Home :: Books :: Romance  

Arts & Photography
Audio CDs
Audiocassettes
Biographies & Memoirs
Business & Investing
Children's Books
Christianity
Comics & Graphic Novels
Computers & Internet
Cooking, Food & Wine
Entertainment
Gay & Lesbian
Health, Mind & Body
History
Home & Garden
Horror
Literature & Fiction
Mystery & Thrillers
Nonfiction
Outdoors & Nature
Parenting & Families
Professional & Technical
Reference
Religion & Spirituality
Romance

Science
Science Fiction & Fantasy
Sports
Teens
Travel
Women's Fiction
After the Kiss

After the Kiss

List Price: $7.50
Your Price: $6.75
Product Info Reviews

<< 1 2 >>

Rating: 3 stars
Summary: Not all that bad if you forget the details
Review: The story, once you get over the errors and the inaccuracies, is not all that bad. I found the relationship between Julian and Eliza touching and their friendship very real and down to earth. The first part of the book is quite enchanting.

The relationship between Eliza and Marcus is odd to say the least. Why would a person who is so badly scarred emotionally and physically force a woman to marry him? Why resist her so much if he wants her that badly? Why does she agree to it all? What is the secret she is hiding?

There are many things wrong with this book, but it does compel you to finish it! Despite the inaccuracies that will frustrate and irritate you... You still find yourself turning page after page, so... there must be something in it to merit a good rating!!

Rating: 2 stars
Summary: Interesting take on Beauty and the Beast, but...
Review: this book uses plot tricks that are completely ahistorical. I picked it up intrigued by the plot. I found the interaction between the hero and heroine interesting, but not completely compelling. Why? The heroine was in love with another man, whose reluctance to marry her is not well-explained (except very briefly and never to the heroine). The hero's own secrets are also very murky. While I like finding out about the past history of the main characters, I don't like having to drag through the text (not in a romance anyway). And I found all three secrets - why the heroine's parents were estranged from her grandfather, why the heroine's love refused to marry her, and why the hero was so against marriage - all less than compelling. Perhaps the reasons were weak, perhaps they were not well-explained, perhaps both. Finally, while the heroine might be involved in the family scandal, I doubt that a mere disinheritance of the old earl (assuming that such an action was within his power) would cause such a scandal to reverbrate down the years. Society was full of bigger scandals. Perhaps it is Eliza's subsequent behavior that creates the scandal; certainly her being compromised by Marcus does.

I had real problems with the plot, with character development, and with the ahistorical elements. The plot elements I had some problems with I have mentioned earlier. The characters I found most compelling and realistic were oddly Julian (the heroine's first love and her cousin) and Lady Lavinia (her aunt). The two girls were pretty but extraneous, and they took too much attention away from the hero and heroine. Through the first half, I was not sure what kind of book I was reading - a romance between Marcus and Eliza, a romance between Julian and Eliza, a study of the relationship between Marcus and the rest of his family, or something else. Uncertainty is good, but too much of it is not so great in a romance where certain elements are expected.

What I liked - the relationship developing between Marcus and Eliza, the realization that Julian and Eliza are wrong for each other (without Julian being a nasty person) and Eliza's own recognition of this only too late. I also like the way Eliza struggles to bring Marcus back to his family, although I found both her behavior and that of Marcus rather off-putting at one point.

Some historical problems - firstly, the grandfather of the heroine is firstly called Earl of Sheringham and then called Earl of Ravenswood (or some such thing). The author needs to be consistent here. I assume it is the latter title. There are other problems, which show the author's complete unfamiliarity with Regency England. A peer cannot disinherit his heir; Eliza's father would have been earl and she would have been Lady Elizabeth Sheringham if her father had outlived his father. [I assume this to be the case]. If a peer disappears and no body is located (or even an ordinary man disappears), some years' wait is required before the man is declared dead. Marcus could not have become Duke, succeeding his brother immediately. Did anyone else find the two ducal titles to be similar?

BTW Julian, the heroine's first love and her cousin never actually marries her but dies at Waterloo. Eliza is therefore ruined, having been caught in a compromising position with Marcus, and not being married. [See review dated April 27, 2000].


<< 1 2 >>

© 2004, ReviewFocus or its affiliates