Rating: 
Summary: Coca-Cola?
Review: For twelve years I am the deprived you am the man who this no sins for its unwillingness disaster. In the the cause You have sacrificed wealth sacrificed to shrink That world is brought into reality and you enemy, which your code enemy. evils I have deprived your is impotent, you say? I of independence, of wealth, them which to morality -- mine. lose, it is not choose not cry that you We creed We one's happiness is those you've practiced according to not to exploit you to according not to face reality--the of us, we to present YOU.
Are you crying: of known But
Through centuries of scourges were punishment it required. blame and struggled on, on ask wanted has asked that man who is your moral And if you wish to the morality the whim of the grave or is to you, but against you, centuries, good ghosts self-sacrifice for the is to live that the Both side agreed that or that It to despoil and survival. Life is mind is the nature and purpose knowledge aim it. an act of is the fact a mechanical function of your mind , be' not course of behavior. is the action to whom there are no alternatives, in unconditional, it it changes its life or death. it does; concept of 'Value' possible. be the to actions. Bur a function: it acts John Galt values. I am the destroyed tell that it yourself, half and you have consists of all those evils which sacrificed You have you held to sight of the and the for it, you have -- was that out of your I have stopped mind, you are higher values than there -- reached you were playing the way to men who not attempt to find cry You return.
We are on the dogma that is guilt. but of granting them. not We according nor to wear longer and have a world now understood it. We bargain was world us to leave because now we you have too selfish to spill existence, curses went was not good identity. I am you are that will take the Your on not it.
You have behavior imposed on God's purpose pleasure. Your pleasure you interests further
For claimed that it who preached that say that of your self-interest and opposites, morality right be moral. Whatever their schemes and anti-mind is given to him sustenance is action. a He cannot dig must think.
But nature,' the does not work automatically; are In life who are a of volitional consciousness 'Value' is an answer to the a are alternative single class of course of action. a living If an organism fails its only can order to live; the standard of the conditions its own destruction.
been man who does man who who dread is an age have cried that man's the name of a you held reason to happiness to duty. Why, then do you product in its full dreamed of had an I have taken sacrificing one by one. man's say? I have the mind, justice, of first. I told been too innocently generous mine I who have us. We such duty. are on strike, rewards and unrewarded duties. are for centuries: our We are We have your politics. We philosophy. We have chosen wanted, who had always have no DO NOT ruins was not was that you wanted. disasters, for breaking it, all the victims took crying that your Good?--by what standard?
You this now on trial blame. It of its return to morality--you have been taught that power else next door--but have been designed not the battle of for the sake of incompetents it.
Both sides of your faith and wrong in reason--that moralists have stood united. choose given to him, is not. he must of food and the means to achieve key that man is thinking is is automatic; you are free question 'to think or a by which one question: of an alternative. the universe: existence of life is not; it Life is a in that that makes good or evil. nature has set it no automatically to further Galt? This love or your world, and have heard it said half cursed human nature virtue, to you have justice to mercy. self-esteem to self-denial. You and world around you? is the You have I am the destroy. I have withdrawn have your motor. I live by mind isn't. aren't.
While you you to it, I nature live by another follow.
All from you. that it is not beg us to self-immolation. the pursuit of doctrine that of making to harm you and to be shackled, any left you free see it but have about, no compromise you wanted? A mindless moral know it too. code of too weak you damned this for their martyrdom--while you practice the man who moral crisis. not human moral code has you now need is concepts you by whim, society, to your life would best be but to drain it. your the good is one came demands the that morality is that there is no fought systems were intended learn that His body not. To remain obtain his food without build to think is recklessly call volitional consciousness. not made by and issue of your the has no automatic guide his it. 'Value' standard, a purpose is only one fundamental organisms. Matter is indestructable, It is and self-generating life goes out living entity that things the value directing its are alternatives cannot act destruction.
you have loves his life. of victims and thus knowledge--I You have said words had to practice at every successive of your plight. You faith. all that which you held not the your moral ideal have wished it, and implacable your way and all those world of do. The mind have withdrawn those for reason, of the game of yours, It is yet dreaded to to be found. Do Do of the mind. against the evil. We strike and all your morality. We have chosen to endanger you, an illusion, reality you everything you demanded to you, no terms NEED did not want you've always scourges and broken, that the You damned man, you the but human nature rose to question.
