<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: dysplastic nevus
Review: Dr. Ackerman once again has produced a excellent review of a very important topic in medicine. Those cosidering the purchase of DYSPLASTIC nevus most likely will be dermatologists,pathologists and physicians who have a special intetest in nevi and malignant melanoma. This comprehensive text compiles all of the currently available pathology and scientific understanding about one of the most challenging conditions in pathology.Dr. Ackerman's review is complete, easy to read and will be a very important reference to those who are interested in the current thinking about Dysplastic Nevi. I highly recommend this book. Marvin Pietruszka,M.D.
Rating:
Summary: A book for anyone interested in melanocytic proliferations.
Review: Since 1978, when Dr. Clark published his paper on the "B-K Mole Syndrome", this has been one of the most highly charged topics in the field of dermatopathology. Dr. Ackerman and colleagues slice through this topic with such ease that it makes one pause to ask why there was ever such a controversy. However, there still is considerable controversy about this topic throughout the dermatology community. If, however, more pathologists, dermatopathologists, and dermatologists would read this book and understand the premises the authors examine, it would clear up immediately so many of the so-called "issues" about these benign neoplasms that the controversy would go quietly into the night and be heard from no longer. This book is not only interesting from a historical perspective, but it also examines every major issue surrounding these lesions.Mark A. Hurt, MD
Rating:
Summary: A book for anyone interested in melanocytic proliferations.
Review: Since 1978, when Dr. Clark published his paper on the "B-K Mole Syndrome", this has been one of the most highly charged topics in the field of dermatopathology. Dr. Ackerman and colleagues slice through this topic with such ease that it makes one pause to ask why there was ever such a controversy. However, there still is considerable controversy about this topic throughout the dermatology community. If, however, more pathologists, dermatopathologists, and dermatologists would read this book and understand the premises the authors examine, it would clear up immediately so many of the so-called "issues" about these benign neoplasms that the controversy would go quietly into the night and be heard from no longer. This book is not only interesting from a historical perspective, but it also examines every major issue surrounding these lesions. Mark A. Hurt, MD
<< 1 >>
| 
