<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: colouring in of medical history
Review: I am fascinated by this subject, hence the reason for my reading this book, and I happen to be British, hence my appreciation of Richard Gordon's humour. After having read numerous histories of medicine and surgery for both my professional and personal interests, I can honestly say that I was finally able to see many of the famous names as people. I loved the parts about the condom laundry and the fact that we humans, along with cows, are physically responsible for the hole in the ozone layer. Just two examples that spring to mind from this mine of humorously viewed information. Informative and a damn good laugh.
Rating:
Summary: Highly entertaining and interesting.
Review: If you enjoy Jeeves-type British humor and obscure non-fiction (as I do), this book will provide you with many delights. I can see how the "Briticisms" could annoy (I happen to enjoy this stuff), but overall Gordon is a very skillful comic writer, able to highlight the silliness in an anecdote without hitting you over the head with it, and at the same time offering a glimpse of his obviously vast knowledge of medical history.
Regarding content, suffice it to say that Gordon's book stands as further proof that fact is far stranger, more intriguing, and alarming than fiction could ever hope to be.
Rating:
Summary: Highly entertaining and interesting.
Review: If you enjoy Jeeves-type British humor and obscure non-fiction (as I do), this book will provide you with many delights. I can see how the "Briticisms" could annoy (I happen to enjoy this stuff), but overall Gordon is a very skillful comic writer, able to highlight the silliness in an anecdote without hitting you over the head with it, and at the same time offering a glimpse of his obviously vast knowledge of medical history.
Regarding content, suffice it to say that Gordon's book stands as further proof that fact is far stranger, more intriguing, and alarming than fiction could ever hope to be.
Rating:
Summary: Highly entertaining and interesting.
Review: If you enjoy Jeeves-type British humor and obscure non-fiction (as I do), this book will provide you with many delights. I can see how the "Briticisms" could annoy (I happen to enjoy this stuff), but overall Gordon is a very skillful comic writer, able to highlight the silliness in an anecdote without hitting you over the head with it, and at the same time offering a glimpse of his obviously vast knowledge of medical history.
Regarding content, suffice it to say that Gordon's book stands as further proof that fact is far stranger, more intriguing, and alarming than fiction could ever hope to be.
Rating: 
Summary: WANDERING AND HARD TO FOLLOW
Review: Mr. Gordon wanders all around topics that would be interesting if the reader were able to follow his path. He makes frequent abbreviated references to topics that are difficult to follow.This is a hard-to-read book.
Rating: 
Summary: Light and funny, by fermed
Review: Richard Gordon is a physician, a writer and a humorist. His history of medicine is, indeed, alarming. It was not so much what wasn't known that mattered, but what physicians thought they knew and did not. The book is light and quick paced. At times I wished Gordon had quit trying to be funny and had spent a little more time expounding on his massive knowledge of medicine and its history. I am not an expert in this field, but I did make an effort to check some of his facts...and he was right on target. The book is packed with medical trivia and funny gossip (sometimes horrible gossip) about its practitioners. Much of the information is astonishing if not alarming. The book lacks an index, which is infuriating and should be forbidden in these days of computers. It does have a few pages of references. In all I thoroughly enjoyed reading it, and I certainly learned a great deal of new and interesting facts, despite the author's obsession with the quick, witty phrase.
Rating: 
Summary: Horrible
Review: Richard Gordon is very witty. However, this book is poorly written and badly organized. There were also a lot of misspellings and other errors which should of been caught in editing. He wanders all over the place and assumes that you are familiar with the history of medicine. I am not, which is why I bought the book. Don't read this book unless you already know the history of medicine or you enjoy being frustrated.
Rating:
Summary: Horrible
Review: Richard Gordon is very witty. However, this book is poorly written and badly organized. There were also a lot of misspellings and other errors which should of been caught in editing. He wanders all over the place and assumes that you are familiar with the history of medicine. I am not, which is why I bought the book. Don't read this book unless you already know the history of medicine or you enjoy being frustrated.
Rating:
Summary: Riveting yet discombobulated (literally) text
Review: Thumbs up to Gordon for taking the reader of a mesmeric stroll through the oft-unusual characters and events that shaped the history of modern medicine as we know it. My sentiment wasn't initially thus. Half way through the first chapter I slapped the price sticker back on the rear cover, prepared to return it to the bookstore. Luckily (for me), I'm always up for a challenge, and something deep inside urged me to press on. Ah, woe is me; I couldn't put this book down (and this is certainly a text I look forward to rereading!). Perhaps the biggest qualm that I have with this text (and the reason I referred to it as literally discombobulating) is that 30 pages (or 12% of the book) were out of order! After discovering that the "The Gold-headed Cane" wasn't a mere page and a half chapter, but a full 27-pages; I actually had to read backwards! Bad move St. Martin's Press. In short, this is a terrific text for ANYONE interested in learning more about the history of medicine. Gordon's tone is vivid and funny; the pace is fast; the language rich (if your vocabulary/verbal reasoning is slightly above average or below- be prepare to have a dictionary near by). The text also features a couple dozen resourceful illustrations. There are NO misspellings in this text, only differences in British and American Standard English usage (i.e. using an "s" instead of a "z"- organisation vs, organization). - Great book for the mature-minded, well-versed reader. Enjoy!
<< 1 >>
|
