Celestial Lancets: A History and Rationale of Acupuncture and Moxa (Needham Research Institute Series, 1)

Rating:
Summary: Academics & serious students of acupuncture only should buy
Review: After finding out that what is taught in the West as `Traditional Chinese Medicine' was basically created by a Chinese Communist government committee from some but not all of the various ancient texts and practices that are available, I wanted to reconstruct Traditional Chinese Medicine (particularly acupuncture) as it actually existed prior to the Communist revolution. I came across Celestial Lancets in the process. Make no mistake, it is a tome, complete with more footnotes and references than most of us can read in several lifetimes.

"Celestial Lancets" is written by one of the top academic researchers on China, Joseph Needham, in collaboration with his Chinese wife. It is part of his encyclopedic "Science and Civilization in China" series. It is written by a serious academic, for other serious academics or practitioners of acupuncture and moxa who want to explore as deeply as possible the history and understanding of these two ancient practices of Traditional Chinese Medicine. There are no less than three bibliographies broken down by language and dates.

Needham is neither a starry-eyed believer in TCM, nor is he a scientific disbeliever. He simply explores the history to a very great, detailed depth, and then does the same for some of the western science that has been done (this chapter alone being almost 75 pages), letting the evidence show for itself. It should be said that the goal of the book seems to be history and explanation of acupuncture and moxa, not an attempt to PROVE the system to the most skeptic of Westerners.

I like reading academic works, though I don't have even an associates degree, and I still found this book tough going, except for the last chapter on `The Lore of Vital Spots'. This chapter will be of particular interest to serious martial artists (which is how I began my own exploration of things Asian, particularly philosophy). Unless you are serious enough about Traditional Chinese Medicine that you have begun learning the Chinese language, you might want to skip buying this book, and try checking it out from a library first.

It is a very good book for it's purpose, probably ground-breaking in many of it's insights. It is not for beginners like me who are just trying to get an accurate, broad overview with less historical detail. Or just use it as a reference book, rather than reading it cover to cover. Western skeptics of TCM should begin by reading the conclusion on the last two pages, a good idea also for the mildly curious.

The writing style is not challenging, just the pace of the writing for the nonacademic. A better introduction for the layman (again, not the purpose of "Celestial Lancets") would probably be "Web That Has No Weaver: Understanding Chinese Medicine" by Ted Kaptchuk, the second edition.