<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: an excellent and riveting read
Review: Because his good friend and fellow journeyman, John Partridge, is indisposed, cabinet maker Thomas Chippendale asks Nathaniel Hopson, to go to Cambridgeshire in order to install the new library that Lord Montfort had commissioned. And even though Nathaniel would much rather stay in London and pursue an acquaintance with the charming Miss Alice Goodchild (who is currently running her father's wood business), duty dictates that he obey Chippendale's orders. At Montfort's estate however, he finds himself at the beck and call of a petty tyrant, much given to violent displays of temper, and who's disposition has made life rather unpleasant for both his much younger second wife, as well as for his unmarried sister. Nathaniel is looking forward most heartily to finishing the job and leaving Cambridgeshire, when disaster strikes: on the very night that Lord Montfort had invited his neighbours to dinner and in order to show off his new library, he's found dead in the library. Everyone at first believes that he has killed himself, especially when it comes to light that Montfort had lost a great deal of money to his neighbour, Lord Foley. But Nathaniel observes certain things that leads him to the conclusion that Lord Montfort may have been murdered instead. Everything becomes even more complicated when the mutilated body of Nathaniel's friend, John Partridge, is found frozen in a lake on the estate. Are the two deaths connected? And if so how? Did the two men know each other? Did Montfort kill Partridge or vice versa? These are the questions that plague Nathaniel. And when Lord Foley, who for reasons of his own, decides to make use of Nathaniel in order to discover what really happened that fateful night, Nathaniel reluctantly agrees to play investigator. Because for Nathaniel, discovering who killed Partridge and why is far more important than discovering what the rich and the titled are up to. And he will use whatever pretext comes his way in order to bring Partridge's murderer to justice..."The Grenadillo Box" made for some truly riveting reading. The authour is a rather well known art and antique expert, and her grasp for the history and social mores of the time (mid 18th century England) was fairly evident and added to the richness and texture of the novel. Also nicely one was the brilliant manner in which she captured the voice of her protagonist, Nathaniel Hopson. Nathaniel's awkwardness at mixing with those of a much higher social strata, the anger and loss he feels about Partridge's death, and the confusion he feels about his feelings for Alice is all very precisely and vividly portrayed. Indeed, it was this engaging and taking portrayal of Nathaniel that compelled me to read on. And while the plot did seem to be a little complicated (mainly because of the manner in which the story is allowed to unfold) the pacing was swift and taut, so that the book truly does make for an engrossing and suspenseful read. So that all in all, I'd vote "The Grenadillo Box" as a truly worthwhile and excellent read.
Rating: 
Summary: Solidly Good, though not Spectacular
Review: Nathaniel Hopkins is a journeyman to Thomas Chippendale, and in that role is sent to the home of Lord Monfort to oversee the installation of some bookshelves. While he is there, Lord Monfort is found dead, though by his own hand or that of a murderer is unclear. Monfort's close associate, Lord Foley is given the task of sorting it all out and, having noticed Nate's exceptional observational skills, requests his help. Nate slowly unravels the mystery, often missing the truth all together. Eventually he is successful in unraveling both the mystery of Monfort and of Nate's friend John Partridge. Gleeson's first novel has a real feel for London (and the surrounding countryside) in 1755 and it's apparent that she has done her research. Her writing is good and the mystery itself is compelling and interesting. I found flaw with a few important details, though--the leeches for example, and Madame Trenti for another. I won't be more specific, as I don't want to spoil the novel, so suffice it to say that there were several bits where the "answer" just was not answer enough for me. Stylistically, too, the book is a bit flawed. According to the letter preface, the entire book is written from Nate to Alice, to tell her all that happened. However, Nate gives details that, given his character, he would not have told Alice. Nearly to the end of the book, he gives the manuscript to Alice, and yet continues to write it afterwards, which felt messy and unbelievable and simply did not flow well. Furthermore, in his preface, Nate mentions a desk that neither he nor Alice had seen at the time he wrote the letter--if we are to take in account the point where he stops writing, gives Alice the manuscript and then continues writing later. It was after this second bout of writing that the desk is seen. Don't let me put you off this book, though, with my criticisms. It's still a good read, highly enjoyable and just winding enough to satisfy most mystery lovers.