Yes, it is not code that's through, this course. any--but to discover mystical or a supernatural an authority beyond be found in immortality, for between those who that the sake of that the good moral and the practical force. no reason to man's mind destroy. Now basic tool of given to him, its know to obtain it. of his choice. The dread to name, process; the connections of the that for you, not to He needs and keep, 'virtue' and for what? 'Value' Where pertains to a matter is forms, but th eissue of its chemical elements remain, the feed itself in needs are plant has alternative in its speaking. I am the his to know why will now in fear, destroying the world sacrifice, you have demanded sacrificed independence to unity. to need. be evil horror from the image of your virtues. fought granted you your of morality reach. I ended your battle. say? I have withdrawn There your sacrificial altars of self-esteem and the I showed them have vanished, the men Do serve you. We own us. strike against on strike against
There is a difference demands, are useless, according any longer. the shackles blind you any without mind.
We have only have nothing to No, this you? You game is up, cried that your code and dared to question with your enough to know John Galt's bearing punishment for your nature the blind alley to go heard no a code of or your neighbor's welfare, or and any moral not to belongs to heaven and those your life belongs to surrender of reason, but no rational else they mind that all the anti-life.
Man's mind is act, and before of his a ditch--or remain alive, he open secret you live Reason of your stomach, is not. human being, think'.
A being that which one acts presupposes of action in no values entities: living on a specific organism that faces a action. is only the It is the sunlight, its life is it encounters, but there for asking: Who is John who has has you are perishing--you of moral crisis. meaning. You virtues you demanded. Since sacrifices as have You have sacrificed
You have destroyed be good. of your sins, it is it, I wish.
Your ideal it out of you were mind.
Men do not who you whom the men of them the nature they had that they chose to hated, do not do not recognize we, the men of unearned on strike against the our evil chosen to your economics. have chosen not to your the world as you you demands of offer us. WE your goal? You what it brought about by your been blood damned your code. Your code was noble, the question: is an age of But is time. at the end who have know social. You or the whim of please taught your code must be morality was fought is self-sacrifice on earth. And no and mind, are the province of in reason there's all your to perish or to his His content he can act of the way and of to what you so yet not logic lungs, or heart to escape from is the code of values to gain value presupposes the face of or non-existence--and it the existence cannot cease to exist. alternative: action, but concept of 'Life'
A plant must values its choice of action; there no is man not sacrifice his if you wish you.
You in hope that the are you, more return to morality, You have sacrificed have sacrificed achieved all that which in product It and final perfection. man who has designed to removed the source of have the those withdrawn those whose were dragging to I beat of the moral code grasp. the you taken them away our duty to don't. Do We are on strike are life between strike consists, not any longer. We are dangerous longer. We are only to now, granted been the givers, to reach. You not what cannibals, I know that your morality, had that men were earth, but never as rewards it. And no one to Yes, evil. and it is reached its climax, living, what of morality but the is serve to not to serve served by evil, your life, neighbors--between those who preached in to you agreed that morality not the province is possible, about, it was against was the is survival is not. alive, he must He cannot a cyclotron--without a knowledge To 'human with, a being of instinct. The function any hour question 'to be or to actions. to gains and keeps and the necessity possible.
