<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: A big improvement over last year's design
Review: Last year I wrote a review on the Stardate calendar and complained about how small the dates were and how the entire calendar focussed more on the terrible "Enterprise" series rather than the Star Trek franchise as a whole. Last year's calendar didn't even include any images from any of the TEN feature films.I am proud to say that this year's calendar is a marked improvement over last year's! The dates are larger and in a bolder font. All five series are represented and all ten films are included as well. The pictures are indeed small compared to previous releases as mentioned by another reviewer, but the variety of images this year makes up for the lack of size. Highly recommended to any true Trek fan who understands it is a STAR TREK calendar...not a year-long publicity photo shoot for an inferior "Enterprise" series.
Rating:
Summary: A big improvement over last year's design
Review: Last year I wrote a review on the Stardate calendar and complained about how small the dates were and how the entire calendar focussed more on the terrible "Enterprise" series rather than the Star Trek franchise as a whole. Last year's calendar didn't even include any images from any of the TEN feature films. I am proud to say that this year's calendar is a marked improvement over last year's! The dates are larger and in a bolder font. All five series are represented and all ten films are included as well. The pictures are indeed small compared to previous releases as mentioned by another reviewer, but the variety of images this year makes up for the lack of size. Highly recommended to any true Trek fan who understands it is a STAR TREK calendar...not a year-long publicity photo shoot for an inferior "Enterprise" series.
Rating:
Summary: Good Pictures but needs a design makeover
Review: While I liked the pictures selected for this calender; it seems that they seem to get smaller each year. Couldn't something creative be done with the backgrounds of each entry? I don't see how shrinking the photos to the size of a postage stamp will enhance the quality. In earlier years the pics were much larger. One could say you must have space to write in the calender. However the same design is present each year with no change.
Rating:
Summary: Good Pictures but needs a design makeover
Review: While I liked the pictures selected for this calender; it seems that they seem to get smaller each year. Couldn't something creative be done with the backgrounds of each entry? I don't see how shrinking the photos to the size of a postage stamp will enhance the quality. In earlier years the pics were much larger. One could say you must have space to write in the calender. However the same design is present each year with no change.
<< 1 >>
| 
