Rating: Summary: A winner! This book is toung and cheek satire Review: Anyone who knows anything about professional assassins knows that Greyboar is usually the best at the trade. However, if the intended victim can engage Greyboar in his passion, not sex but philosophical discussion and debate, the target might survive in a Sherherazade type of way. Like any pro, Greyboar has an agent Ignace and he hopes a significant other in the nearsighted swordswoman Cat who he just met at his favorite drinking spot the Sign of the Trough. However, Greyboar has also learned that his estranged sibling, the amazon Gwendolyn has a lover who apparently has vanished perhaps into the bows of hell or some place even worse geographically. A commission for his sibling is not what Greyboar or Ignace prefers, but family, even a card-carrying member of the dwarf liberation movement, is still family. A visit to THE PHILOSOPHICAL STRANGLER is a visit to weirdness where even Rod Serling would wonder if this might be one step beyond the Twilight Zone. The story line is satire at its sharpest as the cast skewer many of modern society's values. The plot is more a series of vignettes tied together by the key cast members rather than a novel, but fans of ironic fantasy will devour this tale and demand more from Eric Flint. Harriet Klausner
Rating: Summary: A wonderfully whimsical and satirical, if wandering, fantasy Review: I found this book a wonderful blend of moral and philosophical commentary and fantasy/mind candy. It didn't read like many fantasies because the plot was not the author's main interest. Rather it seemed as though Flynt wanted to present ideas for both the characters and the reader to mull and idle over, which I just loved. I will say that because of this, the book rambles and wanders rather than leading a clear path from point to point. If you don't like that style, you will probably dislike the book immensely. But for the reader who wants a little intellectual fodder with their fantasy, I think this is a great choice and I am personally hoping to find that others of Flynt's books provide more of the same. And in contrast with other reviewers, I enjoyed the ending. While it was somewhat anticlimactic, I found the ending unpredictable and satisfyingly appropriate for the characters.
Rating: Summary: One of the worst books I have ever read Review: I have to admit, I bought this book because it seemed to compare itself to books like "Myth Adventures" by David Asprin, or "Xanth" by Piers Anthony. However, knowing Eric Flint, I should have expected something else. Eric Flint is probably one of the most unoriginal writers I have ever read. His "1632" is such a blatent rip-off of the "Island In The Sea Of Time" series by Bruce Sterling, it is not even funny. But his writing ability is much worse, leaving me that time with an unsatisfying "alternate history" story, which is my favorite genre. The cover of Strangler tells us it is "Monty Python meets Tolkein". Well, that is true. We get the tasteless parts of Python, mixed with the dry bore-you-to-death parts of Tolkein. We do not get any part of Python's humor, nor do we get Tolkein's intelligence. The result is very unsatisfying. I have to admit, I find little to recommend this book to anybody. Even the map at the beginning is so bizzare, that it makes no sense. A good example is when Mr. Flint takes us on a 7 page description of a bar. 3 of those pages are about the physical bar where the drinks are served! I mean, who cares??? He must have been paid per word, because there is so much stuffing thrown in it is amazing. It gave me the feeling of a 30 minute script blown up to a 2 hour movie. And to make it worse, there are so many anachronisms thrown in, it is quickly obvious that he once again forgot to do any real editing or research. A good example is in the preface of the story, where the main characters actually get into a Hansom Cab! For goodness sake, make it a generic carriage, not a specific type of cab from 19th Century England! I can go on and on about these blunders, but it is to painfull to recall them all, and it would make this review as bloated as the original book was. Just avoid this book, it is not worth it.