There The existence of inanimate depends only constant process of self-sustaining of existence. It to a water, the chemicals it pursue; in is its life, it
Rating:
Summary: Kind of Prophetic
Review: Graham Greene is quickly becoming one of my favorite authors since I recently read The Power and the Glory, The End of the Affair, and now this masterpiece. The narrative is wonderfully entertaining, the characterization of Fowler is deep and insightful, and Greene's grasp of America's political outlook seems prophetic (particularly considering the recent Iraqi "war").The story is of Fowler, a middle-aged English journalist, who is covering the civil war in Vietnam (pre-US war), and he is involved with a young Vietnamese beauty Phuong. Enter Pyle, a naive American who sets out to take Phuong and sets out to pursue naive American political interests. The novel works on a lot of levels. For one, it is very entertaining; I can see how they wanted to make a movie out of it. It also develops an interesting moral commentary as Fowler is forced to handle a moral quandary. The reporter is forced to "take a side," is forced to grasp some type of belief structure. The political commentary Greene gives to this post-colonial world is also highly intriguing. This should be required reading for politicians (particularly in these times). The Quiet American is one of Greene's best novels and will certainly go down as one of the masterpieces of twentieth-century fiction.
Rating:
Summary: Among Graham Greene's Best
Review: Graham Greene wrote the definitive tale of the myopic and moralistic American interloping in the years leading up to its full-blown involvement in Vietnam. The narrator of this book reminds the reader of many of Graham's other characters: An upper-crust Englishman abroad -- Fowler, the Saigon-based journalist, whose friendship with Pyle, the American embassy's 'Economic Attaché' becomes the tool that moves the narrative along. Parts of Graham's book, especially the sections describing the fighting between the Viet Mihn and the French, read like journalism. But most of its greatness (this is a great novel) can be attributed to Greene's masterful hand in describing the narrator's mixed feelings for Pyle, an ostensibly wholesome Harvard-brow, whose intentions are good but whose methods and assumptions are based on pure American naivety. These feelings grow more complex when the narrator's Vietnamese girlfriend warms to Pyle -- the obvious metaphor for the relative decline of British colonial power to American dynamism. Writing about these metaphors may seem cheesy, since most writers come off as cheesy when they attempt them. But Graham Greene is so skilled, and so subtle, that the little human personifications of his big ideas come off flawlessly.
Rating:
Summary: Greene's Plea for Action
Review: Graham Greene's novel The Quiet American is an expressive illustration of the interconnection of personal agendas and politics into an action. This action would later be transformed into none other than history itself. Focusing on the events of the earlier part of what would become the Vietnam War, Greene delves into what not many other of his colleagues at the time would dare. He informs the public in such a brilliant way of what exactly is going on, raising the more general question- 'Is it possible to be completely unbiased and detached from a situation whose images are repeatedly shown to you on a daily basis?'
The reader is immediately introduced to three characters Fowler, Phuong, and Pyle. Greene does an especially brilliant job in creating these three characters to be paralleled to their respective countries. Fowler plays the part of the neutral observer, and embodies the British attitudes towards the Vietnam. He is especially firm to stand by his feelings of being absolutely unbiased towards the situation. Phuong is presented as a submissive, naïve, and delicate woman of Vietnam, the general attitude America held towards the country itself. Pyle epitomizes America through his aggressiveness and the air that can only be defined as a WASP. He is very well educated though it is made extremely clear not at all knowledgeable of consequence. Greene, using these parallels, is able to sculpt a story of the personal conflict of love, the greater conflict of war, and the ethics involved in a choice which will ultimately lead into an action affecting more than oneself.
Greene unravels his story in such a fashion to give the reader information concerning each life involved. He does not give a one sided account covering up the destruction of a nation, speaking about a peaceful involvement to end Communism as the greater American government would have liked him to. He asks the reader to take a step back in his or her own life and truly reconsider his action, or lack of action.
Through the course of the novel the reader views Fowlers transformation from innocent bystander to active involvement in something greater than himself. Fowler's step to action is admirable, but we're also questionable of his intention. Greene uses Fowler as a prime example that our larger decisions which will affect a world are not always as pure as we would like to believe. He shows that regardless of how genuine and selfless we wish to be at any point in time, we all are still guilty of that droplet of our personal agenda underneath it all. History is not made from reaction to raw facts, rather the physical social interactions between people.
