<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: A thoughtful discussion of how to interpret the Confessions
Review: After being active in the Presbyterian church for over 25 years, I finally have some understanding of what the Confessions are all about. This book gives real insight into how Presbyterians interpret the Bible. It also explains the theological process whereby they changed their thinking over time on issues such as slavery, women in the church, and the distinction between essential and non-essential issues. To outside observers, these shifts may appear to be "political" more than theological, but Rogers shows that the changes are firmly grounded in core theology. Given that the Presbyterians-- torn in a dispute over the role of homosexuals in the church--recently wrote into their Book of Order (constitution) a provision elevating the Confessions to an exceptionally high level, this book becomes nearly invaluable if one is to see these developments in historical and theological context. I recommend this book very highly.
Rating: 
Summary: Very disappointing
Review: Dr. Rogers is one of the elder statesman of the PCUSA. He has long been a leader among one variety of churchmen in that group -- folks who are theological middle of the road but fear the theologically conservative wing of the small evangelical contingent above all else. He has expended alot of energy over the years trying to make the orthodox look less orthodox ("Calvin did not believe in Biblical inspiration", etc.) He has gradually embraced more radical church policies as his denomination has moved ot the left, while continuing to call himself a liberal "evangelical." He knows the confessional heritage of the Reformed tradition quite well, but his bias and denominational politics seem to have clouded his judgment in this book. Really this is largely a waste.
Rating: 
Summary: Heretical
Review: Yes, Rogers is a heretic. The church ought to have excommunicated him long ago.
<< 1 >>
| 
