The First Virtue (Star Trek The Next Generation: Double Helix, Book 56)

Rating:
Summary: No that great especially for a mini series.
Review: Bad conclusion to wrap up this whole double helix thing. Found the book rather slow and couldn't finish it. Really did not have much that kept you holding. I am good friends with mike friedman and he told me that Christie hogged most of the writing and that was why it was poor.

Rating:
Summary: Not particularily empressive
Review: I cannot help but think that this book is ridiculously boring. I did not care at all about characters (except perhaps that of some terrorists). And as explinations for the plants of galaxy-wide genocide go, this one is rather feeble.

Rating:
Summary: Not particularily empressive
Review: I cannot help but think that this book is ridiculously boring. I did not care at all about characters (except perhaps that of some terrorists). And as explinations for the plants of galaxy-wide genocide go, this one is rather feeble.

Rating:
Summary: Terrible Conclusion!
Review: I thought this book made a discrace of the Double Helix series! Nothing compelled me to actually finish it. I stopped around page 100 for a while and then finished it. Soon after that I forgot about it. I thought that having it take place 20 or so years before all of the other books was strange. If I were writing a conclusion, I would have at least have set it after Double or Nothing by Peter David (which was very good!). They might as well just have made Peter David's Double or Nothing the conclusion!

Rating:
Summary: Terrible Conclusion!
Review: I thought this book made a discrace of the Double Helix series! Nothing compelled me to actually finish it. I stopped around page 100 for a while and then finished it. Soon after that I forgot about it. I thought that having it take place 20 or so years before all of the other books was strange. If I were writing a conclusion, I would have at least have set it after Double or Nothing by Peter David (which was very good!). They might as well just have made Peter David's Double or Nothing the conclusion!

Rating:
Summary: Classic Friedman!!
Review: If you have read any of the Star Trek books written by Michael Jan Friedman you know how good his work is. This book is no different. It finishes the "Double Helix" set perfectly!

Rating:
Summary: Classic Friedman!!
Review: If you have read any of the Star Trek books written by Michael Jan Friedman you know how good his work is. This book is no different. It finishes the "Double Helix" set perfectly!

Rating:
Summary: Classic Friedman!!
Review: If you have read any of the Star Trek books written by Michael Jan Friedman you know how good his work is. This book is no different. It finishes the "Double Helix" set perfectly!

Rating:
Summary: Plot problems (3 stars so far)
Review: It may be a bit premature for me to give a review of this book, but I think it needs to be reviewed somewhere in the first fifty or so pages. I haven't finished it yet, but I found the conversation Jack Crusher has with Tuvok a bit disturbing when they talk about having families aboard ship. Jack talks about the Stargazer separating into two parts in case enemies are lurking about. However, in Friedman's Reunion from 1990, it is mentioned that the Stargazer can't separate like the Enterprise. Why is Michael Jan Friedman contradicting one of his own books?

Rating:
Summary: Plot problems (3 stars so far)
Review: It may be a bit premature for me to give a review of this book, but I think it needs to be reviewed somewhere in the first fifty or so pages. I haven't finished it yet, but I found the conversation Jack Crusher has with Tuvok a bit disturbing when they talk about having families aboard ship. Jack talks about the Stargazer separating into two parts in case enemies are lurking about. However, in Friedman's Reunion from 1990, it is mentioned that the Stargazer can't separate like the Enterprise. Why is Michael Jan Friedman contradicting one of his own books?