Rating: 
Summary: What An Idiot...
Review: The level of hatred towards Bill Clinton on the part of stiff-upper lip conservatives (i.e., Ann Coulter et al) still amazes me--all that I can say is: get over it!!! Face it: Clinton was so successful and cunning that his relatively unsavvy conservative counterparts couldn't help but spew invective at every turn. Clinton did indeed make many mistakes, but those minor actions in no way justified his impeachment (which was all a show by ignorant conservative Congressmen). If you are looking for an evil and incompetent at George W. Bush: a self-righteous "religious" man who has led his country into infinite war and intolerance and whose father was once an investment partner of the Bin Laden family! Clinton was one of the best presidents of the second half of the twentieth century, a man who maintained perennial prosperity and peace; the same can't be said for George "What Should I Do Now That I've Screwed Everything Up" Bush, who's one of the absolute worst.
Rating:
Summary: Ann Ann Ann
Review: Ann Coulter's 15 minutes were up a long time ago. The author should be one of the targets for the war on terror. Bill Clinton is certainly no saint, but when you look at what sits in the Oval Office today, it certainly puts Bill Clinton's transgressions into their proper perspective. And I can guarantee that if Bill Clinton had failed to file documents with the SEC after selling off his shares of stock in the oil company he was with, the man would have been put in prison. Such double standards. As you can see, I have a great number of issues with George Bush and I could write a book in the same vein that Ann Coulter wrote about Bill Clinton and it would be just as good. Maybe even better. Plus, I too am a tall bonde woman with a law degree. Come to think of it, I think I will start exaggerating my book right now. Sorry. Gotta go!
Rating:
Summary: Another psychotic ramble
Review: Listen to Ann Coulter talk and you wonder why she isn't taking her medication. Buy one of her books and you've just joined a pschotic nut group.Ann Coulter must be irritated because she could never get Clinton alone. Or maybe it's just that she keeps writing this insane screeds because there's a hard core of nuts who will buy anything that vents their anger. Not worth one star and a waste of money.
Rating:
Summary: Psychotic blonde seeks attention!
Review: Get this. It's not in large type to make it easier to read. It's because it's utterly stupid. But the money to made is made by pandering to angry dysfunctional people. And they do have trouble reading.
Rating:
Summary: Ann isn't a bed of Flowers!
Review: The prose of this product is comparable to a highschool term paper. It comes off written by a spiteful schoolgirl, ignored by her love interest. Could it be perhaps Clinton spurned Ann's advances? Who knows. I guess Ann dislikes smart,attractive,& successful men from Arkansas. Especially those that bring America 8 years of prosperity. This book is for the Bash A Prosperous Democratic Led America Crowd.
Rating:
Summary: Oh, puh-lease.
Review: Even if you're the most die-hard Republican, you may find Coulter's off-the-reservation ponitifications hard to take. Is she serious when she suggests that the United States invade Muslim countries and forcibly convert them to Christianity, or is she just creating controversy to keep her name in the press? Does it matter? Do everyone on both sides of the political aisle a favor and allow Ms. Coulter to fade into fringe obscurity with the other reactionary nutbags.
Rating: 
Summary: Astounding work
Review: I really don't see how even liberals can argue with plain fact (but, they do). Ann Coulter ALWAYS backs her statements with research. She makes none of this up. Does she despise the 'sniffing pantywaist' liberals? Yes, she does and - the vast majority of Americans agree with her. You folks just keep attacking her, my President and my country. After all, it's all you know.
Rating:
Summary: Is she serious? Is she institutionalized yet?
Review: Coulter's book isn't worth a review. Skip it; read something by someone who's less crazed.
Rating:
Summary: The Liberal
Review: The liberal is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a liberal and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: "I've been found out." One cannot defend himself against the liberal. He attacks with lightening speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any attempt at defense. Quickly he turns the attacker's charges back on him, and the attacker becomes the liar, the troublemaker, the terrorist. Nothing could be more mistaken than to defend oneself. That is just what the liberal wants. He can invent a new lie every day for the enemy to respond to, and the result is that the enemy spends so much time defending himself that he has no time to do what the liberal really fears: to attack. The accused has become the accuser, and loudly he shoves the accuser into the dock. So it always was in the past when a person or a movement fought the liberals. That is what would happen to us as well were we not fully aware of his nature, and if we lacked the courage to draw the following radical conclusions: 1. One cannot fight the liberal by positive means. He is a negative, and this negative must be erased from the American system, or he will forever corrupt it. 2. One cannot discuss the liberalism question with the liberals. One can hardly prove to a person that one has the duty to render him harmless. 3. One cannot allow the liberal the same means one would give an honest opponent, for he is no honorable opponent. He will use generosity and nobility only to trap his enemy. 4. The liberal has nothing to say about American questions. He is a foreigner, an alien, who only enjoys the rights of a guest, rights that he always abuses. 5. The so-called constitutional morality of the liberal is no morality at all, rather an encouragement to betrayal. Therefore, they have no claim to protection from the state. 6. The liberal is not smarter than we are, rather only cleverer and craftier. His system cannot be defeated economically-he follows entirely different moral principles than we do. It can only be broken through political means. 7. A liberal cannot insult a Republican. liberal slanders are but badges of honor for a Republican opponent of the liberals. 8. The more an American person or a American movement opposes the liberal, the more valuable it is. If someone is attacked by the liberals, that is a sure sign of his virtue. He who is not persecuted by the liberals, or who is praised by them, is useless and dangerous. 9. The liberal evaluates American questions from the liberal standpoint. As a result, the opposite of what he says must be true. 10. One must either affirm or reject anti-liberalism. He who defends the liberals harms his own people. One can only be a liberal lackey or a liberal opponent. Opposing the liberal is a matter of personal hygiene.
These principles give the conservative movement a chance of success. Only such a movement will be taken seriously by the liberals, only such a movement will be feared by them. The fact that he shouts and complains about such a movement therefore is only a sign that it is right. We are therefore delighted that we are constantly attacked in the liberal gazettes. They may shout about terror. We answer with Ashcroft's familiar words: "Terror? Never! It is social hygiene. We take these individuals out of circulation just as a doctor does to a bacterium.
Rating:
Summary: What is she talking about?
Review: Ann proves that you can't take a personal hatred for someone and make it into a book that is readable or worth reading. I wonder if her research extended beyond her own imagination?
| 