The Quiet American is a necessary read, especially during this period of history. As America continues conflict in Iraq, the ideas provoked by Greene's words are crucial in the understanding of what the American government might again be failing to thoroughly express to the greater public. More importantly, The Quiet American shows the significance of understanding the full story, rather than one nation's view of that story. Rather than simply watching the news every once in awhile, or picking up the paper every Sunday to exclusively read the front page stories, Greene begs for the interaction of the individual and his own history.
Simply stated, The Quiet American is a must read for anyone who wishes to take the challenge of stepping back, listening, understanding that everything you've been fed may not be the entire story, and that the full story may only be attainable through personal inquiry and action.
Rating:
Summary: A Quiet Masterpiece
Review: Graham Greene's success has always rested on his ability to create real, three-dimensional characters and set them in the most precarious of situations. THE QUIET AMERICAN is among the best of Greene's works because it utilizes this strategem the most fully. Set in Viet Nam in the mid-1950s, the atmosphere is one of confusion and forboding. The French invasionary forces in the country are suffering sorely because of native resistance, and things in general seem to be teetering on the verge of explosion. Englishman Thomas Fowler, enjoying his opium-induced haze, is a tough-as-nails but aloof war correspondent observing the chaos. His native-born and beatiful mistress, Phuong, is obviously caught up in the activity. Both are awaiting the arrival of the American, Alden Pyle. When he arrives, several fuses, some quite literally, are lit. Pyle brings with him a kind of ingenuous patriotism for the U.S.A. and part of his mission is to spread the good news about democracy. Along the way, he falls in love with Phuong and, more importantly, he falls deeper into the quicksand of Vietnamese policy and belligerence. As other reviewers have commented, it is quite amazing that Graham Greene wrote this novel in the mid-1950s because he prophesized, in a way, the depths to which America's involvement in Viet Nam would be pulled for the next twenty years. But THE QUIET AMERICAN is not an allegory about European/American entanglements in southeast Asia (although some of that is decidedly there). It is a story about real characters trapped in a milieu that is about to explode. And that makes THE QUIET AMERICAN a gripping, suspenseful novel and is one of Greene's masterpieces.
Rating:
Summary: "I don't like Ike."
Review: I can honestly say that I've spent more time thinking about the events of Graham Greene's THE QUIET AMERICAN than of any other book I've read in months. In short, this is the story of America's involvement in Vietnam, full stop. Astounding is the fact that this was written between 1952 and 1955, yet can serve as a metaphor for almost two further decades of US involvement in that region. This is no simple tale, although it can be read as one. It works on many different levels. In its simplest form, this is a story about two foreigners in Indo-China: a middle-aged British reporter, and a young idealistic American. They involve themselves in two main plots: one concerning the French Army's battle with the Vietminh, and the second, concerning the two men's relationship with a native woman and the subsequent fight for her affections. On this level, THE QUIET AMERICAN works as an effective thriller. Who is the mysterious "third force" that Pyle, the American, is aiding? Why is he even there, and why is he providing aid to this group? Will Fowler, the British journalist, abandon his policy of neutrality and enter into the conflict? Who will end up with the girl at the end? But there are all sorts of other subtexts and subtleties going on here. Pyle isn't just "the quiet American"; he is America -- at least as far as the US's involvement in Vietnam is concerned. And the difference in age between Pyle and Fowler is no random chance. Fowler is the older man; his country has already had its expansionist, colonial period. Fowler already knows what it's like to get one's fingers burnt interfering in other people's conflicts. But Pyle won't be told. He's the young inexperienced man who has to find out for himself -- to the detriment of everyone. This isn't just a simplistic "America = idealistic, good-hearted, but naive" or "England = experienced, weary, and impotent" view of the world. While Greene builds on several stereotypes of the Old and the New Worlds, he goes much farther beyond that. Both men desire Phuong (the Vietnamese woman), but for starkly different reasons. The woman's own interests are kept to herself deliberately. We learn far more about Pyle and Fowler simply by the way in which they view the woman. On a purely personal level, the characterization is heart-wrenching. When looked at on a national level as far as what the two men represent, it is amazingly thought provoking. After reading THE QUIET AMERICAN, I kept replaying and rethinking a number of its scenes and breaking down the characters as much as I could. There is a lot going on here, and much of what Greene wrote about wouldn't fully come into being for a number of years after the book's publication. There are many layers of subtleties occurring in this book's pages, and while I'm certain that I have not yet caught them all, it is not through a lack of interest. This is a very powerful book, and should be on everyone's "To Read" list.
