Rating: ![4 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-4-0.gif) Summary: A-Plus Review: Linda Howard gives us one of the better reading experiences. Romance lovers will find her a delight. Also highly recommend No Illusions by Cassandra Ormand
Rating: ![1 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-1-0.gif) Summary: A Rare Talent/ low, common book Review: Linda Howard has a rare talent. She can write with sensitivity and humor, and her character and plot development are often great. I have read all her books once, and many of the older ones, many times. In writing this book Ms. Howard has betrayed her talent. This book is basically...- no character development, and no plot. All that happens in these stories is that two people meet, have [fun] , and "fall in love" in a 24 hour period. This from a woman who wrote" Duncan's Bride", "White Lies", and" Sarah's Child". Since I have followed Ms. Howard's writing career from the beginning, it seems to me as if she has really lost something since she has moved to the NEW YORK TIMES bestseller list. She has become just one more commercial, trashy writer. I sincerely wish she would return to her old, memorable writing style. It is painful to watch someone who can move me to tears,laughter, and caring waste her talent this way.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: STRANGERS IN THE NIGHT Review: LINDA IS A GREAT AUTHOR! BUT I AM VERY UNHAPPY ABOUT BUYING REPRINTS OF STORIES I HAVE ALREADY READ. YOU COULD HAVE WARNED US. I WILL BE VERY CAREFUL NEXT TIME I PRE ORDER. A DEVOTED CALIFORNIA FAN!
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: STRANGERS IN THE NIGHT Review: LINDA IS A GREAT AUTHOR! BUT!!!!! I AM VERY UNHAPPY ABOUT BUYING REPRINTS OF STORIES I HAVE ALREADY READ. YOU COULD HAVE WARNED US. I WILL BE VERY CAREFUL NEXT TIME I PRE ORDER. A DEVOTED CALIFORNIA FAN!!!
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: For those that like to be manhandled on occasion: Review: More than a few people where offended by the third story. However, I am not one of those people... I thought the stories where very entertaining and I tell you once I picked the book up I didn't put it down until I was finished. Which was about 3 hours later. The first and third stories were very good the second was just ok. Keep them coming Linda...
Rating: ![3 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-3-0.gif) Summary: Just another reprint Review: Nothing to get excited about.... It is just another reprint..."Strangers In The Night" includes "Lake of Dreams," "Blue Moon" and "White Out."
Rating: ![4 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-4-0.gif) Summary: Enjoy a little fantasy in these 3 stories Review: Reprints or not...these are fictional accounts of LOVE AT FIRST SIGHT with strangers. And they are wonderful...strange for the real world. But great stories.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: A Steamy Collection Of Romance At Its Finest! Review: Strangers in The Night by 'steamy romance specialist' Linda Howard is a super mix of steamy romance, gripping tension, and emotional impact. A contemporary fiction featuring (3) seductive novella's, Lake Of Dreams, Blue Moon, and White Out. Come aboard and experience the unexpected passion of these strangers in the night!
Rating: ![4 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-4-0.gif) Summary: melder Review: These are a reprint of three short stories that have previously appeared in other anthologies. They are very good stories as ususal for this author. However, publishers and book sellers need to warn their buyers that these are tired old reprints!!
Rating: ![2 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-2-0.gif) Summary: Mushy but no substance Review: These stories had no substance. These couples got together very quickly and there wasn't any thrill of the chase. I am a huge fan of Linda Howard, have loved all of her books (well... except Sarah's Child because she was such a pushover) but now Strangers is on that no good list. I read the book because of the great reviews but I should have believed the reader from California, written 11/22/02.
|