Home :: Books :: Religion & Spirituality  

Arts & Photography
Audio CDs
Audiocassettes
Biographies & Memoirs
Business & Investing
Children's Books
Christianity
Comics & Graphic Novels
Computers & Internet
Cooking, Food & Wine
Entertainment
Gay & Lesbian
Health, Mind & Body
History
Home & Garden
Horror
Literature & Fiction
Mystery & Thrillers
Nonfiction
Outdoors & Nature
Parenting & Families
Professional & Technical
Reference
Religion & Spirituality

Romance
Science
Science Fiction & Fantasy
Sports
Teens
Travel
Women's Fiction
Ancient-Future Faith: Rethinking Evangelicalism for a Postmodern World

Ancient-Future Faith: Rethinking Evangelicalism for a Postmodern World

List Price: $19.99
Your Price: $13.59
Product Info Reviews

<< 1 >>

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: Highly relevant and insightful
Review: I found this book exciting and easy to read. The reason is that Webber connects the ethic and doctrine of the ancient Church to the postmodern world. The situations are quite similar. Webber, a conservative Baptist turned evangelical Episcopalian, argues that the history of the Church consists of different paradigms. Each paradigm is a different expression of the faith, relevant for the time, but inadequate for later generations. Thus, while reformation theology of Sola Scriptura was necessary to counteract the excesses of the later Middle Ages, for the postmodern (and for the early) Church it doesn't work very well (it has led to 1000s of denominations). Webber has some very helpful tables comparing beliefs of different paradigms.

Webber correctly observes that postmodern people are more diverse, less concerned about minor doctrinal differences, and more symbolic. This coincides with new scientific theories that posit a dynamic, non-Newtonian universe. So how can we find authority and meaning? The answer is classical Christianity. Enlightenment rationalism doesn't work anymore, as relativity destroys any idea of objectivity, so theology must be done in the context of the Christian community, the Church, as it was in early Christianity. The Church provides the interpretive authority of the Bible through the creeds. However, this authority is broad, and is something that Catholics, Orthodox, and (most) Protestants share in common (see Vincent of Lerins' canon). As in the early Church, Jesus is the ultimate focal point of the Church, and apostolic tradition and the Bible point to him.

Webber makes use of the "Christus Victor" model of the Atonement. This is the predominant theory of the Atonement expounded by the early Church. This theory says that Jesus, in his Incarnation, death, resurrection, and teachings, conquered evil. It is holistic, rather than narrowing down "when" Christ saved us, such as at the Crucifixion. Thus there is room for unity and mystery in the doctrine, just as in the early Church.

Ultimately, as Modernity dies, Webber advocates a return to the early church of the Fathers. Thus the Church needs to be less individualistic, unified by the creeds, symbolic, sacramental, and arts oriented. However, Webber doesn't want postmodern values to *shape* the Church (e.g. when the Church is a business or side-show), but rather that the Church must be able to convey its basic truth in the postmodern world. Webber is simply advocating what many are already doing: rediscovering the riches of ancient Christianity, dismissed by many enlightenment-era Christians as "outdated" (liberals), or "irrelevant to faith" (fundamentalists). The era of Classical Christianity, when major doctrines were shaped, ethics were worked out, and the canon closed, is neither outdated nor irrelevant.

Rating: 1 stars
Summary: Becoming irrelevant
Review: Robert E. Webber surprised me with a well articulated but poorly concieved premise: To be relevant to a post-modern culture we must replace "sola-scriptura" and a sin-atonement gospel with a generalized "Christus Victor" (Christ conquering evil). This, Weber claims, is what the first church adhered to. As such, it must be the only correct and more importantly, unifying premise that can rejoin our fractured Christian communities throughout the world. I suppose a serious claim to defining the unifying theory for the 21st century church deserves a read. After reading this book, I can see why the writings of the reformation have been so enduring...

1) How chauvinistic can we be to think that we post-moderns have eyes to see into the first century Christian paradyme while at the same time declaring those of the middle-ages, reformation, and modern age were blind? Do we really believe that Augustine, Luther, and Calvin were only reacting to contemporary circumstances without trying to hold on to the ancient faith of the first century Church? Do we really believe we can think outside of our own world anymore then they could beyond thier times? Face it--- the first century world is gone forever, and our minds can never understand it---let alone restore it.

2) How can a post-modern world, with unprecedented globalism, and the ancient world, ever produce the same type of church? Why even discuss such impossibilities? Christ's Church was His in the first century, and was His in the 16th century, and is His today. Or are we to now accept, along with NT Wright, that we took a wrong turn with Augustine and Christ is still back there waiting for us to turn this thing around?

3) Sola Scriptora is merely propositionalism and insufficient for guiding our Churches? When an evangelical declares this, then he is no longer an evangelical. I see similiar dynamics unleased in C. Peter Wagners "Churchquake" which asserts that God is restoring true biblical Apostolic government ala the first century church, or Tommy Tenney who says we "need to stop worshipping the Word of God and instead worship the God of the Word." Would Webber identify himself with these charismatic "theologians" and their post-modern restoration of the first century Church? Afterall, these men also believe that the Church, and not scripture, has the final authority to establish truth.

At times Webber seemed to be forecasting as much as selling this "change". In the end, we might construct a post-modern version of the Gospel, complete with culturally relevant symbols for our time. Ironically, this is just what will make us irrelevant to this age.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: In simple words...
Review: This book has all ready been splendidly reviewed, but I felt I may have a few things to note. The author is a professor, and the book is written as such. People seeking "warm fuzzies" from reading a book about rediscovering classical Christianity are not going to find it here. They will instead find a powerful look at the way that classical Christianity can be drawn upon to reenergize the church, specifically the evangelical church, and make it a more dynamic force in the world as the body of Christ. Very highly recommended.


<< 1 >>

© 2004, ReviewFocus or its affiliates