Rating:
Summary: Solidly Good, though not Spectacular
Review: Nathaniel Hopkins is a journeyman to Thomas Chippendale, and in that role is sent to the home of Lord Monfort to oversee the installation of some bookshelves. While he is there, Lord Monfort is found dead, though by his own hand or that of a murderer is unclear. Monfort's close associate, Lord Foley is given the task of sorting it all out and, having noticed Nate's exceptional observational skills, requests his help. Nate slowly unravels the mystery, often missing the truth all together. Eventually he is successful in unraveling both the mystery of Monfort and of Nate's friend John Partridge. Gleeson's first novel has a real feel for London (and the surrounding countryside) in 1755 and it's apparent that she has done her research. Her writing is good and the mystery itself is compelling and interesting. I found flaw with a few important details, though--the leeches for example, and Madame Trenti for another. I won't be more specific, as I don't want to spoil the novel, so suffice it to say that there were several bits where the "answer" just was not answer enough for me. Stylistically, too, the book is a bit flawed. According to the letter preface, the entire book is written from Nate to Alice, to tell her all that happened. However, Nate gives details that, given his character, he would not have told Alice. Nearly to the end of the book, he gives the manuscript to Alice, and yet continues to write it afterwards, which felt messy and unbelievable and simply did not flow well. Furthermore, in his preface, Nate mentions a desk that neither he nor Alice had seen at the time he wrote the letter--if we are to take in account the point where he stops writing, gives Alice the manuscript and then continues writing later. It was after this second bout of writing that the desk is seen. Don't let me put you off this book, though, with my criticisms. It's still a good read, highly enjoyable and just winding enough to satisfy most mystery lovers.
Rating:
Summary: Murders and mores of the past
Review: Nathaniel Hopson is a journeyman cabinet maker who was apprenticed to the famous 18th century London cabinet maker, Thomas Chippendale. While installing a new library in the country home of Lord Montford, Nathaniel is present when the body of his patron is found shot dead. As Lord Montford was heavily in debt after gambling away a large part of his estate, everyone present at the dinner party which was taking place at the time, is convinced that he has committed suicide..all except Nathaniel! Taking into account bloody footprints in the room and more footprints in the snow outside the window, Nathaniel teams up with one of the dinner guests, neighbour, Lord Foley, to whom Lord Montford was indebted, to do some detective work. The next day, the mutilated body of Nathaniels' friend and workmate is found, frozen in a pond near the house. The box referred to in the books' title, is found near the hand of Lord Montford and proves to be a puzzle box made of many exotic woods..a diversion much sought after by the gentry of that time. It's a deliciously descriptive account of life among the merchant and upper classes of the 18th century, rathy wordy in the style of writers of that period, but a joy to readers of historical fiction.
Rating:
Summary: A highly atmospheric and exquisitely detailed debut
Review: On New Year's Day, 1755, Nathaniel Hopson, an apprentice or journeyman to the cabinet maker, Thomas Chippendale, has just completed the finishing touches on the library of Lord Montfort at his country estate. He soon finds himself embroiled in a conflict as Lord Montfort is discovered dead in that same library. It is initially thought to be a suicide due to despondency as a direct result of excessive gambling debts. However, blood on a windowpane and the discovery of a body in a nearby pond tends to indicate a strong possibility of murder. One of the dead men is an old friend of Nathaniel and draws him into the investigation of the deaths. He travels, not only in this country village, but, throughout London to get at the truth.
A great deal of research went into this highly atmospheric and exquisitely detailed debut novel. A complaint might be that the author went into a bit too much detail thereby slowing the pacing, at times, to a standstill. However, characters were, overall, very realistically sketched and fit in quite well to the historical setting. It is this innate ability that Ms. Gleeson had to draw the reader into another world that makes this first novel so sterling. The highly compelling plot and clever solution only confirm this as one of the year's best.
<< 1 >>
|