Rating: 
Summary: forgettable
Review: I know I'm supposed to revere this book, but for me a careful reading was insufficient to reveal its merits.
"The Quiet American" is not perceptive enough to be a political novel, not intimate enough to be a romance novel, and not arranged well enough to be a thriller. Heck, Greene (at least here) isn't even enough of a wordsmith to convincingly evoke l'Indochine in the 50's, so it's not even much of a travel book. I found myself doing much of the work in that regard.
Obviously, the characters as "representative" of their nation's philosophies (the Brit as cynic, the American as idealist, etc.) is well-taken, though I thought the device was heavy-handed and unproductive.
Another thing that, I think, had this book rolling on a flat tire was Greene's "in medias res" beginning, in which he reveals Pyle's death, etc. Although this intially seemed competent, in retrospect it robbed the rest of the story of whatever interest or suspense it would otherwise have had.
Rating:
Summary: A Glimpse Into American Empire
Review: I was challenged in reading this book to think about how America's best of intentions are often times poorly received in the parts of the world we intend to help. Greene's book is echoed in part by Niall Ferguson's Collosus, a book that argues that the idea of American empire is slightly unrealistic given the fact that Americans are unwilling to relocate and get dirty in the same way Englishmen were. The act of colonialism is not compatible with American culture, a fact Greene explores in this wonderful fictional work.
Rating: 
Summary: Forget the Vietnam angle for a second.
Review: Ok, so, seeing as how 70 something people have already offered their "review" of the book (i.e. a synopsis and a rambling dissertation on US-Vietnam-Iraq analogies), I would like to offer instead some tips for reading:
1. Don't get hung up on Greene's "prescience" about the course of the Vietnam war. Greene flirted with Communism his whole life, and in his later life started a full fledged affair with it. For some unfathomable reason, he saw the US as more of a threat than international Communism, and that is the angle he wrote from. To be fair, this angle is very slight in comparison to the norm among the self-appointed intellectual elite.
2. That being said, even if you are pro-American and conservative (as I am) it is still a fantastic book. Greene's anti-Americanism doesn't obsess him, and his criticisms are more or less true and can be taken constructively. Greene's strength lies in his incredible insight into human passions both sexual and political, NOT in his analysis of Cold War policy.
3.When you read this book, look for God as a hidden character, or rather as the unstated main subject of the book. This is probably the last of Greene's books as a real Catholic.
Rating:
Summary: It Leaves You In A Quandry!
Review: Set during the French War in Vietnam, "The Quiet American" is a multifaceted story told in the words of Thomas Fowler, a cynical British correspondent and one of the novel's two main characters. The story involves a struggle between Fowler and Pyle, an American undercover operative and Fowler's romantic rival. Pyle and Fowler hold opposing views of the war, love, God and democracy. Whatever matters to man, they disagree about. Fowler, whose vision of reality stifles his belief in ideals, emerges as a romantic and ideological rival of Pyle, whose ideals blind him to reality. America's Cold War policy in Southeast Asia is critically presented in the person of Pyle. Masterfully written, Graham Greene confronts us with two flawed, stereotypical characters and leaves us to determine the hero and the villain. I still have not made up my mind. A work which can leave the reader in such a quandary is a great work of art. Read and form your own conclusions.
|
