Rating: 
Summary: MONTAUK EXPERIMENT LIVES
Review: THIS BOOK WAS GREAT. IT GOES INTO GREAT DETAIL ABOUT THE PHILADELPHIA EXPERIMENT. IT FOLLOWS THE MOVIE WELL & AFTER READING THE PHILADELPHIA EXPERIMENT BY CHARLES BERLITZ & WILLIAM MOORE. IT IS A DEFINITE YES ON MY LIST!
Rating:
Summary: THE MONTAUK PROJECT: EXPERIMENTS IN TIME
Review: THIS BOOK WAS VERY INFORMATIVE AND A GREAT COMPANION TO THE MOVIE DONE IN 1983 WITH MICHAEL PARE TITLED "THE PHILADELPHIA EXPERIMENT." IT IS ALSO A GREAT COMPANION TO THE BOOK DONE BY WILLIAM L. MOORE & CHARLES BERLITZ RE: THIS "EXPERIMENT." THIS BOOK WAS GREAT!!! ONCE READING IT, YOU WILL STRIVE FOR OTHERS ON THIS SUBJECT. DO CHECK OUT THE OTHER BOOKS BY THE SAME AUTHOR. I HAVE NOT READ ALL OF THEM YET...BUT THIS ONE SEEMS TO BE THE BEST SO FAR.
Rating: 
Summary: I'd go back in time to not have read Montauk
Review: This book, like the rest in Moon's Montauk series, is absolutely horrible. Let's put aside the fact that the book is just embarrassing from a literary point of view. If Moon needed an editor, or a ghost writer, he ought to have hired one. Instead, he settled for the publication of a book written well below the fifth-grade reading level (minus various outbursts of technobable, indecipherable even to legitimate scientists). At the start, the reader is warned of the presence of "soft facts", but one still doesn't expect that the entire premise, actually the entire book--cover to cover, will be 100% unsubstantiated. About the only thing that can actually be proven is the location of the base. Further degrading the plausibility of the story is that Moon (or the illustrious Preston Nichols) attempts to weave EVERY form of paranormal phenomenan into the tale. Do yourself a favor and don't buy this book. You'll just upset yourself. Actually, do yourself a favor and don't even read it.
Rating:
Summary: Talk about THOUGHT PROVOKING!
Review: WOW! Preston B. Nichols explains his awakening to the fact that he was involved in the manipulation of history through time travel. I know... it sounds a bit odd, but once you have read his story (this is a non-fiction book), you start contemplating the ramifications of time travel. So here is one of my questions: If you can go back in time using the times of August 12th 1943, 1963 and 1983, does that mean the the next massive entry to manipulate time is in 2003? If not, then are there folks in a circuitous rut of constantly manipulating 1943, 1963, and 1983 and the tunnel times connected to these moments? These are just some of things that will start you thinking after reading this. I highly recommend this book if only for the intellectual exercise of running through the possibilities!
| 
