To Please a Lady

Rating:
Summary: A tree died...
Review: Terrible. What has happened to Susan Johnson? This book and Touch of Sin have been simply awful. I am saddened that a tree had to die to print this book. The plot completely unbelievable, and the characters whiney. Don't waste your money and buy these two books.

Rating:
Summary: Hard to fathom
Review: The essence of the story is merely 'to please a lady'. That's it. How...narrow. And it's hard for me to fathom the relationship between an 18-yr-old KID and a mature woman with FIVE kids. And even her oldest child is a few years younger than her lover. Yechhh... The lover could've been her SON. More yechs. The beginning of the story is quite okay. But eventually it drags on and on and on, without any real plot. It's as if Susan is merely trying her best to stick to her title. That's all.

Rating:
Summary: Not as good as usual
Review: The two main characters in this book already knew each other when it wtarted. There were references made to their past together and how he had seduced her before (it was in her previous books). So, basically, they were already in love when the book started. We don't even get to enjoy their falling in love. I normally love her books, but this one fell short of what I have come to expect from Ms. Johnson.

Rating:
Summary: Not as good as usual
Review: The two main characters in this book already knew each other when it wtarted. There were references made to their past together and how he had seduced her before (it was in her previous books). So, basically, they were already in love when the book started. We don't even get to enjoy their falling in love. I normally love her books, but this one fell short of what I have come to expect from Ms. Johnson.

Rating:
Summary: Not impressed
Review: This is the first book by Susan Johnson that I have read and I must say I was not impressed. The history lesson was good but I struggled to finish the story. The main characters were likeable but I was never convinced that them ending up together would be a good thing. I had a very hard time buying into the whole storyline.

Rating:
Summary: Not the best but certainly the least!
Review: This is the worst of SJ book I have ever read. First of all Robbie Carr is too young, at 18 and spoil, selfish and acts like a child all the time, doesn't constitue what a man should be like. Sorry readers but I enjoy romance and love hot steamy sex but this book lacks everything. The only reason I finish this book was because I spend money on it and also I wanted to know more about Elizabeth and Johnnie(Outlaw). If I had to suggest a book it would be Outlaw and that readers you will get your money worth

Rating:
Summary: I liked this book...
Review: This one is for all your prudes who complain about excessive sex in Susan Johnson novels. This one, I will personally vouchsafe, is impeccably clean. I did not quite get what the danger in the book was all about , because Roxanne had to be shut up in some house in the beginning for a very long time. Robbie is more of a whining teenage boy, if that's the type of lover you prefer. Also, Roxanne has kids, which kind of diminished the exciting factor of romance novels. The lead antagonist is Argyll who lusts for Roxanne, but he gets vanished after a few chapters, though it would have been nice if he reappeared to show some consistency. Too clean and too boring

Rating:
Summary: This lady was NOT pleased
Review: This one is for all your prudes who complain about excessive sex in Susan Johnson novels. This one, I will personally vouchsafe, is impeccably clean. I did not quite get what the danger in the book was all about , because Roxanne had to be shut up in some house in the beginning for a very long time. Robbie is more of a whining teenage boy, if that's the type of lover you prefer. Also, Roxanne has kids, which kind of diminished the exciting factor of romance novels. The lead antagonist is Argyll who lusts for Roxanne, but he gets vanished after a few chapters, though it would have been nice if he reappeared to show some consistency. Too clean and too boring