<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: mana in the wilderness
Review: A lot of people have attacked the Jesus Seminar and its credibility. For those who have doubts read "The Jesus Seminar and its Critics." Though I don't agree with everything they believe (i.e. their view on miracles) they have done some respectable things that can only help in our search for the truth, such as this book. This book should not replace the canonized gospels but shouldn't be discarded either.
Rating:
Summary: mana in the wilderness
Review: A lot of people have attacked the Jesus Seminar and its credibility. For those who have doubts read "The Jesus Seminar and its Critics." Though I don't agree with everything they believe (i.e. their view on miracles) they have done some respectable things that can only help in our search for the truth, such as this book. This book should not replace the canonized gospels but shouldn't be discarded either.
Rating:
Summary: a short but useful synopsis of the work of the Jesus Seminar
Review: If you have time for only one book by the Jesus Seminar, this is the book you should consider as it contains a short but useful synopsis of much of their work.
Features:
1- The book reads like a New Testament gospel, so you can read it straight through if you just want the straight scoop. But if/when you want additional information, there are notes on the left side of each page showing the source(s) of each grouping of verses, including chapter and verse, to enable comparisons. There are also more extensive notes on each chapter at the end of the book, including comments about why such and such an event or parable was included and what the consensus of the JS was on the various events.
2- An index in the back of the book gives a short description of each of the ancient gospels from which Funk and his colleagues drew the facts and inspiration for their own gospel. Unfortunately, they have neglected a couple of the gospels mentioned in the book, among them Pseudo Mark which, as far as I can tell, refers to a short section of Mark Chapter 16. (see the notes for the Epilogue on page 105)
3- Another short appendix gives a description of the Jesus Seminar: who they are and some details about their Biblical research. This section is very informative and would be useful to those who know little or nothing about the group. I want to give the book to my father as a gift as I think the contains a wealth of information about both the Jesus Seminar and their scholarship in suitable form for those who know little or nothing about them.
4- Yet another appendix gives detailed notes for each chapter of the gospel. These sometimes include quotes from sources like The Gospel of Thomas which can't readily be located by someone who only has a conventional New Testament.
Suggestions:
1- I hope a future edition will contain a small glossary to explain terms like Purity Party which are unfamiliar to folks like me who are not formally educated in Biblical studies. (I'm guessing this might refer to the Pharisees in the way that the Saducees are often referred to as scribes.) Perhaps such a glossary could cover minor gospels like Pseudo Mark (see above) that aren't deemed comprehensive enough to be discussed in the Ancient Gospels appendix.
2- I would like a better explanation of how the color-based voting works. They describe it as a weighted system, but I would be interested in knowing exactly what this means. If I were doing it, I might assign red beads two points, pink one, grey negative one and black negative two. But I don't know if this would be the best way or, more importantly, how it is, in fact, being done by the JS.
Some comments about specific parts of the text appear below:
The book contains a prologue, twenty-one chapters and an epilogue. The prologue discusses the circumstances surrounding Jesus's birth and childhood. Oddly, the narration here jumps from his birth to various people's comments and opinions about him as a prophet with no warning, and the bulk of the chapter is taken up by these statements.
Even strangeer is the quote from Paul which appears in verse 13 discussing a visit he made to Jerusalem after Jesus's death. I puzzled over this for some time and finally came to the conclusion that Funk and the Jesus Seminar want to remind us that the first writings about Jesus appeared long after his death, and that some were written by people who never even met Jesus.
Another minor criticism I have is that the authors can't seem to decide if they want a modern-day translation or something closer to King James English. In several chapters, they mix tenses in that annoying way that many New Testament passages do. Yet in others, they use very modern colloquial expressions. (It would be interesting to see a foreign-language translation of this book to see how some of these expressions have been handled in other languages.)
It was interesting to see which parables the Jesus Seminar saw fit to include in their gospel. I wish they would have provided more information in their notes as to why they chose the ones they did and not others. They do provide good information about the miracles and their ideas about the circumstances surrounding each. A similar discussion of the parables would be useful, too.
One reason I love this book is that it presents Jesus' parables in a new context which makes them fresh to my ears. As a result, I'm able to think about them in new ways, freed from the baggage of so many years of Sunday School explanations. I'm willing to disagree and formulate arguments against the points the parables make yet, in the end, I always have to admit that there are just as many arguments in favor of them. This is a testament to the fact that Jesus' parables have just as much value as teaching devices today as they did 2,000 years ago.
Rating: 
Summary: Realize what this is.
Review: The Jesus Seminar is a group of scholars who have attempted to reduce the traditional gospels to those words that, in their opinion, Jesus actually said. The start out with a number of assumptions, the biggest one being that miracles are impossible, therefore the resurrection has to be fictional.Furthermore, realize that the Jesus Seminar does not constitute the mainstream of Biblical studies: they are quite radical in their interpretations. Frankly, a lot of this book is based on works (such as the Gospel of Thomas) which are much later in origin than the original four gospels (even according to the most liberal theologians). The book, as a whole, is a wonderful example of using one's conclusions to prove themselves. I read this book to see what the Jesus Seminar was saying. Frankly, I was expecting that the Jesus Seminar would not be nearly so bad as evangelical scholars have painted it. Unfortunately, I was wrong. This, and their other works, strike me as some of the worst historical scholarship I've seen.
Rating:
Summary: flawed scholarship
Review: This book, like all of the books by those involved with the Westar Institute, gives the reader a chance to make intelligent decisions about one's faith on one's own. Unlike many so-called theological books on the market, this book does not attempt to proselytize and force a particular viewpoint onto the reader. Read, enjoy, and expand your theological and faith horizons.
Rating: 
Summary: Faith and Thinking
Review: This book, like all of the books by those involved with the Westar Institute, gives the reader a chance to make intelligent decisions about one's faith on one's own. Unlike many so-called theological books on the market, this book does not attempt to proselytize and force a particular viewpoint onto the reader. Read, enjoy, and expand your theological and faith horizons.
Rating:
Summary: flawed scholarship
Review: [...] Funk indeed attempts to force a particular viewpoint: the Christ of faith is a fiction. Whether you believe that or not, the problem with the Jesus Seminar is that their scholarship is flawed. They apply certain criteria to "determine" what Jesus "historically" said, yet they ignore their own criteria when it comes to miracles. For more details regarding the problems with the Jesus Seminar, read Jesus Under Fire.
<< 1 >>
|
