that many ships head south - to south of the Circle. I grew up with tales of Cook, Scott, and Mawson and their Antarctic adventures.

I bought Gurney's book on the strength of the title and the publisher's blurb. The author acknowledges in his "Introduction" it was the marketing and publicity department of his publisher, who rejected his suggestion and gave the book its "racy" title. The title is quite misleading.

We have to get through 100 pages of pre-amble before we get to the real subject of his book. Does detail on the circumnavigation of Australia by Matthew Flinders in 1802 belong here? This story is better covered elsewhere. The first crossing of Australia on foot by John Eyre is another strange addition particularly when coupled with a parenthetic (and absurd) observation that modern travellers face certain death in this hostile environment if they get off their train in the middle of the Nullarbor Plain.

However, we do get the benefit of Gurney's encyclopedic knowledge, in all matters maritime. We learn that sailors called the weevils in their biscuits, bargemen. We get familiar with all the arcane terminology from the age of sailing ships. His use of extracts from the 1867 "Sailor's Word-Book" at the head of each chapter is a neat touch.

The notes at the end of each chapter add very little that could not otherwise be included in the text. More bluntly, they look like off-cuts from the editor's desk. They give a pseudo-academic flavor, which is not warranted. Editing of the book is very sloppy, with many typos creeping through. Structurally the text contains frequent convolute passages and at times, repetitious detail. Particularly annoying is Gurney's tendency to refer to his characters' ages in many passages. Yet often we are not given the year in which he's talking about and it's impossible to work this out from the context. On page 206 we have "... the sixty-two-year-old Humboldt who stood like a colossus ..." No year is specified. This is very confusing. When dealing with historical subjects, dates are the key references for the reader trying to follow the author's story.

His emphasis on the farcical Wilkes' expedition would have been better downplayed with more detail on the efforts of Ross and D'Urville. At no times does the sense of a "Race" really come through. Examining the timing and context of the voyages, it was coincidence that the English, French and Americans were on government expeditions at the same time. No evidence is provided by Gurney that the 3 countries were in a race, as the title of the book boldly purports.

By most people's reckoning, the most exciting phase of Antarctic exploration would have to be the real race, the one to the South Pole that took place in the early years of the 20th Century. Gurney's book serves really only as a preliminary "backgrounder" for readers who wish to understand these later events. The most accessible and delightful encapsulation of Antarctic exploration is found in the 1940-1950's era "The Children's Encyclopedia" edited by Arthur Mee. It's worth digging out Volume 9 and reading "The South Pole Men."

Gurney's book would be a useful addition to the shelves of readers who like histories of scientific and naval exploration. However, many more authoritative and entertaining books on this subject are around.

As a footnote, the book's cover illustration shows Sir Ernest Shackleton's ship "Endurance" locked in the ice in 1914. His incredible story is not covered in this book, nor is credit given to the photographer of this well-known image, the famous Frank Hurley.

Rating:
Summary: Enjoyable book on a Winters' night...
Review: The race to the white continent...voyages to the antarctic. Alan Gurney. Did like the read. Gurney was good with the James Clark Ross discovery of the magic of the Ross Sea and Mount Erebus. I had the pleasure to live there. With the Royal Society Range for a backdrop, Minna Bluff to the south. A view of a lifetime. Of the coming storms... Great touch on that. I thought a little boring is the take of the Wilkes Expedition. A British viewpoint anyway...I did think the Gurney spill on Dumont D' Urville's was a plus...A good read...Next up try "Barrow's Boys"...by Fergus Fleming. 5 stars...easy.

Rating:
Summary: Two great expeditions and one laughable one
Review: This is Alan Gurney's second book on Antarctic exploration. His first, "Below the Convergence," covered the early era of Antarctic voyaging, up to the beginning of the 19th century. This book starts with a look at Pacific and Australian explorations to set the scene and bridge the gap, then pulls in to focus on two great Antarctic expeditions of the 1840s, and a third that was less impressive. The great expeditions were the French Navy expedition led by Dumont d'Urville in the Astrolabe and Zelee and the classic Royal Navy explorations of James Clark Ross with HMS Erebus and HMS Terror. These two men and their crews of seamen and scientists were the first to begin to make Antarctica a real place, rather than a realm of conjecture, and the names of the ships, the men, and their families remain scattered around the Antarctic to this day, fastened to their discoveries - Adelie Land, the Ross Ice Shelf, Mt. Erebus, McMurdo Sound, to name only a few. Gurney ably tells the tales of these expeditions, from their inception to their return, and the sad fate of their leaders - d'Urville killed in a railway wreck with his wife and son, Ross dead before his time, probably of drink, after the early death of his wife and his unsuccessful search for the lost Franklin expedition in the Arctic. The third expedition is the US Navy expedition led by Lt. Charles Wilkes in USS Vincennes, and if anything Gurney is too kind to this somewhat fraught endeavor. Wilkes, who promptly promoted himself commodore and hoisted a distinguishing pennant as soon as he was out of reach of US Navy authority, treated both his officers and the scientists assigned to the expedition like dirt, discovered a vast amount of entirely imaginary territory, and was courtmartialed on his return (but unfortunately remained in the Navy to commit numerous stupidities during the Civil War). All in all, good reading for anyone interested in Antarctic exploration, and one wonders if Gurney will go for a trilogy with a third book about the Heroic Era of Antarctic exploration.

Rating:
Summary: Two great expeditions and one laughable one
Review: This is Alan Gurney's second book on Antarctic exploration. His first, "Below the Convergence," covered the early era of Antarctic voyaging, up to the beginning of the 19th century. This book starts with a look at Pacific and Australian explorations to set the scene and bridge the gap, then pulls in to focus on two great Antarctic expeditions of the 1840s, and a third that was less impressive. The great expeditions were the French Navy expedition led by Dumont d'Urville in the Astrolabe and Zelee and the classic Royal Navy explorations of James Clark Ross with HMS Erebus and HMS Terror. These two men and their crews of seamen and scientists were the first to begin to make Antarctica a real place, rather than a realm of conjecture, and the names of the ships, the men, and their families remain scattered around the Antarctic to this day, fastened to their discoveries - Adelie Land, the Ross Ice Shelf, Mt. Erebus, McMurdo Sound, to name only a few. Gurney ably tells the tales of these expeditions, from their inception to their return, and the sad fate of their leaders - d'Urville killed in a railway wreck with his wife and son, Ross dead before his time, probably of drink, after the early death of his wife and his unsuccessful search for the lost Franklin expedition in the Arctic. The third expedition is the US Navy expedition led by Lt. Charles Wilkes in USS Vincennes, and if anything Gurney is too kind to this somewhat fraught endeavor. Wilkes, who promptly promoted himself commodore and hoisted a distinguishing pennant as soon as he was out of reach of US Navy authority, treated both his officers and the scientists assigned to the expedition like dirt, discovered a vast amount of entirely imaginary territory, and was courtmartialed on his return (but unfortunately remained in the Navy to commit numerous stupidities during the Civil War). All in all, good reading for anyone interested in Antarctic exploration, and one wonders if Gurney will go for a trilogy with a third book about the Heroic Era of Antarctic exploration.