<< 1 >>
Rating: Summary: Interesting historical review of the gene concept Review: An excellent introduction to its subject. The book provides a clear explanation of the idea of the gene and how genes "work". I particularly like the focus on the history of genetics, showing how the research inspired by the fruitful idea of the 'gene' leads us to the conclusion that the very concept has outlived its time. The importance of issues involving genetics--biotechnology, explanations of 'genetic' differences among people, patents on life forms, etc.--require the average citizen to make a little effort to understand the science involved. This book provides a good introduction to those issues and to some of the complexities. For example, if genes don't exist, then what are private companies trying to patent? The book is a short, accessible window on some of these questions.
Rating: Summary: What is a gene, anyway? Review: An excellent introduction to its subject. The book provides a clear explanation of the idea of the gene and how genes "work". I particularly like the focus on the history of genetics, showing how the research inspired by the fruitful idea of the 'gene' leads us to the conclusion that the very concept has outlived its time. The importance of issues involving genetics--biotechnology, explanations of 'genetic' differences among people, patents on life forms, etc.--require the average citizen to make a little effort to understand the science involved. This book provides a good introduction to those issues and to some of the complexities. For example, if genes don't exist, then what are private companies trying to patent? The book is a short, accessible window on some of these questions.
Rating: Summary: Beyond the Gene Myth Review: An interesting capsule view of the history of genetics and a penetrating discussion of the gene myth as it emerged, persisted, and then foundered in a more complex reality. The exploding field of genomics, and bioinformatics has left our perceptions a decade behind, and we are only beginning to 'come to' and realize we are in a different world of biology. Gene regulation, and the evolution of evolvability have to a large extent confounded one aspect of the standard Darwinian view, and we are confronted by a new bio-computational reality that leaves even our sense of the computer on the junk heap of primitive machines. A good reality check but the passage into the new worlds of DNA should induce courage to state the obvious inadequacy of Darwin's natural selection. Darwin seems incongruous at this point.
Rating: Summary: Gene Grinch Review: Here we have a brief history of events such as Mendel's laws, Watson and Crick's description of DNA structure and the reading of the draft of the human genome. These events define the 20th century as THE CENTURY OF THE GENE. Beyond that this book is distinctly mean with it's praise. The book is less history and more lecture; and largely directed at the scientific community itself. The author admonishes biologists for their "gene talk" and wants the discussion to be more structured, reasoned, and realistic. She takes the role of the gene Grinch when she steals the thunder of all the recent popular talk about the wonders of the gene by saying that "the gene is not a physical object" and there needs to be more "acknowledgement of how large a gap between genetic 'information' and biological meaning [there] really is". It is in making this point to her colleagues that we the lay reader, lose her, and then lose interest.THE CENTURY OF THE GENE gets fairly technical and it remains on a narrow focus - the usefulness and validity of the "gene talk" favored by many popular science writers. Books such as TABOO and GENOME, where genes are "linked" or "tied" to some human attribute, would therefore not be on this author's recommended reading list. That's fine for Ms Fox Keller's standing within the scientific community, but if she wishes to bring to the attention of the wider reading audience her genuine concerns with these popular science books, there is one thing she should have taken from them. They are called "popular" because of style and readability. Unfortunately for THE CENTURY OF THE GENE, the same can not be said.
Rating: Summary: Rethinking the Dominance of Genes Review: It is quite telling that shortly after this book's release, the scientific community was humbled by the relevation that the human genome is made up of about 1/3 the number of genes previously thought. Keller deconstructs the very notion of a thing called a gene, and instead presents to us a molecular world where vast networks of processs interact to produce the phenomena convenionally attributed to genes. Even better, she presents her critique within a historical context that allows the reader to see how the current myopic model of gene primacy came to be, and how information conflicting with that model has very gradually moved from the periphery toward the center of mainstream genetics research. Overall, I found the book to be well-written and sobering with respect to the parade of biological and behavioral attributes and conditions attributed to these things called genes.
Rating: Summary: Interesting historical review of the gene concept Review: This is a very concise and readable historical review of the gene concept from its origins in the nineteenth century to the live debate which is taking place now due to some fascinating work done by cutting edge contemporary researchers. Keller is an excellent writer and a thought provoking thinker. Her analysis is thorough but easily accessible by anyone with a high school knowledge of the biological sciences. It's not ground breaking philosophy of science but it's a refreshing change from the kind of superficial analysis of this trendy issue provided by the mass media. An excellent weekend read for the thirsty mind.
<< 1 >>
|