Rating: Summary: One of the worst books I have ever read Review: I have to admit, I bought this book because it seemed to compare itself to books like "Myth Adventures" by David Asprin, or "Xanth" by Piers Anthony. However, knowing Eric Flint, I should have expected something else. Eric Flint is probably one of the most unoriginal writers I have ever read. His "1632" is such a blatent rip-off of the "Island In The Sea Of Time" series by Bruce Sterling, it is not even funny. But his writing ability is much worse, leaving me that time with an unsatisfying "alternate history" story, which is my favorite genre. The cover of Strangler tells us it is "Monty Python meets Tolkein". Well, that is true. We get the tasteless parts of Python, mixed with the dry bore-you-to-death parts of Tolkein. We do not get any part of Python's humor, nor do we get Tolkein's intelligence. The result is very unsatisfying. I have to admit, I find little to recommend this book to anybody. Even the map at the beginning is so bizzare, that it makes no sense. A good example is when Mr. Flint takes us on a 7 page description of a bar. 3 of those pages are about the physical bar where the drinks are served! I mean, who cares??? He must have been paid per word, because there is so much stuffing thrown in it is amazing. It gave me the feeling of a 30 minute script blown up to a 2 hour movie. And to make it worse, there are so many anachronisms thrown in, it is quickly obvious that he once again forgot to do any real editing or research. A good example is in the preface of the story, where the main characters actually get into a Hansom Cab! For goodness sake, make it a generic carriage, not a specific type of cab from 19th Century England! I can go on and on about these blunders, but it is to painfull to recall them all, and it would make this review as bloated as the original book was. Just avoid this book, it is not worth it.
Rating: Summary: The Dialectic Undone Review: I wish I could have given this froth a 3 1/2. This is an amusing book, with amusing characters who are constantly in the midst of amusing mayhem, murdering mostly deserving folk for profit...but it's no more than that. I even laughed out loud a few times...not often, but a few times. Do you understand my problem? This book has a lot of wasted potential. It was like a series of short stories strung together with very thin connecting material. It's a very light weight tale, unfortunately in hardbound, with spotty, but amusing, character development. This wasn't up to Flint's usual standards...but amusing, rather amusing.
Rating: Summary: Not bad. Review: It's like the shadow of a Platonic Ideal of a fantasy-humor novel. Think Fritz Leiber's Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser meet Pulp Fiction - only funnier. This book probably should have been written by Avram Davidson, who could have milked the silly names and goofy situations for a lot more literary goodness. As it stands, hey, I've paid more for worse.
Rating: Summary: Warning: May cause hysterical laughter Review: Oh Dear! How did a mixture Fantasy and a bunch of low life characters get so funny? The life of a strangler's agent gets horribly complicated when the strangler discovers philosophy. Do _NOT_ read this book while eating or drinking in public.
Rating: Summary: Cynical assassins Review: Set in medieval times in an unknown realm, similar in tone to Sir Apropos of Nothing. Story of an assassin (the Strangler) and his manager. A bit gruesome in parts, but also includes tales of derring-do and humor. The manager is the narrator and he talks a good game of cynicism, while not thinking too highly of himself.
Rating: Summary: Even funnier than Discworld Review: The book is written from the viewpoint of Ignace (the whiney, I call him), agent to Greyboar, greatest assassin/strangler in the world, "the man by whom professional thuggee should be judged." You'd think that would be an easy life. Sit back and let the assignments roll in. The Amazon editorial commentary on this book mentioned the problems: Philosophical conundrums and ethical dilemmas. What it didn't mention is the greatest horror of all, LOST COMMISSIONS. Mind you, you get all three of these things in just the first chapter of the book. After that, things get weird. This book is a riot. You'll understand after you've read it why I'll never be able to deal with the term "aftermarket" again without a giggle. My advice, get this book, and Fetch the Comfy Chair, one you can't fall out of no matter how hard you laugh. Make sure you have some privacy for reading, lest you cause concern, remarks on your cackles and gusts of laughter, or frantic calls for the men in the white coats. After that, in Robin Williams' immortal words, "Y' on y'own. Good night."
Rating: Summary: Great start--funny with a twist--but doesn't quite finish Review: THE PHILOSOPHICAL STRANGLER starts off hot--with a great combination of adventure and humor. Grayboar, a strangler with an inclination to philosophy, and his business manager Ignace, have a good thing going. There's no lack of customers and Ignace hoards every penny he can. So long as they can stay away from politics and religion, they've got it made. A philosophical strangler is inherently funny and author Eric Flint's writing, humorous insights, and throw aways (e.g., Grayboar's girlfriend is Schrodenger's Cat) will keep you laughing Naturally, they can't quite follow Ignace's rules. Ignace (the narrator)loses the argument to Grayboar's philosophy and the two end up plunged deep into both politics and especially religion. The second half of this novel becomes a much more predictable adventure story. I was disappointed to find that Grayboar's philosophy somehow got lost. Although Ignace stayed consistent (and consistently funny), the second half felt as if it was running short a cylinder. I enjoyed this book and feel no shame in recommending it. Unfortunately, it fell slightly short of the promise offered in the first half.
|